similar to: recording and taking mean of a set of matrices

A general question that I have been pursuing for some time but have set aside. When finishing some analysis, I can have multiple matrices that have specific column names. Ideally, I would like to combine these separate matrices for a final output as a csv file. A generic example: Matrix 1 var1A var1B var1C x x x x x

Hi, May be this helps: m1<- as.matrix(read.table(text=" y1 g24 y1 0 1 g24 1 0 ",sep="",header=TRUE)) m2<-as.matrix(read.table(text="y1 c1 c2 l17 ?y1 0 1 1 1 ?c1 1 0 1 1 ?c2 1 1 0 1 ?l17 1 1 1 0",sep="",header=TRUE)) m3<- as.matrix(read.table(text="y1 h4??? s2???? s30 ?y1 0 1 1 1 ?h4 1 0 1 1 ?s2 1 1 0 1 ?s30 1 1 1

I would like to be able to randomise presence-absence (i.e. binary) matrices whilst keeping both the row and column totals constant. Is there a function in R that would allow me to do this? I'm working with vegetation presence-absence matrices based on field observations. The matrices are formatted to have sites as rows and species as columns. The presence of a species on a site is

Dear all: I'm trying to fit the optimal Box-Cox transformation related to nls (see the code below) for the demand of money data in Green (3th Edition) but in the last step R gives the next error message. Error en `[.data.frame`(eval(object$data), , as.character(formula(object)[[2]])[2]) : undefined columns selected. ?Any idea to solve the problem? Thanks in advance,

I've been scratching my head over this one for too long. I'm hoping someone out there can solve this riddle. I have two vectors of characters, v1 and v2, both of length L, and two matrices of logicals, m1 and m2, both of dimension N*L. The first matrix of logicals corresponds to the first vector of characters, and the second to the second. The matrices are telling me which of the

Hi, For example, given two 2x2 matrices m1 and m2. I would like to add/subtract element by element > m1 [,1] [,2] [1,] NA NA [2,] 1 2 > m2 [,1] [,2] [1,] 1 NA [2,] NA 2 > m1 + m2 [,1] [,2] [1,] NA NA [2,] NA 4 How can I ignore the NA, and get this ? Hope the solution can be extended to subtract and modulo also. [,1] [,2]

Dear Members, I have two estimated transition matrices and I want to compare them. In fact I want to check the hypothesis if they come from the same process. I tried to look for some test but all I found was independence test of contingency tables. The following code shows that the usual chi-squared test statistic does not follow chisq distribution. MCRepl <- 5000 khi12 <- rep(0,MCRepl)

My two matrices are roughly the sizes of m1 and m2. I tried using two apply and cor.test to compute the correlation p.values. More than an hour, and the codes are still running. Please help to make it more efficient. m1 <- matrix(rnorm(100000), ncol=100) m2 <- matrix(rnorm(10000000), ncol=100) cor.pvalues <- apply(m1, 1, function(x) { apply(m2, 1, function(y) { cor.test(x,y)$p.value

Dear All, I have two matrices A (40 x 732) and B (40 x 1230) and would like to calculate correlation between them.  I can use: cor(A,B, method="pearson") to calculate correlation between all possible pairs. But the issue is that there is one-many specific mappings between A and B and I just need to calculate correlations for those pairs (not all). Some variables in A (proteins, say p1)

Dear R-helpers, I have a huge data-set so need to avoid for loops as much as possible. Can someone think how I can compute the result in the following example (that uses a for-loop) using some version of apply instead (or any other similarly super-efficient function)? example: #Suppose a matrix: m1=cbind(1:5,1:5,1:5) #The aim is to create a new matrix with every column containing the

m1 <- matrix(rnorm(40), ncol=4) m2 <- matrix(rnorm(40), ncol=4) I would like to subtract first column of m1 from all columns of m2, subtract 2nd of m1 from all columns of m2, and so on. Obviously, I am not using the appropriate function outer(m1, m1, "-"), since the first column isn't all 0s. _________________________________________________________________

Hello I have 4 1000*1000 matrix A,B,C,D. I want to use the corresponding element of the 4 matrices. Using the "for loop" as follow: E<-o for (i in 1:1000) {for (j in 1:1000) { E<-fisher.test(matrix(c(A[i][j],B[i][j],C[i][j],D[i][j]),2))#call fisher.test for every element } } It is so time-consuming Need vectorization Yours sincerely ZhaoXing Department of

Dear all, I have 3 matrices with the same dimension, A,B,C and I would like to produce a matrix D where in each position would retrieve the max(or min) value along A,B,C taken from the same position. I guess that apply functions should fit, but for matrices objects I am not getting it. thanks in advance, Diogo André Alagador [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R users, I want to check matrices when i change the order of the rows or/and the order of the columns or/and the combination of them i will give an example what i want  1  -1  1  1      1  1   1  1 -1  -1 -1 -1    -1 -1  -1  -1   1  1    1  1     1 -1    1   1 these 2 matrices are identical because i change the first row and make it third   1  -1  1  1      -1  1   1  1 -1  -1 -1

A list contains several matrices. Over all matrices (list elements) I'd like to access one matrix cell: m <- matrix(1:9, nrow=3, dimnames=list(LETTERS[1:3], letters[1:3])) l <- list(m1=m, m2=m*2, m3=m*3) l[[3]] # works l[[3]][1:2, ] # works l[[1:3]][1, 1] # does not work How can I slice all C-c combinations in the list? S?ren -- S?ren Vogel, Dipl.-Psych. (Univ.), PhD-Student, Eawag,

Hello, I have another stupid question. I hope you can give me a hint how to solve this: I have a list and one element is again a list containing matrices, all of the same dimensions. Now, I'd like to set the dimnames for all matrices: example code: m1 <- matrix(1:25, nrow=5) m2 <- matrix(26:50, nrow=5) # ... there can be much more than two matrices l <- list() l[[1]] <-

Hi R users: How can I built a direct sum function of matrices in R? I mean A(mxn), B(pxq), C(rxs),... X<-ds(A,B,C,...) X = [ A, 0, 0 0, B, 0 0, 0, C] ((m+p+r+...) x (n+q+s+...)) Thank you for your help. Kenneth -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

Good morning, I'm running into trouble rbind-ing numeric matrices with differing numbers of rows. In particular, there seem to be issues whenever a one-row numeric matrix is involved. Assume A is a numeric matrix with 1 row and Y columns and B is a numeric matrix with X rows and Y columns. Let C be the result of rbinding A and B. Then C is a numeric matrix with X + 1 rows and Y columns, only

Hi everyone, I'm having trouble applying the Cor() function to two matrices, both of which contain NAs. I am doing the following: a<-cor(m1, m2, use="complete.obs") ... and I get the following error message: Error in cor(m1, m2, use = "complete.obs") : no complete element pairs Does anyone know how I can apply a correlation, ignoring any NAs? Thanks, rcoder --

Hi, I have two matrices with 4885 cols and 36 cols respectively . I would like to extract these 36 columns from the bigger matrix, the column values are different but the column names would be the same.Hence based on the names I would like to perform my operation. So is there any way of extracting this info in an easy way. I have tried names,which,grep,subset none have worked. Could someone help