similar to: R-1.7.1 for Redhat 9

Dear, I tried to install the DBI package in R-1.7.1, but this gave the following error: /volume1/scratch/jallemee/R/lib/R/bin/INSTALL: line 1: 1856 Done ( echo "options(save.image.defaults=${save_image_defaults})"; if test -s R_PROFILE.R; then cat R_PROFILE.R; fi; echo

Hello, I just managed to compile openssh-3.6.1p1 on Ultrix/MIPS. One of the fixes needed for this is the following. It's because of: --- According to the Changelog - markus at cvs.openbsd.org 2002/12/10 19:26:50 [packet.c] move tos handling to packet_set_tos; ok provos/henning/deraadt --- This IP_TOS is now nicely stuffed in a function, but that function should be #defined

Hi, On 2018-03-07 16:35, Ondrej Valousek wrote: > Why do you need to replace your existing solution? > If you don't need to scale out due to the capacity reasons, the async > NFS server will always outperform GlusterFS The current solution is 8 years old and is reaching its end of life. The reason we are also looking into gluster is that we like that it uses standard components

Hello, I have a concrete statistical question: I have a sample of an univariate mixture of an unknown number (k) of normal distributions, each time with an unknown mean `m_i' and a standard deviation `k * m_i', where k is known factor constant for all the normal distributions. (The `i' is a subscript.) Is there a function in R that can estimate the number of normal distributions k

Hi, We are looking into replacing our current storage solution and are evaluating gluster for this purpose. Our current solution uses a SAN with two servers attached that serve samba and NFS 4. Clients connect to those servers using NFS or SMB. All users' home directories live on this server. I would like to have some insight in who else is using gluster for home directories for about 500

Hi, Why do you need to replace your existing solution? If you don't need to scale out due to the capacity reasons, the async NFS server will always outperform GlusterFS Ondrej ----- The information contained in this e-mail and in any attachments is confidential and is designated solely for the attention of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, you must not use,

Hi, As I posted in my previous emails - glusterfs can never match NFS (especially async one) performance of small files/latency. That's given by the design. Nothing you can do about it. Ondrej -----Original Message----- From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of Rik Theys Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 10:38 AM To: gluster-users at

Hi, I've done some similar tests and experience similar performance issues (see my 'gluster for home directories?' thread on the list). If I read your mail correctly, you are comparing an NFS mount of the brick disk against a gluster mount (using the fuse client)? Which options do you have set on the NFS export (sync or async)? >From my tests, I concluded that the issue was not

On 3/19/2018 5:42 AM, Ondrej Valousek wrote: Removing NFS or NFS Ganesha from the equation, not very impressed on my own setup either. For the writes it's doing, that's alot of CPU usage in top. Seems bottle-necked via a single execution core somewhere trying to facilitate read / writes to the other bricks. Writes to the gluster FS from within one of the gluster participating bricks:

Hi Rik, Nice clarity and detail in the description. Thanks! inline... On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:29 PM, Rik Theys <Rik.Theys at esat.kuleuven.be> wrote: > Hi, > > We are looking into replacing our current storage solution and are > evaluating gluster for this purpose. Our current solution uses a SAN > with two servers attached that serve samba and NFS 4. Clients connect to

Hello everyone! I have to implement the functionality of mounting all VM disks/partitions. E.g. if a VM has 2 disks of 2 partitions each (I get it from virt-filesystems), I want to get the following structure on host node after mount: mnt/ ------hdd0/ -------------volume1/ -------------volume2/ ------hdd1/ -------------volume1/ -------------volume2/ I'd like to use guestmount due to

Hey guys, i tried to create a simple rsync script that should create daily backups from a ZFS storage and put them into a timestamp folder. After creating the initial full backup, the following backups should only contain "new data" and the rest will be referenced via hardlinks (-link-dest) This was at least a simple enough scenario to achieve it with my pathetic scripting skills.

I have a server and just finished building my raids. One of the partitions is supposed to house my home folders which I then want to share with my windows computers. Before I begin migration of all my data I created a user to test if I can move my home folders from /home/<user>over to the path /mnt/volume1/homes/<user>. The move worked without problems through usermod -m -d

Fellow gluster users, trying to extend a 3 node cluster that is serving me very reliably for a long time now. Cluster is serving two volumes: Volume Name: gv0 Type: Distributed-Replicate Volume ID: 9bafc4d2-d9b6-4b6d-a631-1cf42d1d2559 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 6 x (2 + 1) = 18 Transport-type: tcp Volume Name: gv1 Type: Replicate Volume ID:

Hello all, We're having problems with files that suddenly stop being seen on the fuse clients. I couldn't yet find a way to reproduce this. It happens every once in a while. Sometimes you try to ls some file and it can't be found. When you run ls on the parent directory, it is shown on the output, and, after that, you can access it. I'm mentioning ls, but the problem also

Hello, context: Samba-3.0.2 on a i386 debian-sarge linux, 2.4 kernel. All the windows machine on our network switched today to NTLMv2, and mount.smbfs can't access anymore ressources which are available to smbclient. Exerpt from smb.conf: client NTLMv2 auth = Yes client lanman auth = No client plaintext auth = No The rest being default. Doing smbclient -L server

Hi I'm running into a rather strange and frustrating bug and wondering if anyone on the mailing list might have some insight about what might be causing it. I'm running a cluster of two dozen nodes, where the processing nodes are also the gluster bricks (using the SLURM resource manager). Each node has the glusters mounted natively (not NFS). All nodes are using v3.2.7. Each job in the

Dear all, I am the author of an open-source package for mathematical optimization and automatic differentiation called CasADi (www.casadi.org) and have recently started realize the potential of the LLVM project. At the core of CasADi are two fast interpretors for mathematical expressions and I'm now planning to complement these with JIT-compilation using LLVM. Does anyone know if there is

Hi, I have a problem that was already discused in the german archlinux forum and couldn't be solved. Because of this I was asked to use the rsync mailing list. So here I am ;b I'm using the following script to backup my data to a Network Attached Storage that has an ext3 formated hdd that is mounted via NFS script: http://pastebin.com/f6b7115c9 This script works fine for /home but

hi there, I'm following these documentations to add a file-based disk volume to a KVM guest under Centos 6.0 : http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Virtualization/chap-Virtualization-Storage_Volumes.html as instructed, I created a "pool" then a "volume", file-based, e.g : mkdir /mnt/raid/kvm_pool1 virsh # pool-define-as pool1 dir - - - -