similar to: Sessions and associations

Hi everyone. I''ve made a default change to has_many :through associations that I felt was important to make before they''re released. This is after some tickets and confusion I''ve seen regarding has_many :through. class Connection < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :user belongs_to :channel end class Channel < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :connections

Hi, I''ve been developing an application in Rails 1.0 and finally made the switch to Edge for has_many :through and polymorphism. I''m currently storing the authenticated user object (User model) in the session. This has worked well up until upgrading to EdgeRails. What I do is set @user = session[:user] in my controllers and then access the various @user associations such as

Hi, Last week my class conducted an experiment by putting out clay caterpillars to look at the effects of urbanization, color, and location on caterpillar predation. There were two sites (urban, rural), three colors (green, yellow, red) and two locations at each site (edge, interior). The entire data set is below. I've checked out the MASS book, Dalgaard's book, and the R-help archives

Hi, currently the eager association loading via ":include" does not work when a has-many or habtm association is combined with offset/limit (which is required for paginations). This is because in these cases, the result set will contain more than one row per object, but limit/offset works on row numbers. I''ve developed a patch that makes this work by using 2 SQL statements

This feels more like a question to ask the core list, forgive me if I trespass. I''ve been trying to help one of my cow orkers get through a sticky problem. He''s got a fairly complex nested form to update a model and its children. He''s started adding some validations, and we''ve encountered a number of issues: First he had a validation on one of the child

Now that Rails has gone on a diet and components have been moved out of core and into plugins, it seems that Classic Pagination should also be in the official Rails plugin repository. Currently, it''s at svn://errtheblog.com/svn/plugins/classic_pagination. It seems inconsistent that, unlike acts_as_list, acts_as_tree, etc., pagination should reside at a separate location. This

I''m looking for someone to confirm the following as a bug in Rails 1.0 before I post it to Trac. If I use eager loading on an association that has conditions defined, the conditions are ignored. The following example illustrates the problem. I have two tables: create_table "blogs", :force => true do |t| t.column "name", :string end create_table

Hi, I''m searching for a method of eager loading polymorphic associations under activerecord 2.0.2. After some initial google-fu I came up with a link to an enhancement that''s been added to edge: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8119 Anyone have any idea how long that might take to work its way into a general release? I''m early in development now so I can afford to

Hello all, I have an Order object that has and belongs to many Products and has and belongs to many Loan Types. This is so I can select multiples of each in my order entry screen via checkbox groups. I''m having some trouble with saving multiple HABTM associations for a single model object; only the first HABTM association declared in the model will save during the initial @order.save

Hi friends, i''m usgin the edge version because i need eager loading on polymorphic associations support, but i see this: Message.find(:first, :include => :owner) #This generate this query: SQL (0.000072) SET SQL_AUTO_IS_NULL=0 Message Load (0.000389) SELECT * FROM `messages` User Load (0.001070) SELECT * FROM `users` WHERE (users.id IN (1,2)) And this Message.find(:first,

I have an object that belongs_to :task, and calling that object''s task method returns the task it belongs to in the unit tests. One place in a controller, though, it gives me the error: undefined method `find'' for Rake::Task:Class ./script/../config/../vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/associations/belongs_to_association.rb:44:in `find_target''

I''d like to be able to use a has_many :through association and treat the associations as a list but I''m getting this error when I try an use an acts_as_list method: NoMethodError: undefined method `move_to_bottom'' I''m using edge rails r6786. Here are my domain rules: Activities are things students can do. Units consists of a sequenced list of

I''m using the user engine and therefore have a current_user User object on my sessions. User has a collection called ''properties'' and I am accessing the Property objects via the current_user session variable and also directly with Property.find. The problem I have is that rails seems to be caching the properties collection over requests (I can see the collection

If anybody on edge familiar with this could help, that would be "great" :) I have different types of things I want to be "reviewable". So, instead of having a slew of HABTM... this new Polymorphic Associations schtick seemed like the best solution. I have everything setup as I thought it should be (so I think)... but it doesn''t appear to be working correctly. Here

I''ve tested this on both 2.3 RC2 and Edge. This pastie contains model, helper and view: http://pastie.org/415742 When I save a vocabulary - its terms don''t save. I''m fairly sure it worked in RC1. Would appreciate any insight. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on

Hi, I''m very new to rspec, so if this is not the right forum please let me know. I''m starting to spec my models first in an existing rails app, porting from a mix of Test::Unit, and simply_bdd amongst others. I''m at the point where I want to test that certain associations are present. What I''m not sure of is should I test the association or the method and

I''m willing to write a patch for this issue: https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/8893 But want to confirm that the new behavior makes sense before I make the effort. Essentially if you have an unsaved parent and child, and the parent''s association to the child has an inverse_of declared on it. When the parent gets saved, it updates the foreign key on the child, and this

You'll get the why as well as the how-to in advanced systems and software at this renown conference for system administrators, developers, and researchers- 24th Annual USENIX TECHNICAL CONFERENCE June 6-11, 1999 Monterey, California Includes FREENIX track devoted to open source software ----------------------------------------------------------------- Review the program and register

Hi, I am trying to restrict duplicate has_and_belongs_to_many associations. I tried to find support for a association validation for duplicates but couldn''t find anything. I understand I could use :uniq=>true on the model association but this would only prevent it from displaying duplicates, I want to stop duplicate associations being inserted in the first place. I have a vague

I like the cookie sessions that Rails edge has - they make sense, they''re fast, easy. For those that don''t know: the default session mechanism is to give developers a Hash called session. To store this object between requests it Marshals the session object and sends the object itself (now as a bitstream) back to clients to store in their cookie file. To prevent users from