similar to: Code Help

Hello, I am the developer of Clover, and so much activity about OpenCL these days is really exciting. Here is my point of view, mainly on Clover and how the projects could use each other. Clover is made in a way that allow a certain level of modularity. Although POCL would be very difficult to merge into Clover (or Clover into POCL), as these two projects are nearly exactly doing the same things

After pipe_grid_info.indirect was introduced, clover was not modified to set it causing it to pass uninitialized memory for it to launch_grid. This commit fixes this by zero-ing the entire pipe_grid_info struct when declaring it, to avoid similar problems popping-up in the future. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> --- src/gallium/state_trackers/clover/core/kernel.cpp |

Hi, On 14-03-16 14:01, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: > > > On 03/14/2016 01:50 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> After pipe_grid_info.indirect was introduced, clover was not modified >> to set it causing it to pass uninitialized memory for it to launch_grid. >> >> This commit fixes this by zero-ing the entire pipe_grid_info struct when >> declaring it, to avoid similar

After pipe_grid_info.indirect was introduced, clover was not modified to set it causing it to pass uninitialized memory for it to launch_grid. This commit fixes this by zero-ing the entire pipe_grid_info struct when declaring it, to avoid similar problems popping-up in the future. Cc: "11.2" <mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at

After pipe_grid_info.indirect was introduced, clover was not modified to set it causing it to pass uninitialized memory for it to launch_grid. This commit fixes this by zero-ing the entire pipe_grid_info struct when declaring it, to avoid similar problems popping-up in the future. Cc: "11.2" <mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at

On 03/14/2016 02:29 PM, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: > > > On 03/14/2016 02:26 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 14-03-16 14:01, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 03/14/2016 01:50 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >>>> After pipe_grid_info.indirect was introduced, clover was not modified >>>> to set it causing it to pass

Hi Carlos, On 10/20/11 9:54 AM, Carlos Sánchez de La Lama wrote: >> The project started as a use-case for our "Whole-Function Vectorization" >> library, which allows to transform a function to compute the same as W >> executions of the original code by using SIMD instructions (W = 4 for >> SSE/AltiVec, 8 for AVX). > > Quite interesting. We were planning to

Hi all, I am facing difficulty on how to use bootstrap sampling and below is my example of function. Read a data , use some functions and use iteration to find the solution( ie, convergence is reached). I want to use bootstrap approach to do it several times (200 or 300 times) this whole process and see the distribution of parameter of interest. Below is a small example that resembles my

Hi Ralf, > The project started as a use-case for our "Whole-Function Vectorization" > library, which allows to transform a function to compute the same as W > executions of the original code by using SIMD instructions (W = 4 for > SSE/AltiVec, 8 for AVX). Quite interesting. We were planning to add "vectorization" to our passes also, but if I understood the

On 2018-02-21 — 14:55, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: > On 02/21/2018 12:15 AM, Tomeu Vizoso via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hi, > > > > for a few months already I have been asking around for opinions on how > > people could best work together on Khronos' SPIR-V <-> LLVM-IR converter > > and some consensus seems to have formed. > > > > Most of the

On 02/21/2018 03:34 PM, Pierre Moreau wrote: > On 2018-02-21 — 14:55, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: >> On 02/21/2018 12:15 AM, Tomeu Vizoso via llvm-dev wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> for a few months already I have been asking around for opinions on how >>> people could best work together on Khronos' SPIR-V <-> LLVM-IR converter >>> and

Do we have a list of these open-source LLVM-based OpenCL projects somewhere? Off the top of my head, we have: libclc: http://www.pcc.me.uk/~peter/libclc/ pocl: https://launchpad.net/pocl clover: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~steckdenis/clover/ (I think that all of these have BSD- or MIT-style licenses). Are there any others? -Hal On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 14:47 +0100, Peter Collingbourne wrote:

Hi everybody, the compiler design lab at Saarland University (chair of Sebastian Hack) is also working on an LLVM-based OpenCL driver. The project started as a use-case for our "Whole-Function Vectorization" library, which allows to transform a function to compute the same as W executions of the original code by using SIMD instructions (W = 4 for SSE/AltiVec, 8 for AVX). The

> It's important to demonstrate that there is a developer community backing > the tool and that it won't be abandoned if it is added as an llvm > sub-project. > > -Tom Just to complete the picture, this is an initiative from within Khronos Group to unify our effort to make this available as an LLVM component. A number of companies have been involved in the original

> This is great to see. Is this code the basis of the forks that Anastasia talked about or did those come from somewhere else? Yes, indeed the base is https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-LLVM/ and then there are multiple forks that include some rework as well (some of which were announced on the LLVM channels). I think the biggest problems we are trying to solve is: 1. Keeping up to date

Ralf, What version of the SDK were you using for your analysis? I don't see that in the slides/pdf. Thanks, Micah > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of Ralf Karrenberg > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 2:13 PM > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] ANN: libclc (OpenCL C

Ben, I would like to test the sulfur on the clover field, nitrogen on the clover field and then test for the presence of interaction. Sorry about the last email, seems it really screwed itself over, here it is again, hopefully nicer: Nitrogen(0) Nitrogen(20) Sulfur(0) 4.54 5.73 Sulfur(3) 4.64

Hi Micah, The numbers from the paper were measured with the ATI Stream SDK v2.1 (it's only mentioned in the references I think). The most recent measurements I have were done with the current v2.5. Best, Ralf Am 19.10.2011 23:43, schrieb Villmow, Micah: > Ralf, > What version of the SDK were you using for your analysis? I don't see that in the slides/pdf. > > Thanks, >

On 02/26/2018 09:25 AM, Anastasia Stulova wrote: > >> This is great to see. Is this code the basis of the forks that Anastasia > talked about or did those come from somewhere else? > > > Yes, indeed the base is https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-LLVM/ and then there are multiple forks that include some rework as well (some of which were announced on the LLVM channels).

Hi Daniel, In r172749 you removed the Linker::LinkInFiles() function and mentioned in the commit message that users of this function should migrate to "platform-specific linker-integrated LTO mechanisms, or the forthcoming LLVM linker." I'm trying to update this code: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/tree/src/gallium/state_trackers/clover/llvm/invocation.cpp to work with TOT