similar to: proc mixed vs. lme

Dear Experts, May be the problem is still solved, however I tried to find the answer in the archives: I use: > R.version _ platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 os mingw32 system i386, mingw32 status major 1 minor 7.1 year 2003 month 06 day 16

Dear all, I'm working with Cox-regression, because data could be censored. But in this particular case not. Now I have a simple example: PRO and PRE are (0,1) coded. The response is not normal distributed. We are interested in a model which could describe interaction. But my results are depending strongly in the choose of the contrast option. It is clear that there is some dependence in

Hi, I'm using: platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 os mingw32 system i386, mingw32 status major 1 minor 5.1 year 2002 month 06 day 17 language R and I would like to apply: > update.packages() trying URL

Summary: proc mixed vs. lme The objective of this summary is to help people to get more familiar with the specification of random effects with proc mixed or lme. Very useful are the examples of Ramon Littell's book: "SAS System for Mixed Models (1996)" (http://ftp.sas.com/samples/A55235) The same data set's are kindly made available by Douglas Bates in the

Dear R-helpers, First of all I have nothing against the French language! But now my problem, yesterday I installed R 2.1.1 and I had to experience that my RGui is speaking French. My windows locals is French (Switzerland). I'm used to English and I want to reset my RGui to English. I was seeking for the solution in the archives, however not successfully. By the way the searchable archives

Hello, I'm using: platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 os mingw32 system i386, mingw32 status major 1 minor 8.1 year 2003 month 11 day 21 language R and I get the following error with: library(Design) df <- list(pre=c(0,, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,

Dear all, I have a question about linear models. Is there something comparable to the estimate statement in SAS? E.g. proc mixed data=test; class x1 x2; model y=x1|x2 /s; estimate 'x1' x1 -1 1 x1*x2 -0.5 -0.5 0.5 0.5; estimate 'x2' x2 -1 1 x1*x2 -0.5 0.5 -0.5 0.5; run; Thanks for the help, Dominik Dominik Grathwohl Biostatistician Nestl? Research

Hello, ? I believe that in R, it is not possible to analyze mixed effect-models when the distribucion is not gaussian (p.e. binomial or poisson), isn't? ? Somebody can suggest me alternative? ? thanks ? xavi ? -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info",

Dear r-helpers, I have a question about multiple testing. Here an example that puzzles me: All matrixes and contrast vectors are presented in treatment contrasts. 1. example: library(multcomp) n<-60; sigma<-20 # n = sample size per group # sigma standard deviation of the residuals cov1 <- matrix(c(3/4,-1/2,-1/2,-1/2,1,0,-1/2,0,1), nrow = 3, ncol=3, byrow=TRUE, dimnames =

Dear Prof. Ripley, you mention the theory of perceptrons. Could you please point me to an introduction paper or book? Thanks in previous, Dominik > -----Original Message----- > From: ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk [mailto:ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk] > Sent: dimanche, 10. novembre 2002 18:55 > To: Ben Liblit > Cc: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch > Subject: Re: [R] building a formula for

Dear R-helpers: My question is how do I efficient and valid correct for multiple tests in a repeated measurement design: Suppose we measure at two distinct visits with repeated subjects a treatment difference on the same variable. The treatment differences are assessed with a mixed model and adjusted by two methods for multiple tests: # 1. Method: Adjustment with library(multcomp)

This should be very easy, but alas, I'm very new to R. My end goal is to calculate p-values from arima(). Let's say I just ran this: > MyModel <- arima(y[1:58], order=c(1,0,0), xreg=MyData[1:58,7:14], > method="ML") > MyModel And I see: arima(x = y[1:58], order = c(1, 0, 0), xreg = MyData[1:58, 7:14], method = "ML") Coefficients: ar1

Hello R-help subscribers, I am analyzing a data set using a mixed logit model, and I have recently discovered some curious behavior. I am hoping you all can help. I first ran the following model in December 2012. lmer(Response.binary ~ ItemType.c * Block + (1 | Subject) + (1 | Word), data=lexdec, family="binomial") I then took a break from the data for the holidays. I returned to

Hello, I have a problem finding a root of a function, which I define like this: tuki <- function(u, x, a, lambda){ if((lambda%%1>0) & u<0) {u<-(u+0i)} f <- Re(x-(a*(u)^lambda-(1-(u))^lambda)/lambda) f } What I want to do is to find the root, but without specifying the interval within which to search for it. I can do it easily in MATLAB with fsolve() or fzero() functions. I

Until a weeks ago I used stata for everything. Now I'm learning R and trying to move. But, in this stage I'm testing R trying to do the same things than I used to do in stata whit the same outputs. I have a problem with the logit, applying weights. in stata I have this output . svy: logit bach job2 mujer i.egp4 programa delay mdeo i.str evprivate (running logit on estimation sample)

Hi everyone, I have a quick and probably easy question about lme for this list. Say, for instance you want to model growth in pituitary distance as a function of age in the Orthodont dataset. fm1 = lme(distance ~ I(age-8), random = ~ 1 + I(age-8) | Subject, data = Orthodont) You notice that there is substantial variability in the intercepts (initial distance) for people at 8 years, and that

consider p as random effect with 5 levels, what is difference between these two models? > p5.random.p <- lmer(Y ~p+(1|p),data=p5,family=binomial,control=list(usePQL=FALSE,msV=1)) > p5.random.p1 <- lmer(Y ~1+(1|p),data=p5,family=binomial,control=list(usePQL=FALSE,msV=1)) in addtion, I try these two models, it seems they are same. what is the difference between these two model. Is

Hi r users,   I would like sort of   cdf         seq   rand 0.00E+00    0     0.262123478 1.56E-03    20    0.964293344 1.55E-02    40    0.494827113 5.30E-02    60    0.733726005 1.16E-01    80    0.800408948 1.97E-01    100   0.925748466 2.88E-01    120   0.047578356 3.80E-01    140   0.266060366 4.68E-01    160   0.125522629 5.48E-01    180   0.701193274 6.18E-01    200   0.915799432

Dear R guru, I am Saikat Sarkar working as a researcher of Economics in Tampere University, Finland. I am trying to estimate some Garch related tests with Bayesian analysis by R programme. I am not good in R but trying to survive. Anyway I have the coding but not working properly. I have tried to find the problem but failed. I am writing to all R gurus to help me out. Could you please look at

Hello, I have attached a model file which can be used to rank new queries. Disclaimer: I don't remember if its is the updated one or the one with which I evaluated the API before. But it should work with your new queries with libsvm based letor module. Parth. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: