similar to: installing the XML package

Dear R users, Prof. Ripley just corrected my understanding of the use of weights in glm, which I thought would allow me to correctly use lmer. However I'm still having problems. My data takes the form of # of infected and uninfected individuals that were measured over time under different treatments. I'm using lmer to adjust for the repeated measures over time. In fitting the

Hello, I am a new R user. I am trying to calculate vector correlations for all pairwise comparisons in my data frame without repeats. I am familiar with the expand.grid function, but this includes repeats. Is there a way to use expand.grid and eliminate repeats? Or is there another function that can be used to do this? Thank you. Rebecca -- Rebecca Young Graduate Student Ecology &

platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 os mingw32 system i386, mingw32 status major 1 minor 7.1 year 2003 month 06 day 16 language R I have a Dell Inspiron 4000 laptop with Windows ME. I recently installed the 1.7 version of R. The following commands are from my

Greetings, I'm in the painful process of migrating from SAS to R. In the process I've discovered that there are some basic things that I am getting hung up on. The most basic is the simple recoding of variables. Suppose I create a vector x <- rnorm(10000) and I want to recode all values of x > 1.5 to NA. How would I do that in R? TIA Cheers, Patrick

Hello, Can you get eigenvalues in addition to eigevectors using prcomp? If so how? I am unable to use princomp due to small sample sizes. Thank you in advance for your help! Rebecca Young -- Rebecca Young Graduate Student Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Badyaev Lab University of Arizona 1041 E Lowell Tucson, AZ 85721-0088 Office: 425BSW rlyoung at email.arizona.edu (520) 621-4005

I tried using this flag and it gave me errors on code that otherwise assembles and runs just fine (using the version of Gcra.cpp that Lang wrote). So I'm wondering if I should really be using the flag? I'm using it like this: llc -verify-machineinstrs -load Debug/lib/P4.so -regalloc=gc xxx.bc Susan On 11/15/2012 01:13 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2012, at

________________________________ Title: Scientific Programmer ? Simulation Analysis Salary: $50-70k/y Full Description and Application Portal: https://uacareers.com/postings/31668 We seek a scientific programmer to join the agricultural data science initiative at the University of Arizona. Our team is responsible for developing automated pipelines for data collection, simulation modeling,

Hi sri, As your problem involves a few logical steps, I found it easier to approach it in a stepwise way. Perhaps there are more elegant ways to accomplish this. svdat<-read.table(text="Count id name type 117 335 sally A 19 335 sally A 167 335 sally B 18 340 susan A 56 340 susan A 22 340 susan B 53 340 susan B 135 351 lee A 114 351 lee A 84 351 lee A 80 351 lee A 19 351 lee A 8 351 lee A

Dear All, I am trying to reshape the data with some conditions. A small part of the data looks like below. Like this there will be more data with repeating ID. Count id name type 117 335 sally A 19 335 sally A 167 335 sally B 18 340 susan A 56 340 susan A 22 340 susan B 53 340 susan B 135 351 lee A 114 351 lee A 84 351 lee A 80 351 lee A 19 351 lee A 8 351 lee A 21 351 lee A 88 351 lee B 111 351

susan@susan:~/.wine/dosdevices/e:$ wine setup.exe susan@susan:~/.wine/dosdevices/e:$ fixme:seh:check_no_exec No-exec fault triggered at 0x1a082000, enabling work-around err:ntdll:RtlpWaitForCriticalSection section 0xa5125590 "?" wait timed out in thread 0012, blocked by 0000, retrying (60 sec) susan@susan:~/.wine/dosdevices/e:$ err:ntdll:RtlpWaitForCriticalSection section 0xa5125590

Hi Susan, The problem is that the allocator is re-using the 'preg', which is calculated for an operand that may have a subreg index, for loads and stores to a stack-slot. The stack slot always has the same width as vreg (which is the right behavior), but for operands with subreg indexes, 'preg''s class will be different from 'vreg', in which case you get the mismatched

Hi Susan, Jakob pointed out to me that the Gcra.cpp allocator doesn't record basic-block live-ins, which are used by the verifier to check correctness. You can record which variables are live into a basic block with MachineBasicBlock::addLiveIn(unsigned physReg). I don't know the verifier well, but if it's using other built in infrastructure for register allocation then it may not be

<head><style>body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}</style></head><body id="compText">>I downloaded today''s git, compiled --enable-win64, and installed. <br>>The command "wine64 notepad" produces notepad, and everything seems fine. <br>>But then I

My tst.bc is attached. I had to use ssh to copy it from my office machine to my home laptop. In case that corrupts it, I also put a copy here: http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~horwitz/LANG/tst.bc I created the file like this: clang -emit-llvm -O0 -c tst.c -o tst.bc opt -mem2reg tst.bc > tst.mem2reg mv tst.mem2reg tst.bc Susan On 11/4/2012 3:27 PM, Lang Hames wrote: > Hi Susan, >

Hi Jim, Thanks for your time. But somehow this code did not help me to achieve my expected output. Problems: 1) x, y are coming as logical rather than values as I mentioned in my post 2) The values that I get for Max A and Max B not correct 3) It looks like a pretty big data, but I just need to concatenate the values with a comma, the final output will be a character

Hi Susan, It looks like the bitcode you have attached is corrupted. You should make sure to attach it as a binary file. Alternatively you can attach the LLVM assembly as text. You can generate an assembly file from bitcode with: llvm-dis -o <asm file> <bitcode> Regards, Lang. On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Susan Horwitz <horwitz at cs.wisc.edu> wrote: > Thanks Lang,

Sorry about that. I created the assembly file and attached it (as math.txt). Susan On 11/11/2012 12:41 AM, Lang Hames wrote: > Hi Susan, > > It looks like the bitcode you have attached is corrupted. You should > make sure to attach it as a binary file. Alternatively you can attach > the LLVM assembly as text. You can generate an assembly file from > bitcode with: > >

Hi Lang, I looked more into one of the problems I'm now having, and I've attached 3 files: Gcra.cpp is like your version except that for two specific vregs it uses hard-coded pregs instead of the first in the corresponding class. bug1.c is an input that causes the failed assertion for me. If I use the non-debug version of LLVM-3.1 I instead get assembler errors like this: Error:

Hi Susan, With your bitcode file I am now able to reproduce the issue you're seeing. It looks like this is a problem with the naive rewriting from virtregs to physregs. It appears that the subreg field of physreg operands is ignored post-register allocation. In your testcase %vreg11:sub32 is being rewritten to RBX:sub32, but the :sub32 part is being quietly dropped when the assembly is

Thanks Lang! Here's another question: I'm trying to process this input: int main() { return 0; } but I'm getting an error Assertion `!Fn.getRegInfo().getNumVirtRegs() && "Regalloc must assign all vregs"' failed. At the start of runOnMachineFunction I call Fn.getRegInfo().getNumVirtRegs(); and find that there is 1 virtual register. However,