similar to: Nonlinear Seemingly Unrelated Regression

TO: r-help at lists.R-project.org r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch Hello to everyone, I found some problems using R in the estimation of systems of nonlinear equations like SURE (Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equations) with mutual parameters as the following system example: EQ1 PQ1=P1*G1+B1*(Y-P1*G1-P2*G2-P3*G3) EQ2 PQ2=P2*G2+B2*(Y-P1*G1-P2*G2-P3*G3) where G1,G2,G3,B1,B2 are the

Hi everybody, I'm a newbye with lots of problems :). I'm trying to use nlsystemfit, but I recieve two error messages whose origin that I don't understand. 1) When I try to reproduce the example reported in the systemfit package manual, that is library( systemfit ) data( ppine ) hg.formula <- hg ~ exp( h0 + h1*log(tht) + h2*tht^2 + h3*elev + h4*cr) dg.formula <- dg ~ exp( d0

Hi  I want to fit two equations simultaneously EQ1<-Y1~X1+X2 EQ2<-Y2~X1+X2 eqsystem<-list(Y1HAT=EQ1,Y2HAT=EQ2) fitols<-systemfit(eqsystem, method="OLS", data=BB) How do I get coefficients for the first equation? R code How do I restrict coefficient of X2 in the first equation (say , restrict it to less than  zero). R code Your help is appreciated. Dereje [[alternative

Dear List Members,I am trying to set up a large system of equations and I am trying to find a simple way to set up the list command under the package system fit. Here is the example from system fit and what I am trying to do: EQ1 <- Y1 ~ X1 + X2 + X4EQ2 <- Y2 ~ X2 + X3EQ3 <- Y3 ~ X2 + X3 + X4EQ4 <- Y4 ~ X1 + X3 + X4eqSystem <-list(form1 = EQ1, form2 = EQ2, form3 = EQ3, form4 = EQ4)

Greetings R Users, I have a system of equations for which I would like to output all the R-squares. Assume there are four equations in my system, the only way I found to output all the R-squares is by calling them out one by one as this: summary(fitSUR$eq[[1]])$r.squared summary(fitSUR$eq[[2]])$r.squared summary(fitSUR$eq[[3]])$r.squared summary(fitSUR$eq[[4]])$r.squared But isn't there a

Is there a way to apply paste to?list(form1 = EQ1, form2 = EQ2, form3 = EQ3, form4 = EQ4)?such that I don't have to write form1=EQ1 for all my models?(I might have a list of 20 or more)? I also need the EQs to read the formulas associated with them. For example, below, I was able to automate the name assignment but I could not figure out how to?to set up the list using?paste or other

Dear list members, Is there a package somewhere for jointly estimating two poisson processes? I think the closest I've come is using the "SUR" option in the Zelig package (see below), but when I try the "poisson" option instead of the "SUR" optioin I get an error (error given below, and indeed, reading the documentation of the Zelig package, I get the impression

Hello all, I am relatively new to R, but enjoying it very much. I am hoping that someone on this list can help me with an issue I am having. I am having issues with iterations over nleqslv, in that the solver does not appear to clean up memory used in previous iterations. I believe I've isolated the/my issue in a small sample of code: library(nleqslv) cons_ext_test <- function(x){

Hello to everyone, I have 2 problems and would be very pleased if anyone can help me: 1) When I use the package "systemfit" for SUR regressions, I get two different variance-covariance matrices when I firstly do the SUR regression ("The covariance matrix of the residuals used for estimation") and secondly do the OLS regressions. In the manual for "systemfit" on page

I'm getting this error on the attached code and breaking my head but can't figure it out. Any help is much appreciated. Thanks, Vince CODE: library(deSolve) Res_DAE=function(t, y, dy, pars) { with(as.list(c(y, dy, pars)), { res1 = -dS -dES-k2*ES res2 = -dP + k2*ES eq1 = Eo-E -ES eq2 = So-S -ES -P return(list(c(res1, res2, eq1, eq2))) }) } pars <- c(Eo=0.02,

Vince, When that happens, one possible reason is that your DAE is of index > 1, which cannot be solved by daspk. The solver radau, also from deSolve can handle DAEs up to index 3, but you need to rewrite the problem in the form M*y' = f(x,y), where M is a mass matrix. If you do that for your problem, and solve it with radau, then radau complains that the "matrix is repeatedly

I am having problem using output of lm() function for further analysing using systemfit package. Basicaly, the problem s following - I generate several formulas using lm() > fo1 <- lm(r98[,2] ~ f98[,1] + f98[,2] + ... + f98[,43]) > fo2 <- lm(r98[,1] ~ f98[,1] + f98[,2] + ... + f98[,43]) and than I want to estimate a general model using package systemfit. > fitsur <-

Hey, I want to implement a structural model with the package systemfit with some linear and nonlinear constraints. How to implement linear restrictions is clear. Does anybody know how to set up nonlinear restrictions in the systemfit packages. For example: beta1 = beta2-(beta4/beta6) I look forward to your reply -- View this message in context:

Hello, I want to solve a nonlinear 3SLS problem with "nlsystemfit()". The equations are of the form y_it = f_i(x,t,theta) The functions f_i(.) have to be formulated as R-functions. When invoking "nlsystemfit()" I get the error Error in deriv.formula(eqns[[i]], names(parmnames)) : Function 'f1' is not in the derivatives table

http://Atlantica-gold.virdeal.com http://Globs-of-Ectoplasm.virdeal.com http://darkfall-gold.virdeal.com http://www.virdeal.com http://www.ahwowgold.com http://www.igepoch.com http://ffxi-gil.virdeal.com/ http://www.lotro-gold-money.com http://wow-gold.virdeal.com http://runescape-gold.virdeal.com/ http://maplestory-mesos.virdeal.com http://www.mesos-maplestory.net http://flyff-penya.virdeal.com

Dear R users, the systemfit package contains functions for fitting systems of simultaneous equations by various estimation methods (e.g. OLS, SUR, 2SLS, 3SLS). Currently version 0.8 of systemfit is available on CRAN. However, shortly we will upload version 1.0, which is NOT BACKWARD COMPATIBLE. The changes that broke backward compatibility were necessary to make systemfit() more similar to

Dear R users, the systemfit package contains functions for fitting systems of simultaneous equations by various estimation methods (e.g. OLS, SUR, 2SLS, 3SLS). Currently version 0.8 of systemfit is available on CRAN. However, shortly we will upload version 1.0, which is NOT BACKWARD COMPATIBLE. The changes that broke backward compatibility were necessary to make systemfit() more similar to

Hello. I am still a newbie in R. Excuse me if I am asking something obvious. My efforts to get an answer through browsing the mailing archives failed. I want to perform an augmented Dickey-Fuller test and to obtain AIC and BIC and to be able to impose some linear restrictions on the ADF regression so as to decide the correct order of autoregression. However I could find no obvious way to impose

Hi all - I'm on R 2.5.1 for XP. in the systemfit package, the summary is set to print the McElroy's measure of fit unless it's NULL. When the option saveMemory = TRUE, the McElroy isn't included, instead it defaults to NA. Thus I am unable to use summary.systemfit. > library(systemfit) > example(systemfit) > surfit2 <-

the games i'm dealing with are eq and eq2. both the same error so i'm thinking its a wine issue and not a game specific issue i'll list my error here as best possible, and note that i have found "fixes" to this problem but have no idea what anyone in those "fix" threads are talking about. just search my error #, on this site or google and you'll get a result.