similar to: equivalence test

Bonjour, Je voudrais tester l'homosc?dasdicit? entre des groupes. J'aurais alors aim? savoir quelle ?tait l'hypoth?se nulle du test de bartlett. Merci pour votre aide. Matthieu. ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The\ s...{{dropped}}

I'm running Dovecot on a Debian system which recently has been failing on an assert(). I have a spam mailbox that if I try and open (from any client), the imap process dies and this is written to the error logs: Dec 21 18:57:11 theronge imap(mronge): file imap-bodystructure.c: line 278 (part_parse_headers): assertion failed: (part->physical_pos >= input->v_offset -

Bonjour, Je suis actuellement doctorant (en fin de th?se) et je vais avoir besoin de me servir de R. Devant apprendre R tout seul, je suis tomb? sur un mail de vous disant que vous aviez r?aliser un tutorial sur ce logiciel pour des 100% d?butant comme moi J'aurai essentiellement ? utiliser des algo de clustering (SOM ou Nu?e dyna) sur des matrices pouvant faire 41x230 Cependant je

Anton, I didn't know that EQUIVALENCE is the only unsupported major Fortran feature, as this bug says. Can you give me an update on the status of the Fortran front-end and what the near-term goals are? I am getting more requests from academics doing HPC compilers and it would be useful to know where Fortran support stands. Other llvmdev'ers may be interested too. Thanks,

Vikram, > I didn't know that EQUIVALENCE is the only unsupported major Fortran > feature, as this bug says. Can you give me an update on the status of > the Fortran front-end and what the near-term goals are? Ok. I was going to post something soon after 2.2 release, but let's do it now. LLVM 2.2 will contain (as a part of llvm-gcc 4.2) a port of gfortran compiler to the LLVM

I have several machines that must have trusted root accounts, that is, I need to be able to run "ssh targethost command" on each by each, for the root user. I have had no success thus far doing so. Normally for the non-root users, all I have to do is set the /etc/ssh/known_hosts, build up the users' ~/.ssh/known_hosts, and the users will work without requiring passwords. (I'm

Please, How to certify me that I am installing the CentOS equivalent to RHEL 3 update1 or update2? Thanks, Zamil Machado Cavalcanti Bahia - BRAZIL Linux Counter #56812 http://counter.li.org

I'm trying to get a backup system going using rsync --- bit of a newbie. Just wondering if there is a way I can get rsync to recognise that a non-gzipped file in one directory tree is equivalent to the same gzipped file in the (say backup) tree, or vice versa. Could this be done with the include/exclude features? I note that gzip doesn't alter the timestamp on a file when it zips

Hi all, The Kruskal-Wallis test is a generalization of the two-sample Mann-Whitney test to *k* samples. That being the case, the Kruskal-Wallis test with *k*=2 should give an identical p-value to the Mann-Whitney test, should it not? x1<-c(1:5) x2<-c(6,8,9,11) a<-wilcox.test(x1,x2,paired=FALSE) b<-kruskal.test(list(x1,x2),paired=FALSE) a$p.value [1] 0.01587302 b$p.value [1]

Simple example: # Classification Tree with rpart library(rpart) # grow tree fit <- rpart(Kyphosis ~ Age + Number + Start, method="class", data=kyphosis) Now I would like to know how can I measure the "importance" of each of my three explanatory variables (Age, Number, Start) in the model? If this was a regression model, I could have looked at p values from the

Hi, I've got one silly question for evening. I don't know is this reasonable, but can test with two the most extreme proportions from the samples could be good enough evidence for testing equivalence, or should I have to look for something else...? -- Mi³ego dnia [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

/etc/postfix/main.cf.default: mailbox_delivery_lock = flock, dotlock Is flock equivalent to dovecot's fnctl locking? For mbox what type of locking settings should I be using? (No NFS, only local filesystem.) Warren Togami warren at togami.com

Hi! is there a way in R to check whether the outcome of two different experiments is statistically distinguishable or indistinguishable? More preciously, I used the wilcoxon test to determine the differences between controls and treated subjects for two different experiments. Now I would like to check whether the two lists of analytes obtained are statistically distinguishable or

On 8/10/2017 8:34 AM, Dennis F. Kahlbaum wrote: > -- snip -- I don't have real help, but I'll remind you that R is case sensitive, and it looks like that will be at least one problem in the solution your are working on below: lme not LME data not DATA random = RANDOM > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > The R code I've devised for the

Hello Folks Can anyone help with why I can use ssh like so: [root@morgansoldmachine ~]# ssh -t rsync@192.168.1.40 sudo ssh -i /home/rsync/.ssh/id_dsa root@192.168.1.100 Last login: Tue Mar 24 21:32:51 2009 from morgansmachine.lan [root@morgansoldmachine ~]# logout Connection to 192.168.1.100 closed. Connection to 192.168.1.40 closed. [root@morgansoldmachine ~]# But, when I use the same

Hello, helpeRs, I recently used a linear mixed effects model followed by ANOVA to assess the relationship between a categorical predictor variable with 2 levels (and random effects) and a numeric response variable. As I was concerned about the lack of a power analysis prior to data collection, it was suggested that I use an equivalence test to complement the conventional hypothesis test.

Is copy.0 semantically equivalent to copy.1 in the following example? define void @copy.0(i8 addrspace(1)* addrspace(1)* %src, i8 addrspace(1)* addrspace(1)* %dst) { entry: %val = load i8 addrspace(1)* addrspace(1)* %src store i8 addrspace(1)* %val, i8 addrspace(1)* addrspace(1)* %dst ret void } define void @copy.1(i8 addrspace(1)* addrspace(1)* %src, i8 addrspace(1)* addrspace(1)* %dst)

> On Aug 11, 2017, at 7:56 AM, Dennis F. Kahlbaum <kbomb at umich.edu> wrote: > > Hi Robert: > > Thanks for your response, as well. > > I'm sorry. As you've discovered, I made some capitalization errors when posting my R code. The actual R code does use "lme", "data", and "random". > > The dataframe is indeed named

Dear Dennis, Your question assumes that people know both SAS PROC MIXED and R nlme. Only a limited number of people do. Add the mathematical formulation of the model. That will increase the number of people that can help you. Adding the number of levels in each categorical variable and the number of observation per group is useful too. Best regards, ir. Thierry Onkelinx Instituut voor natuur-

We are getting some pushback from our SA group regarding root having ssh user equivalence on the cluster where we run OCFS2. Is it required to have the ssh user equivalence setup for the root user when running OCFS2 ? Thanks in advance, Reid Reid McKinley ******************************************************************************************** This message, including any