similar to: Encapsulated postscript and the family argument

I like the fact that the postscript function enables the possbiility of a more useful title than before. However, I'd prefer the default to be the file name. It's very simple for me to make my own postscript function that does just that simply by setting title = file. I always use onefile = TRUE, so it always works (so far). However, I'm a little reluctant to do that in case some

I like the fact that the postscript function enables the possbiility of a more useful title than before. However, I'd prefer the default to be the file name. It's very simple for me to make my own postscript function that does just that simply by setting title = file. I always use onefile = TRUE, so it always works (so far). However, I'm a little reluctant to do that in case some

I have several old encapsulated postscript graphics generated by R that I want to include in a LaTeX Beamer presentation so I want them in pdf. Under Ubuntu linux typing convert z.eps z.pdf (to use ImageMagick) results in a nice looking graphic but the bounding box is lost. Doing convert z.eps z.epdf results in a fuzzy image with a good bounding box. Does anyone have a nice solution?

Dear users, another question concerning graphics for publications. My favourite journal wants .eps-graphics, and from older postings i adapted the following code: postscript(file="Figure1.eps", title="Figure 1", width=11.5, height=8, paper="a4",onefile=FALSE) However,  when checking the properties of this file, it is a .ps and not a .eps file. So, i konverted to

Hi all, I've a problem with the size of the labels of my pie-charts when I try to write them to a postscript file. I need to increase the default size, so I change cex (see below). On screen this works fine, but cex doesn't seem to affect the postscript-file. Any suggestions? Thanks a lot, Daniel Copy/Past-example (will try to write to c:/temp!): labels <- c("I",

Dear all, I am using the following code to write the plot to an eps format postscript(file="test.eps",horizontal=FALSE)

Dear Colleagues: I need to make a graphic that uses the Nimbus rather than Helvetica font family so that the font can be embedded in the encapsulated postscript file. This is to satisfy a requirement from a journal for electronic submission of figures. I do the following: postscript('lowess.eps', onefile=FALSE, pointsize=18, horizontal=FALSE, family='NimbusSan')

I'm not shure but I guess that you miss a " and putted it in the wrong place! Try this: postscript("/pathto/filename.eps",horizontal=FALSE,onefile=FALSE) Hope It helps. -----Mensagem original----- De: r-help-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] Em nome de e-letter Enviada em: segunda-feira, 17 de agosto de 2009 10:11 Para: r-help at r-project.org

I've noticed that the postscript files produced by R-0.49 come up inverted in my postscript previewer. Also, they do not behave like encapsulated postscript files so they can't be imported into LaTeX documents. If I remove lines with page-oriented commands like "%%Page", "%%Orientation", "\bp" and "\ep", the resulting files seem to behave like

Hi, what is actually the best method to include R-plots into LaTeX documents? At the moment i use postscript("myplot.eps", width = 12.0, height = 9.0, horizontal = FALSE, onefile = TRUE, paper = "special",encoding = "TeXtext.enc") plot(foo,bar) dev.off() But it is a bit unhandy to scale later and its difficult to get nice formula in the plots. And how should

Hi, I have a puzzeling problem. I want to export graphics from R to TeX via postscript(). This works fine for some graphs, but for others, the eps remain empty when viewed with GSView. When such an empty eps is imported to TeX, the figure appears upside down and very small, irrespective of TeX width and height commands. If I transform the eps to pdf, the graphic shows up, but turned aqround 90°.

Hi all, I try to save graphic as eps file, but I have probles with quality. My graphics as pdf file is ok. The quality is very good. But when I save as eps the quality is very poor. I try convert pdf to eps file using others programs like adobe acrobat and the quality of eps is like pdf (file is larger than). I try lot of recommendation found in google and others lists. I used:

Greetings, I am new to R and quite confused by the apparent inconsistency in it's behavior. My latest difficulty lies in producing eps output for use with latex. In particular, I was successful in obtaining a single figure by using: postscript("ripple1.eps",onefile=FALSE) plot(nu_set[[1]],ip[[1]]) lines(nu_set[[1]],predict(fitIp[[1]])) dev.off() ...but then I tried to place two

Hi, I posted a while ago about 'overlap' problems using png/jpeg. If what Patrick Connolly suggests is truly happening, I think the following may be related. My new problem is with the following code (the overlap is still there if I use png() instead of postscript(), compounded by the difficulty described below): tmp <- matrix(runif(16000), nrow=16)

Dear all, I tried: > iris > species.n <- as.numeric(Species) > plot(iris, col = species.n) > savePlot(filename="IrisTestPlot", type="png") and got the error message: Fehler in savePlot(filename = "IrisTestPlot", type = "png") : kann nur aus 'X11(type="*cairo")' Devices kopieren (sorry, I have a german version of R). I

Hi, All; When I generate a "special" paper postscript image larger than "a4" or "letter" using R, I can only see one-page portion of all image, of course. What will be the simple solution for this? Is there any way I can set the bounding box information on the image? Or any other suggestions? Thanks in advance; Tae-Hoon Chung

HI, I would like to know if it's possible to create a postscript file with multiple graphs . I'm creating some graphs by the means of a loop and I want to save each graph in the same file (splitting making the device by the number of graphs). Do I have to use the par(matrix()) option, the layout() function or the split.screen() one ? Thanks Nolwenn

Dear R users: I assigned students to make some graphs and I'm having trouble answering some questions that they have. We are all working on R 2.1 on Fedora Core Linux 4 systems. 1. In the plot, the axis is not labeled by "numbers", but rather scientific notation like "-2e+08" or such. We realize that means -200,000,000. We want to beautify the plot. We would rather

Hi R-users, I am using "postscript("xx.eps", horizontal=FALSE, onefile=FALSE, height=6, width=10, pointsize=10)" and "barplot(xx.dat)" in R to produce EPS graphics for LATeX document. When checking the graphics with "gv" I see that it was not produced with full details. The main graphic is there, but axes labels and titles are missing. While checking the

Dear r-bugs, When I create EPS files, they sometimes appear rotated in my LaTeX PDF document and sometimes they don't. Two examples: ## x1.eps is not rotated in LaTeX x <- seq(-1, 1, length=100) postscript("c:/x1.eps", height=3, width=4, horizontal=FALSE, onefile=FALSE, paper="special") plot(x, dnorm(x), type="l") dev.off() ## x2.eps is not