similar to: How to access R primitives in C code?

Hey again folks ;-) Seems my auth is working afterall when I telnet to the IMAP port. But darned if I can get it working with Horde web mail. Is anyone out there doing this just first of all to confirm to me that the combination works OK. I don't care so much about shadow auth since apparantly my pam auth is working just fine. thanks, -Alan -- "True Budo is done for the sake of

Hey folks, Let me start by saying I really love what I see so far! Dovecot seems to be extremely feature-rich, and unlike a lot of free software the documentation is extremely good! I gave up on courier IMAP because of the poor documentation, and I have to say Dovecot sure differentiates itself in that area! Unfortunately I still can't get it going :-/ First thing I noticed is that

I have two questions about packaging up code. 1) Weave/tangle advisable? In the course of extending some C code already in S, I had to work out the underlying math. It seems to me useful to keep this information with the code, using Knuth's tangle/weave type tools. I know there is some support for this in R code, but my question is about the wisdow of doing this with C (or Fortran, or other

Author: eschrock Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: e5f70a6fc5010aa205f244a25a9cdb950e0dae89 Log message: 6366222 zdb(1M) needs to use largefile primitives when reading label 6366267 zfs broke non-BUILD64 compilation of libsec Files: update: usr/src/cmd/zdb/zdb.c update: usr/src/lib/libsec/Makefile

Hey all, For those of you who are really worried about asterisk performance, I thought I might alert you to a "toy" you might play around with. The Intel Performance Primitives contain a number of optimized functions for use in digital signal processing that could help with echo cancellation, codec transformations, etc. I don't have any idea how useful this would be in Real

I just upgraded to the latest (as of a week ago) CVS and since them, I've had a problem with astcc. I've traced the problem as far as astcc calling any of the AGI "say..." routines (say_digits, say_number, etc.). As near as I can tell, the calls are executed, but control never returns to the astcc code that made the call, and as a result, the channel simply hangs (i.e., nothing

Not sure if primitives is the right word, but look at this: > help(for) Error: syntax error > ?for + [hit ctrl-c to get out at this pt] Either way I try I can't get help on for. Can the help mechanism be modified so it is possible to get help on these guys? Another example: > help(if) Error: syntax error But ?(ifelse) works. I am using version .62, release from April or so.

On SVN revision 41087: ?args has this example line: args(c) # -> NULL (c is a 'primitive' function) The comment seems out of date, as args(c) does in fact have a non-NULL return value: args(c) # function (..., recursive = FALSE) # NULL While at it, I was wondering, why formals(c) still returns NULL, in contrast. Regards Thomas Friedrichsmeier -------------- next

Hi, In the latest R this does not work anymore args <- formals(log) because log is primitive. Is there any other way to get the argument list? I just need the name of the parameter to display some error message about it. I have looked at args() but I can't find anything to extract the argument names from it. Thanks, M. Manese

Recent changes to R-devel has altered the way arguments are matched in most primitives to be identical to the argument matching in interpreted functions. So if argument names are supplied they are checked, surplus arguments are errors, and it is possible to use (perverse) constructions like substitute(e=list(x=1), y ~ x). There are a few deliberate exceptions: functions like call switch .C

I'm not sure if this is a bug or expected behavior, but I don't see anything in the documentation that explains it, so I thought I'd mention it: ~ michaelweylandt$ R -q --vanilla library(compiler) enableJIT(3) `+` # Throws an error `+` # Throws a warning `+` # Prints the primitive as expected sessionInfo() R version 2.14.1 (2011-12-22) Platform: i386-apple-darwin9.8.0/i386

I'm not convinced that how to make :: faster is the right question. If you are finding foo::bar being called often enough to matter to your overall performance then to me the question is: why are you calling foo::bar more than once? Making :: a bit faster by making it a primitive will remove some overhead, but your are still left with a lot of work that shouldn't need to happen more than

I added that so I can look at the proposed fix and put it or something similar in bugzilla for review final review. Apologies for the oversight. ~G On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 3:40 PM Antoine Fabri <antoine.fabri at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear R-devel, > > utils::isS3stdGeneric tries to subset the body of the function it's fed, > primitives don't like that because they

Should it work on traced functions ? As it is now it doesn't. Best, Antoine Le jeu. 20 ao?t 2020 ? 09:58, Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik at wu.ac.at> a ?crit : > >>>>> Gabriel Becker writes: > > > I added that so I can look at the proposed fix and put it or something > > similar in bugzilla for review final review. > > > Apologies for the

Hello, is the following somehow possible with Mod() being a primitive: "Mod" <- function(x) UseMethod("Mod") "Mod.default" <- function(x) { .Primitive("Mod") ### I know it?s wrong. How can I access the original Mod ? } Thanks for help M. Eger -- +------------------------------------------------------- | Marcus Eger | Philipps Universitaet

Hi all, I have a patch that fixes this and also fixes/improves debugcall so that it supports pkg::fun(obj) and pkg:::fun(obj) style calls. I'm going to test it a bit more and add a regression test for isS3stdGeneric and then I will submit it to bugzilla tonight or tomorrow morning. Best, ~G On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 5:28 PM Gabriel Becker <gabembecker at gmail.com> wrote: > Trace

On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Michael Lawrence wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:44 AM, <luke-tierney at uiowa.edu> wrote: >> >> For default methods there ought to be a way to create those so the >> default method is computed at creation or load time and stored in an >> environment. > > We had considered that, but we thought the definition of the function >

Hi all, I use Luke's "::" hoisting trick often. I think it would be fantastic if the JIT just did that for you. The main trouble, for me, is in code I don't own. When common Bioconductor packages are loaded many, many base functions are saddled with this substantial dispatch and "::" overhead. While we have the hood up, the parser could help out a bit here too. It

Dear R Gurus: How do I find the functions which are primitives, please? Thanks, Edna Bell

Dear R-devel, utils::isS3stdGeneric tries to subset the body of the function it's fed, primitives don't like that because they don't have a body, identity doesn't like it either because it's body is a symbol. According to the doc, any function is a legal input. See below: identity #> function (x) #> x #> <bytecode: 0x0000000013d6da28> #> <environment: