similar to: Bibliofile, a Logging App for your Reading

Hi, I was wondering if there are any guidelines for the use of the R logo on websites which are for commercial use? Similar to http://www.python.org/community/logos/ for Python and to http://www.postgresql.org/community/propaganda for PostgreSQL perhaps? thanks, Jan

On Nov 19, 2015, at 3:49 PM, Devin Reade <gdr at gno.org> wrote: > > size of the disk was never the original motivation for > keeping / separate, at least within my memory Prior to SysV, the location of user home directories was not standardized, and AT&T recommended that you put them in /usr.[1] Also, in the PDP days, you had things like the RL and RK series drives, which

On Feb 10, 2008, at 12:25 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > Hi All, > > The first draft of the llvm 2.2 release notes are now available: > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html > > The release is scheduled for Monday, so please take a look at them and > send me your feedback, or (better yet) just commit fixes directly to > the document in llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.html. In

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 09:08:36PM +0000, Miguel Medalha via samba wrote: > > > On 13-03-2018 19:22, Karolin Seeger via samba-technical wrote: > > ======================================================== > > "It is time that we all see gender as a > > spectrum instead of two sets of > > opposing ideals. We should stop > > defining each other

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 09:08:36PM +0000, Miguel Medalha via samba wrote: > > > On 13-03-2018 19:22, Karolin Seeger via samba-technical wrote: > > ======================================================== > > "It is time that we all see gender as a > > spectrum instead of two sets of > > opposing ideals. We should stop > > defining each other

> This is a matter of presentation, but some of the "GCC extensions" are > standard C99 (now, at least). I noticed long long, C++-style comments > and designated initializers. > > I have plenty of complaints about the GCC documentation you're > pointing at, but this probably isn't the right forum for that. I do > think dropping "as fast as

On Feb 10, 2008, at 11:26 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> This is a matter of presentation, but some of the "GCC extensions" >> are >> standard C99 (now, at least). I noticed long long, C++-style >> comments >> and designated initializers. >> >> I have plenty of complaints about the GCC documentation you're >> pointing at, but this

On Wed, 1 Jan 2020, Gene Heskett wrote: > But I should preface this with the fact that I have a 20kw nat gas fired > standby with a sub 10 second startup time in the back yard. > > The ups really should be smart enough to take a delayed shutdown command > and be able to do without further commanding from the monitoring nut > running machine, something I would think on the

Every time I send an e-mail to the * list, I receive this "AntiSpam UOL" E-mail. is anybody else experiencing the same? How can I get rid of it? Uriel -----Original Message----- From: AntiSpam UOL [mailto:andersoncbr.sspam@uol.com.br] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:51 PM To: uriel@adelphia.net Subject: RE:RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP / GrandStream Configuration Ol?,

Hi all, I apologize for this off-topic question but I need your help -- I know there are lots of experts here. As a lover and student of statistics, I am thinking of building a tree of various branches of statistics and keeping track of the greatest historical inventions/discoveries in statistics and the latest development of each branch. The goal is to understand in what context did the great

Feature Requests item #20367, was opened at 26/05/2008 16:32 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=221&aid=20367&group_id=35 Category: Missing class(es) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Pascal Hurni (phi) Assigned to: Kevin Smith (qualitycode) Summary: wxToolBarTool (wxToolBarToolBase) missing, thus anti-OO Initial Comment: The

Woooow! Kick this guy out from this list and pls filter *@uol.com.br It's very annoying.... Isamar ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 08:48:45 -0300 (BRT) From: AntiSpam UOL <andersoncbr.sspam@uol.com.br> To: isamar@isamarmaia.org Subject: RE:RE: [Asterisk-Users] G729 experiences.. [antispam_txt.gif] Ol=E1, Voc=EA enviou uma mensagem para

On 1/2/2020 3:12 AM, Roger Price wrote: > On Wed, 1 Jan 2020, Gene Heskett wrote: >> But I should preface this with the fact that I have a 20kw nat gas >> fired standby with a sub 10 second startup time in the back yard. >> >> The ups really should be smart enough to take a delayed shutdown >> command and be able to do without further commanding from the >>

On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 11:57 +0000, John Hodrien wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Peter Duffy wrote: > > https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/systemd#Why_Debian_should_default_to_systemd > Might be more convincing if they stuck to reasoned argument, rather than propaganda. "Systemd is straightforward"; "systemd is incredibly fast (1 second to boot)" - reminds me

This isn't the typical r-help post, but I think people here will appreciate it. The current Shirt.Woot (http://shirt.woot.com) derby prompt is fake band names, so I chose the name "The Probable Error of a Mean." And I made my submission with R. Here it is: http://www.thomaslevine.org/the_probable_error_of_a_mean/poster.png http://shirt.woot.com/Derby/Entry.aspx?id=33029 I'm

Hai Manu, Ok, so even the driver link in the email did not work on win 10 x64? The one which did work for me? I can delete that hp up 6.5 driver and re-install it again and again. Send my regard to your students ;-) Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Manu Baylac [mailto:manu at ldd.fr] > Verzonden: woensdag 8 november 2017 22:10 > Aan: samba at

All, seems I too am suffering from posts to the list and being accused of SPAMing .... -----Original Message----- From: AntiSpam UOL [mailto:andersoncbr.sspam@uol.com.br] Sent: 26 September 2003 20:48 To: alow@prioritytelecom.com Subject: RE:RE: [Asterisk-Users] RTP routing.. <http://antispam.uol.com.br> <http://mail.i.uol.com.br/tirateima_txt.gif>

I was looking at the the way that ssh calculates an hmac, and I noticed that the ordering is a little strange - it does hash(key+message). Shouldn't this rather be hash(message+key)? In the former situation, it could be possible for an attacker to append something to the end of the data being sent. The attacker would be able to calculate a valid hmac without knowing the key. For instance,

Problem: I am attempting to set my Samba server to be a PDC. Everytime I try to connect my XP Pro laptop (used for testing purposes) to the domain, I receiver the following error: The following error occurred attempting to join domain "mis": Multiple connections to a server or shared resource by the same user, using more than one user name, are not allowed. Disconnect all previous

Problem: I am attempting to set my Samba server to be a PDC. Everytime I try to connect my XP Pro laptop (used for testing purposes) to the domain, I receiver the following error: The following error occurred attempting to join domain "mis": Multiple connections to a server or shared resource by the same user, using more than one user name, are not allowed. Disconnect all previous