similar to: randomizing within factors and combining unequal-sized arrays

Dear all: I want to divide the graphing window in to three plots such that two plots are on the top and one at the bottom. The upper two plots are of equal sizes that cover 50% of the Window, third plot spans the lower half portion of the Window completely. How do I do that, I tried layout and other options but they seem to have the matrix options which does not solve my problem. Any help or

Dear R experts, I'm beginner. My question about ANOVA for unequal sample sized data should be obsolete but I can not clarify it. I have a dataset from 23 males and 18 females. I measured one condition('cond') with 4 levels. So I'd like to see main effect of gender, cond and gender by cond interaction and also postHoc test. (In fact, I have to do anova 90 times) * 1. Question

Has anyone created or rebuilt a Linux Software RAID having mirrored partitions on unequal sized hard disks ? There is a CentOS 5 server having two 400 GB hard disks with five mirrored partitions (software RAID 1) and one of the hard disks is dying. Since new 400 GB HDDs are not available here, we are exploring the possibility of replacing the faulty hard disk with one of a higher capacity (500 GB

Dear List, I need to print out each of 'k' levels of a factor 'n' times each, where 'n' is the number of elements belonging to each factor. I know that this can normally be done using the gl() command, but in my case, each level 'k' has an unequal number of elements. Example with code is as below: vc<-read.table("P:\\Transit\\CORRECT

If I have two vectors X<-1:10 Y<-1:5 When I combine them using cbind, the shorter one is repeated and both are made of the same length. Is there a methods that does this without duplicating the shorter one. I want to use this to store the data back to a file. Thanks ../Murli [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

dear R experts--- I am experimenting with multicore processing, so far with pretty disappointing results. Here is my simple example: A <- 100000 randvalues <- abs(rnorm(A)) minfn <- function( x, i ) { log(abs(x))+x^3+i/A+randvalues[i] } ?## an arbitrary function ARGV <- commandArgs(trailingOnly=TRUE) if (ARGV[1] == "do-onecore") { ?library(foreach) ?discard <-

Hi everybody, let us assume i have the following matrixX and vectorY matrixX <- runif(100) dim(matrixX) <- c(10,10) vectorY <- as.matrix(as.character(seq(1,10))) if I define: subsample<-c("2") i can extract the rows from matriX based on the elements in vectorY which are listed in subsample matrixX[vectorY==subsample] if I define subsample with more than 1 element, such

Hi, I'm trying to write a code (see below) to randomly resample measurements of one variable (say here the variable "counts" in the data frame "dat") with different resampled subsample sizes. The code works fine for a single resampled subsample size (in the code below = 10). I then tried to generalize this by writing a function with a loop, where in each loop the function

R-help readers, I''m having a problem with an R script (see below), which regularly generates the error message, Error in start:(start + (sample.length - 1)) : NA/NaN argument , for which I am unsure of the cause. In essence, the script (below) generates the start and end points for random subsamples from along a vector (in reality a transect (of a given length,

Hello- I have run an ANOVA on 4 treatments with unequal sample sizes (n=9,7,10 and 10). I want to determine where my sig. differences are between treatments using a Bonferroni test, and have run the code: pairwise.t.test(Wk16, Treatment, p.adf="bonf") I receive an error message stating that my arguments are of unequal length: Error in tapply(x, g, mean, na.rm = TRUE) :

Dear Douglas and R-help, Does lme assume normal distribution AND equal variance among groups like anova() does? If it does, is there any method like unequal variance T-test (Welch T) in lme when each group has unequal variance in my data? Thanks, Shirley

Hi, I am doing multiple regression, and have several X variables that are categorical. I read that I can use dummy or contrast codes for that, but are there any special rules when there're unequal #observations in each groups (4 females vs 7 males in a "gender" variable)? Also, can R generate these codes for me? THanks.

Hello, I have some patient data for my masters thesis with three groups (n=16, 19 & 20) I have completed compiling the results of 7 tests, for which one of these tests the variances are unequal. I wish to perform an ANOVA between the three groups but for the one test with unequal variance (<0.001 by both bartlett and levene's test) I am not sure what to do. I thought i would run

I am using levelplot() from lattice with grids that have unequal cell sizes. This means that the boundary between two cells is not always half-way between nodes, as levelplot() assumes. The result is that some cell sizes are rendered incorrectly, which can be painfully obvious if using relatively large cells. Is there any work-around? I am using the conditioning capability of lattice and

Dear R users, I need to merge two data frames based on both equal and unequal comparisons. The "sqldf" package used to work well , but today, I cannot resolve the following error by reinstallation of the sqldf package. Can anyone suggest a different way to perform this kind of merge function? Thank you, Ding > DMRlog2pbde47DMS <- sqldf("select * from DMR_log2pbde47 as a

Hi, i'm looking for an R function to fit a one-way ANOVA with one factor containing 10 levels. The factor levels have different numbers of observations (varying between 20 to 40). For most of the dependent variables i'm testing there are unequal variances among the factor levels. I see the function oneway.test: oneway.test(variable ~ factor, data=dataset) which by default does not

Ein eingebundener Text mit undefiniertem Zeichensatz wurde abgetrennt. Name: nicht verf?gbar URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20110828/ac62948a/attachment.pl>

Hello All, Would anyone be able to help me understand how R computes a quantile-quantile plot for comparing two data samples with unequal sample sizes? Normally, the procedure should be to rearrange the larger data sample into n equally-spaced parts using interpolation, where n is the sample size of the smaller sample, and then plot the matching data pairs. I tried using different plotting

This is in followup to a thread on R-help with subject "Sampling". I claim that R does the wrong thing by default when sampling with unequal probabilities without replacement - the selection probabilities are not proportional to 'prob', for any draw after the first: I suggest that R do what S-PLUS now does (though you're free to choose a better implementation). What S-PLUS

Hi, I am having problems getting cohen's kappa to work. I have been using the function: ><-ckappa(x,y) from the psy package. I am trying to test for inter-observer reliability, I have 2 observers and 26 categories, however, the two observers might not necessarily have the same range of categories (I have unequal score ranges). However, I thought R could cope with this. Each time I