similar to: modified kolmogorov-smirnov

Today I upgraded my Debian testing server (just personal testing server), and one of the updates was dovecot-common and dovecote-imapd. I passed through the dovecot.conf file changing things so that I would have similar features as before, and everything looked OK. Now, after restarting, and all, I try to connect the the imap server with my user acount, and it passes OK, but when I try to see

I just migrated my FC4 server to CentOS 5 and had some problems with DB connections from PHP to a PG server (remote server). The thing is that I couldn't get an error, until I disabled SELinux. At that time, the PG connections started working. Are there any instructions on how to work with SELinux enabled and multiple applications connecting one with another? -- select

I was thinking the last few days, wouldn't it be better to divide the centos-announce list by the archs, so that if I'm interested in the i386 arch, I only get those, and not the ia64, or the s390. Just a thought. -- 21:50:04 up 2 days, 9:07, 0 users, load average: 0.92, 0.37, 0.18 --------------------------------------------------------- Lic. Mart?n Marqu?s | SELECT

Will there be any betas of centos 5? Or should we test the RHEL5 betas? -- 21:50:04 up 2 days, 9:07, 0 users, load average: 0.92, 0.37, 0.18 --------------------------------------------------------- Lic. Mart?n Marqu?s | SELECT 'mmarques' || Centro de Telem?tica | '@' || 'unl.edu.ar'; Universidad Nacional | DBA, Programador, del

The Centos 5 install on my notebook stopped at 51% complete on downloading packages. Is there anyway to restart where it hung? Say boot into linux resumeinstall ? :) ARGH!!!

Ok just curious how many hits the http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/5/isos/ URL was getting? lol I think I check at least 4-5 times a day and all of a sudden instead of forbidden error I got in!!! ... only to find the tail end of some of the powers' humor: "5 hasnt been released" LOL I just about fell over -- L -- "To mess up a Linux box, you need to work at it; to mess

Hello, Cent-OS 5 is final release? What about DVD iso's? Why the images are not compressed? -- -- Publicidad http://www.pas-world.com

I am using php 5.1.6 and mysql 5.0 on 4.3 centos on running phpinfo mysql is shown as not supported how can I enable mysql support on php 5 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070313/68c83440/attachment.html>

How will CentOS 5 compare to RHEL 5 Advanced Platform? Re: Which version of RHEL will CentOS 5 compare to most directly? Thank you, Jeff _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web!

Is it possible to run php4 and php5 parallel in Centos4 somehow? If the parallel php5 could be installed from rpm also that would be great also. Regards, Peter

Hi! In the release notes it is said RHDS will replace OpenLDAP. However, I can only find OpenLDAP in CentOS5. I tried to google the web but it returned nothing useful. Does anyone know about this? Thanks. Regards, Wei Yu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070528/822fe713/attachment.html>

Yesterday, I upgraded my debian packages from 0.99.14 to 0.99.20050712-2. IMAP service has not been reliable since, and I was seeing crashes with one user. I tried deleting the user's .subscriptions and .imap folders, and forcing the client (Mac OS X's Mail.app) to redownload everything, but that resulted in an empty inbox. Here's what I have: # dpkg -l dovecot*

Hi, Running Centos 5 (32bit)... running a server with 4gb of RAM and it's shows up as: [root at ubercore1 ~]# free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 3369544 2549668 819876 0 29008 2382360 -/+ buffers/cache: 138300 3231244 Swap: 6291448 0 6291448 I know 4gb is the limit for a 32bit OS but i

The CentOS development team is pleased to announce the release of CentOS 5 (Beta) for i386 and x86_64. It is available via beta.CentOS.org mirrors and bittorrent. This release corresponds to the upstream vendor EL5 beta2 release. NOTE: This software is BETA and should be treated as such. It is for testing purposes only. Please ensure it meets your needs completely before using in a production

The CentOS development team is pleased to announce the release of CentOS 5 (Beta) for i386 and x86_64. It is available via beta.CentOS.org mirrors and bittorrent. This release corresponds to the upstream vendor EL5 beta2 release. NOTE: This software is BETA and should be treated as such. It is for testing purposes only. Please ensure it meets your needs completely before using in a production

Is there a package for CentOS of GNU/Pascal? -- 21:50:04 up 2 days, 9:07, 0 users, load average: 0.92, 0.37, 0.18 --------------------------------------------------------- Lic. Mart?n Marqu?s | SELECT 'mmarques' || Centro de Telem?tica | '@' || 'unl.edu.ar'; Universidad Nacional | DBA, Programador, del Litoral |

What kind of strage dependenct does openoffice have that it needs tomcat5: [root at naboo ~]# yum remove tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api Loading "downloadonly" plugin Loading "priorities" plugin Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Remove Process Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. --->

Hi - A little while ago I posted a question about the implementation of a two-dimensional analog of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test in R[1][2]. As there isn't one, as far as I know, people might be interested in a very fast C++ implementation called MUAC which is available as a function and as a standalone program from http://www.acooke.org/jara/muac/index.html. Apparently the code is

I've fixed this by adding 0.5/mn to q. The problem (at least in principle) with multiplying them all up is integer overflow. By the time 0.5/mn underflows to zero, missing one value in the distribution won't matter. -thomas On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, David John Allwright wrote: > Dear Thomas, Right, thank you. Yes, I haven't looked at the source code > (because I don't

Dear Thomas, Right, thank you. Yes, I haven't looked at the source code (because I don't know C) but something like what you mention could well cause the kind of problems I am seeing: a loop being exectued one too few or one too many times. And yes, I think those quantities should be multiplied up by m*n to all become integers so we escape rounding error problems. David.