similar to: Help regarding C/C++ usage ..

Hi , I have c++ server application in solaries 10 . Day by day memory usage is growing i try to find memory leaks with MDB and DTRACE and no leaks found. how can we find reason for growing memory , can we know which memory sigment is cause for growing memory usage Thanks in Advance. Rao -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

I am trying to translate code from S-PLUS to R and R really struggles! After starting R with the foll. R --vsize 50M --nsize 6M --no-restore on a 400 MHz Pentium with 192 MB of memory running Linux (RH 6.2), I run a function that essentially picks up an external dataset with 2121 rows and 30 columns and builds a lm() object and also runs step() ... the step() takes forever to run...(takes very

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 4:58 AM Venkataramanan Kumar < venkataramanan.kumar.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I tired to see when this behavior changed in LLVM. > It seems to start from. > --snip-- > commit 95e5d37d5868ebde2302bc302c1e0af407c5646d > Author: Sebastian Pop <sebpop at gmail.com> > Date: Tue Mar 6 21:55:59 2018 +0000 > > DA: remove

Hi, For the below test case, I need the dependence distance between the array references "a[j][i]" and "a[j-1][i-2]". --Snip-- int a[5][5]; int b[10]; void test() { for (int j=1;j<5;j++) for (int i=2;i<5;i++) { a[j][i] = 3.0; b[i]= a[j-1][i-2] ; } } --Snip-

Hi folks: I am just beginning to try and use R from my own C programs. Platform is Windows2000, compiler Visual C++ 6.0. I built the import library R.lib from R.dll using the VC LIB.exe program. Here is a simple code I am trying to compile and run (no C++, VC++ is instructed to treat it strictly as C): #include "R.h" #include "Rinternals.h" int main(void) { int i; char

Hi. I want to install VC++ on wine, but I am currently doing it on a linux server without GUI, and X11 tunneling doesn't work either. so is there any other way I can install VC++ Runtime files? (I need both 2005 AND 2008)

I'm not sure you understand the problem. Are you saying that a file compiled with mingw can catch an exception thrown by a file compiled with VC++ when the two are linked into a single program? That a program compiled with mingw can be linked against the VC++ runtime and *not* the mingw/gcc runtime? Linking against system DLLs is very different from what I'm talking about. Adam

On Friday 18 February 2005 11:40 am, Jeff Cohen wrote: > I'm not sure you understand the problem. I wouldn't be surprised :) > Are you saying that a file > compiled with mingw can catch an exception thrown by a file compiled > with VC++ when the two are linked into a single program? That a program > compiled with mingw can be linked against the VC++ runtime and *not*

I'm afraid that still does not completely answer the question. I'll accept that it will work for C programs, given what you quote. It says nothing about C++ however. That's a different animal entirely. g++ mangles names in a completely different fashion than VC++. Does mingw use VC++ style mangling? g++ processes exceptions in a completely different fashion than VC++. I

Greetings, I know that most people on here are strong advocates of Unix or a similar OS, but I am interested in calling C++ or using C++ to call R. What is the preferred or the compiler that works the best. In the documentation it appears that VC++ is recommended, but in some posts I have seen statements that claim VC++ is not recommended. I have a DEV C++ IDE, but I would like to borrow from

GCC is smart enough to realize it doesn't return. That's because the declaration of abort() is decorated with __attribute__((__noreturn__)). So is GCC smarter than VC++? As it turns out, in VC++ the declaration of abort() is decorated with __declspec(noreturn). Whidbey is not stricter than 2003, it is merely buggier. VC++ has always complained about functions failing to return a

gcc is correct. According to the ISO specification, the for-init-statement is supposed to inject any variable names into the same declarative scope as the condition of an equivalent restructuring of the loop in the form of a while statement, which in turn fronts the declaration to an extra scope that surrounds the /entire/ loop construct. VC++ seems to be scoping the variables as if they were

> On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, [ISO-8859-2] Žiga Osolin wrote: >> The other thing are the return types. I don't know (it is probably even >> not documented) how VC++ returns smart pointer (boost::smart_ptr), >> or any other type (other basics types, such as int, float, ... are >> probably returned into EAX as with GCC). Once again, we may >> need specific return values

Taken from tools/llvmc2/CompilationGraph.cpp: ... for (typename C::const_iterator B = EdgesContainer.begin(), E = EdgesContainer.end(); B != E; ++B) { const Edge* E = B->getPtr(); ... MS C++ compiler (VS 2008) gives: ... CompilationGraph.cpp ..\..\..\llvm\tools\llvmc2\CompilationGraph.cpp(58) : error C2371: 'E' : redefinition; different basic types

Hello! I have a question how about JIT-ed code and the C++ compiler compatibily. My project (www.baadengine.org) will use llvm and we will provide integration of JIT-ed code directly into C++ code. This means that C++ code can call JIT code just like any other code and JIT-ed code can call C++ code. We will compile to your bytecode from our BSF format. The question is if it is possible this

> GCC is smart enough to realize it doesn't return. That's because the > declaration of abort() is decorated with __attribute__((__noreturn__)). > > So is GCC smarter than VC++? As it turns out, in VC++ the declaration of > abort() is decorated with __declspec(noreturn). > > Whidbey is not stricter than 2003, it is merely buggier. VC++ has always > complained

On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, [ISO-8859-2] Žiga Osolin wrote: > The other thing are the return types. I don't know (it is probably even > not documented) how VC++ returns smart pointer (boost::smart_ptr), > or any other type (other basics types, such as int, float, ... are > probably returned into EAX as with GCC). Once again, we may > need specific return values per arhitecture. It is

Jay Freeman (saurik) wrote: > gcc is correct. According to the ISO specification, the for-init-statement > is supposed to inject any variable names into the same declarative scope as > the condition of an equivalent restructuring of the loop in the form of a > while statement, which in turn fronts the declaration to an extra scope that > surrounds the /entire/ loop construct.

On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, [ISO-8859-2] Žiga Osolin wrote: > The problem is this is not possible, because what I would compile to JIT > are actual classes. The integration of C++ and JIT code is very > important; for example we would create our own vtbls with JIT-ed code > addresses as the function call target. Ok. Realize that this ties you to a specific compiler version though. >

Which is the Kernel API (Xenbus API) that is available to do a similar action as "xenstore-chmod"?? Thx, Venkat _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel