similar to: basic question on getGroups for lme analyses

Hi! First I would like to thank you for the help with my first question. However,I am afraid I am still into trouble. I think I have properly used the getGropus commad but seems to be a fatal error when calculating the fixed effects (see bellow) and I cannot understand why. Any inputs? Thanks in advance, /Jose hongos1=read.table("c:/temp/hongos1.txt", header=T) > attach(hongos1)

Hello, I saw that parallel-readdir was an experimental feature in GlusterFS version 3.10.0, became stable in version 3.11.0, and is now recommended for small file workloads in the Red Hat Gluster Storage Server documentation[2]. I've successfully enabled this on one of my volumes but I notice the following in the client mount log: [2018-01-23 10:24:24.048055] W [MSGID: 101174]

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com> > To: "Alan Orth" <alan.orth at gmail.com> > Cc: "gluster-users" <gluster-users at gluster.org> > Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2018 7:31:30 AM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] parallel-readdir is not recognized in GlusterFS 3.12.4 > > Adding

Adding devs who work on it On 23 Jan 2018 10:40 pm, "Alan Orth" <alan.orth at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I saw that parallel-readdir was an experimental feature in GlusterFS > version 3.10.0, became stable in version 3.11.0, and is now recommended for > small file workloads in the Red Hat Gluster Storage Server > documentation[2]. I've successfully

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alan Orth" <alan.orth at gmail.com> > To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowdapp at redhat.com> > Cc: "gluster-users" <gluster-users at gluster.org> > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 1:37:40 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] parallel-readdir is not recognized in GlusterFS 3.12.4 > > Thank you,

Thank you, Raghavendra. I guess this cosmetic fix will be in 3.12.6? I'm also looking forward to seeing stability fixes to parallel-readdir and or readdir-ahead in 3.12.x. :) Cheers, On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:26 AM Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp at redhat.com> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at

By the way, on a slightly related note, I'm pretty sure either parallel-readdir or readdir-ahead has a regression in GlusterFS 3.12.x. We are running CentOS 7 with kernel-3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86_6. I updated my servers and clients to 3.12.4 and enabled these two options after reading about them in the 3.10.0 and 3.11.0 release notes. In the days after enabling these two options all of my

Dear Vlad, I'm sorry, I don't want to test this again on my system just yet! It caused too much instability for my users and I don't have enough resources for a development environment. The only other variables that changed before the crashes was the group metadata-cache[0], which I enabled the same day as the parallel-readdir and readdir-ahead options: $ gluster volume set homes

Hello, ? ? Will we also suffer from this regression in any of the (previously) fixed 3.10 releases? We kept 3.10 and hope to stay stable :/ Regards Jo ? ? -----Original message----- From:Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> Sent:Tue 23-01-2018 05:15 Subject:Re: [Gluster-users] BUG: After stop and start wrong port is advertised To:Alan Orth <alan.orth at gmail.com>; CC:Jo

Ouch! Yes, I see two port-related fixes in the GlusterFS 3.12.3 release notes[0][1][2]. I've attached a tarball of all yesterday's logs from /var/log/glusterd on one the affected nodes (called "wingu3"). I hope that's what you need. [0] https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/release-3.12/doc/release-notes/3.12.3.md [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507747

Dear list, I noticed that GlusterFS 11 introduces a new "simple quota" system. According to the pull request? the implementation is based on Amar's earlier proposal? and is inspired by work they did in Kadalu. Other than that I don't see any documentation or discussion about these features. Specifically, it seems that the implementation relies on the quota features of the

can you please test parallel-readdir or readdir-ahead gives disconnects? so we know which to disable parallel-readdir doing magic ran on pdf from last year https://events.static.linuxfound.org/sites/events/files/slides/Gluster_DirPerf_Vault2017_0.pdf -v On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 8:20 AM, Alan Orth <alan.orth at gmail.com> wrote: > By the way, on a slightly related note, I'm pretty

So from the logs what it looks to be a regression caused by commit 635c1c3 ( and the good news is that this is now fixed in release-3.12 branch and should be part of 3.12.5. Commit which fixes this issue: COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/19146 committed in release-3.12 by \"Atin Mukherjee\" <amukherj at redhat.com> with a commit message- glusterd: connect to an existing brick

We recently had a strange NFS performance anomaly between a V880 running snv_124 and two NetApp filers. To investigate, a DTrace NFSv4 (and eventually NFSv3) client provider would been extremely helpful. Unfortunately, all I could find were a request for code review of a v3 client provider and another request for help developing a v4 provider. Nothing seems to have come from those initiatives,

On 12/06/19 1:38 PM, Alan Orth wrote: > Dear Ravi, > > Thanks for the confirmation?I replaced a brick in a volume last night > and by the morning I see that Gluster has replicated data there, > though I don't have any indication of its progress. The `gluster v > heal volume info` and `gluster v heal volume info split-brain` are all > looking good so I guess that's

3.10 doesn't have this regression, so you're safe. On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Jo Goossens <jo.goossens at hosted-power.com> wrote: > Hello, > > > > > > Will we also suffer from this regression in any of the (previously) fixed > 3.10 releases? We kept 3.10 and hope to stay stable :/ > > > > Regards > > Jo > > > > > >

Hi, R users, I'm using the "lme" function in R to estimate a 2 level mixed effects model, in which the size of the subject groups are different. It turned out that It takes forever for R to converge. I also tried the same thing in SPSS and SPSS can give the results out within 20 minutes. Anyone can give me some advice on the lme function in R, especially why R does not converge?

Adding Poornima to take a look at it and comment. On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:39 PM, Alan Orth <alan.orth at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I saw that parallel-readdir was an experimental feature in GlusterFS > version 3.10.0, became stable in version 3.11.0, and is now recommended for > small file workloads in the Red Hat Gluster Storage Server > documentation[2].

Hi, lme() users, Can some one tell me how to do this. I model Orthodont with the same G for random variables, but different R{i}'s for boys and girls, so that I can get sigma1_square_hat for boys and sigma2_square_hat for girls. The model is Y{i}=X{i}beta + Z{i}b + e{i} b ~ iid N(0,G) and e{i} ~ iid N(0,R{i}) i=1,2 orth.lme <- lme(distance ~ Sex * age, data=Orthodont, random=~age|Subject,

Dear list, In a recent discussion on this list Ravi suggested that the documentation for replace-brick? was out of date. For a distribute?replicate volume the documentation currently says that we need to kill the old brick's PID, create a temporary empty directory on the FUSE mount, check the xattrs, replace-brick with commit force. Is all this still necessary? I'm running Gluster 5.6 on