similar to: The unary - operator and matrix column labels

hi, folks: i need to transpose the following data: gene tissue patient1 patient2 patient3..... --------------------------------------------- gene1 breast 10 100 1 gene2 breast 20 200 4 gene3 breast 30 50 5 gene4 breast 40 400 9 ................................ to the

hi, everyone: i have a question on the reshape function. i have the following dataset : gene tissue patient1 patient2 patient3............. _________________________________________________ gene1 breast 10 20 50 gene2 breast 20 40 60 gene3 breast 100 200 300 which i hope to convert to the following format: gene patientID

I have data set up like the following: control1 <- sample(1:75, 3947398, replace=TRUE) control2 <- sample(1:75, 28793, replace=TRUE) control3 <- sample(1:100, 392733, replace=TRUE) control4 <- sample(1:75, 858383, replace=TRUE) patient1 <- sample(1:100, 28048, replace=TRUE) patient2 <- sample(1:50, 80400, replace=TRUE) patient3 <- sample(1:100, 48239, replace=TRUE) control

Hello, I have a problem with data reshaping. Here's my data DF <- structure(list(idvar1 = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L), .Label = c("patient1", "patient2" ), class = "factor"), idvar2 = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L), .Label = c("dob", "hog"), class =

Hello All, I have posted to this list before regarding the same issue so I apologize for the multiple e-mails. I am still struggling with this issue so I thought I'd give it another try. This time I have included reproducible code and a subset of the data I am analyzing. I am running an ANOVA with three factors: GROUP (5 levels), FEATURE (2 levels), and PATIENT (2 levels), where

Dear list, I have been struggling with this for some time now, and for the last hour I have been struggling to make a working example for the list. I hope someone out there have some experience with plotting longitudinal data that they will share. My data is some patient data with three different time stamps. First the patients are identified at different times (first time stamp). Second, they

Hello everyone, I am running a mixed effects model where I have two fixed factors, one with 2 levels and one with 4, and their interaction. Let's say these are my factors and their levels: FirstFactor: 1, 2 SecondFactor: A, B, C, D For the interaction, I am interested in the four two-way comparisons, not the two four-way comparisons. In other words, I want to test whether 1A is

Dear all, I have following data called "paitent" day patient1 patient4 patient5 patient6 0 -0.27842688 -0.04080808 -0.41948398 -0.04508318 56 -0.22275425 -0.01767067 -0.30977249 -0.03168185 112 -0.08217659 -0.26209243 -0.29141451 -0.09876170 252 0.08044537 -0.26701769 0.05727087 -0.09663701 where each patient have response values at four time points. I want to

Dear All, I have two factors: GROUP and PATIENT, where PATIENT is nested within GROUP. >levels(example$GROUP) [1] "0" "1" "2" "3" "4" > levels(example$PATIENT) [1] "1" "2" "3" There are three observations at each combination of these factors. However, there are no observations for PATIENT = 3 and GROUP

I'm new to this site so I hope this isn't too naive a problem. I'm trying to use the permax function with a data frame containing gene expression measurements taken from 79 microarray experiments with >3000 genes per array. The data contains missing values and every time I use permax with the data frame I get the error: NA/NaN/Inf in foreign function call (arg 1) Could anyone

Hi llvmdev, I've noticed that there is no unary operator in LLVM. For unary operator such as Neg or Or operator, the IR builder just creates a binary operation with one dummy operand, 01823 <http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1BinaryOperator.html#a073c092ce74a122e898e435e60e84599> BinaryOperator <http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1BinaryOperator.html>

Hi all, Why not make the unary minus operator return the factor with levels reversed? This would make it much easier to sort factors in descending order in part of an order statement. Hadley -- http://had.co.nz/

Hi guys I have been using R for a few months now and have come across an error that I have been trying to fix for a week or so now.I am trying to build a classifer that will classify the wine dataset using Naive Bayes. My code is as follows library (e1071) wine<- read.csv("C:\\Rproject\\Wine\\wine.csv") split<-sample(nrow(wine), floor(nrow(wine) * 0.5)) wine_training <-

Anyone seeing this? /etc/cron.daily/rkhunter: /usr/bin/rkhunter: regel 13967: [: eenzijdige operator werd verwacht, -ne gevonden Translating: line 13967 unary operator expected -ne found Line 13967 is: if [ `${IPCS_CMD} -u 2>/dev/null | awk -F' ' '/segments allocated/ {print $3}'` -ne 0 ]; then rkhunter 1.4.2 release 1.el6 from epel on a CentOS 6.5 Thanks Patrick

Hi R - listers, I am receiving an error. Does anyone know what this means? J ggplot(subset(foo, Rayos != "Rayos.NA"), aes(x=HTL, y=DevelopIndex, colour=TotalEggs)) +geom_point() +geom_jitter() + facet_grid(Aeventexhumed ~ Rayos) + geom_smooth(method="lm", fill=NA) + ylim(c(0, 7)) Error in +geom_smooth(method = "lm", fill = NA) : invalid argument to unary

Hello: I am using R 1.9.1 under windows. I am interested in the permax package for analyzing DNA microarray data. I see, from install.packages(), that the windows binary version is 1.2.1, but that source code exists for version 2.2. Version 2.2 has much more functionality, especially for clustered data. So, I wonder whether anyone has made a binary windows release for version 2.2 of this

I need to calculate a large number of t statistics, and would like to do so via matrix operations. So far I have figured out a way to calculate the mean of each row of the matrix: d <- matrix(runif(100000,1,10), 1000, 10) # some test data s <- rep(1,ncol(d)) # a sum vector to use for matrix multiplication means <- (d%*%s)/ncol(d) This is at least 1 order of magnitude faster than

hi - in version 2.1 the command >-2^2 gives -4 as the answer. (-2)^2 is evaluated correctly. Cheers, George Casella -- George Casella Phone: (352) 392-1941 Ext. 204 Distinguished Professor and Chair Cell: (352) 682-7210 Department of Statistics Fax: (352) 392-5175 University of Florida Email: casella at stat.ufl.edu P.O. Box 118545 Gainesville, FL

hi - in version 2.1 the command >-2^2 gives -4 as the answer. (-2)^2 is evaluated correctly. Cheers, George Casella -- George Casella Phone: (352) 392-1941 Ext. 204 Distinguished Professor and Chair Cell: (352) 682-7210 Department of Statistics Fax: (352) 392-5175 University of Florida Email: casella at stat.ufl.edu P.O. Box 118545 Gainesville, FL

>>>>> Jim Hester <james.f.hester at gmail.com> >>>>> on Thu, 16 Mar 2017 12:31:56 -0400 writes: > Gabe, > The unary functions have the same precedence as normal SPECIALS > (although the new unary forms take precedence over binary SPECIALS). > So they are lower precedence than unary + and -. Yes, both of your > examples are