similar to: rational approximations to the normal cdf

> Almost any method of fitting a density estimate would work on > integrating (numerically) the result. it is a nice idea concerning the monotony property, which will be obtained automatically, but I am going to use results of approximation analytically > In particular, look at package polspline, where > p(old)logspline does the integration for you. thank you, I am going to

Hi all, is there any package in R capable of smooth approximation of CDF basing on given sample? (Thus, I am not speaking about ecdf) In particular, I expect very much that the approximation should subject to the property: f(x0)<=f(x1) for x0<x1, where x0 and x1 belong to range of the sample given. Polynomial approximation could be OK for me as well. P.S.

Hi There, Users in some european countries like to write 1.234,56 instead of 1,234.56 What would be the easiest way of accepting this number format? For output, I''m using a formatting helper, but I haven''t figured out how to do it for input. thanks, js

Hi, Where can i find a stable version of clearcase plugin for radrails? Regards, Jatinder -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060623/0ca95234/attachment.html

Is there anyone out there successfully using Rational Clearcase with SAMBA? Was there any special changes you had to make to get it to work? We were told by Rational specifically not to use SAMBA and wanted to get the other side. TIA Paul Gilles Navigation Technologies -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms-tnef

Hello Samba, We tried to use samba-2.2.4-1 with Rational ClearCase and had a problem using WinBind. ClearCase requires the primary group id to be set to the clearcase users group. WinBind sets the primary group to something like DOMAIN_GROUP_RID_USERS. I am including the patch we made to samba-2.2.4 to get things working. I have added two new smb.conf options: winbind primary group //

Rational functions (ratios of polynomials) often provide good approximations to many functions. Does anyone know of any literature on nonlinear modeling with rational functions, sequential estimation, diagnostics, etc.? I know I can do it with "nls" and other nonlinear regression functions, but I'm wondering what literature might exist discussing how a search for an

Are there implementations of, e.g. Neville's algorithm, for interpolating polynomials through some data points? Nevilles' is an improvement on Lagrange interpolation. And how about interpolating rational functions? I could not find anything at rseek.org or at crantastic.org. thanks -- View this message in context:

Hi - I'm getting timouts trying to access us1.samba.org or I'd look through the archives first. Anyone currently supporting any versions of Rational's ClearCase/samba/UNIX/NT? We are currently running samba v2.0.3 on both HP-UX 11.0 (vob server) and Solaris 2.5.1 (view server). Rational ClearCase v3.2.1 on the two UNIX and NT Workstation 4 (some SP3, some SP4) We currently support

Hello, useRs. I was monitoring the recent thread about the numerical (in)accuracy of the C pow function and the apparent mismatch between R and matlab. That particular problem has been addressed, but it seems there are many others awaiting. I'm wondering if there is advice for package writers & prospective R contributors about avoiding the most common sorts of numerical mistakes. Has

Hi there, How accurate is the aproximation R makes to the Chi-Square distribution? For example, if I run: > qchisq(1/1000000,6) [1] 0.03650857 how accurate is 0.0365 compared to the theoretical percentile? What kind of approximations have been made in the software's algorithm? It woudl be useful to know since I am working with tiny percentiles such as one one-millionth and one

Hello, Please run the following code snippet and note the resulting plot: x <- c(10, 50) y <- c(0.9444483, 0.7680123) plot(x,y,type="b",log="x") for(i in 1:50){ xx <- exp(runif(1,log(min(x)),log(max(x)) )) yy <- approx(x,y,xout=xx, method = "linear") points(xx,yy$y) } notice the "log=x" plot parameter and the resulting "bow" in the

Andrew, Thank you for your suggestions. The real problem is Rational Technical support. When you pay someone 100k+ they tend to look for any excuse to deem you "unsupported". If you don't have your default group set to the clearcase user group, then technical support will decide that thats where your problem is! I am sure you know how that goes... I have solved problems

Hi all, I came across some curious behavior today in using hist.Date() and subsequently noted the same behavior in cut.Date(), both of which are using similar code when 'breaks = "months"' or 'breaks = "years"'. I was in the process of creating a histogram of subject enrollment in a clinical trial. The counts needed to be by month, so essentially used:

Dear Rich, I think that it's generally a bad idea to give statistical (as opposed to simply technical) advice by email without knowing the context of the research. I think that you'd do well to seek help from a statistician, and not just do what I suggest below. Interpolating the data only makes sense if there's no random component to the response (mag in your data). Otherwise, it

Gerald, No worries. This patch is required if your using Rational ClearCase and you don't want everyone to have access to it. It's to fix a brokenness (IMO) within ClearCase, and maybe other programs. Our windows primary group has 10k+ users... I will shoot it off to Rational, so they can provide it to there customers. I was hoping it could be applied to the main tree so I could just

Hi Rich, If I understand your comment about "uniformly distributed along the log=x axis" then I think John's (second) set of commands needs a change to the definition of xx, as follows: xx <- exp(seq(from=log(min(x)),to=log(max(x)),length=50)) m <- lm(y ~ log(x)) yy <- predict(m, data.frame(x=xx)) points(xx, yy, col="red") HTH, Eric On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at

Hello, I am Shashidhar SR Working for Siemens Communication Software in Bangalore, INDIA as a Configuration Manager for Clearcase. I need some help regarding the samba configuration at our site. First Let me Explain our Environment: - We are Using samba 2.2.8a on Solaris 9. - We are using samba as an interop from Solaris 9 box to winnt/w2k/win-xp clients. - On Solaris we have installed IBM

Hello, We are using Samba to connect our ClearCase server to the Windows environment. Our original configuration was one server hosting all our VOBs and Views. We have Samba configured to allow mapping of shares to our ClearCase Windows Clients. Everything was working fine. Now we have set up a second server to host all our Views separate from the VOBs. So we have a View server and a separate VOB

Dear list, I was attracted to a comment that the cdf.compare in S+ is not available in R. I wonder if anyone have more information on this. Thank you. Ilham