similar to: Benchmarks

Hi ! I wonder if the R application is capable of utilizing more than one CPU. I need to know since we run it on a SunFire 3800 with 8 750 USIII cpu:s and on a E420R with 4 USII cpu:s and we don't feel like we get the performance we could expect. I've seen some old discussions claiming that it isn't. With kind regards Lennart Araskoug

Hi All, We have been running samba-1.9.18p10 beautifully for the past year or so. Finally decided to upgrade to samba-2.0.6 and am having no luck. We are using security=server such that the users are using their NT login/password to authenticate. When I test the 2.0.6 installation with smbclient, I get the "protocol negotiation failure" message. Does anyone know what this means? I

I have been lurking in this list a while and searching in the archives to find out how one learns to write fast R code. One solution seems to be to write part of the code not in R but in C. However after finding a benchmark article (http://www.sciviews.org/other/benchmark.htm) I have been more interested in making the R code itself more efficient. I would like to find more info about this. I have

We are trying to compile and run the ttest.c example that comes with R (in C:\Program Files\R\rw1081\src\library\windlgs\src\ttest.c). After compiling it with MS Visual C++ we load the DLL with dyn.load. So far it seems good, but when we try to call it from R (after running C:\Program Files\R\rw1081\src\library\windlgs\R\windlgs.R) R crashes. We have tried changing the exports from DLL but have

Hi, I am writing C++ functions that are to be called via .Call() interface. I'd been using error() (from R.h) to return to R if there is an error, but then I realized that this might be not safe as supposedly error() doesn't throw an exception and therefore some destructors do not get called and some memory may leak. Here is a simple example extern "C" void foo() { string

Hi all, Five minutes ago I heard a rumor that Lennart Poettering has rewritten rsync. My top urgency is to download the latest numbered version of rsync untouched by Lennart Poettering: I'll find out if the rumor is true or false later. I've downloaded rsync rsync-3.1.3.tar.gz and rsync-patches-3.1.3.tar.gz from https://download.samba.org/pub/rsync/ . Is the source code in both those

Avi I fear this was all a huge social experiment. Testing if a post titled "sexy way" would increase engagement... On Sat, 28 Sep 2024, 07:21 , <avi.e.gross at gmail.com> wrote: > I see a book coming: > "666 ways to do the same thing in R ranked by sexiness." > > Kidding aside, if you look under the covers of some of the functions we > are

Hello, I am currently trying to connect my Dovecot mail server to Microsoft's Azure-AD and use it as password and user database. I am using version 2.3.7.1. Using the Azure-AD as passdb already works. In this context I noticed that the scope implementation is not yet merged. Since I haven't found any hints for an OAuth2 userdb implementation yet, I wanted to ask if there are any plans

I see a book coming: "666 ways to do the same thing in R ranked by sexiness." Kidding aside, if you look under the covers of some of the functions we are using, we may find we are taking steps back as some of them use others and perhaps more functionality than we need. But for a new reader , looking at many approaches may open up other ways and ideas and see the problem space as quite

I'm using configure. On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Lennart Augustsson <lennart at augustsson.net> writes: > >> Commenting out the Hello transformation I get these link errors: >> >> llvm[2]: Linking Debug Shared Library LTO.dll >>

Hi, Is there some documentation about what has not been implemented yet? I'm trying to use vectors and I just run into one thing after another that seem to be missing. (I.e., fcmp on vectors doesn't work; trying to do the same thing with expanded instructions doesn't work; select on a vector doesn't work) -- Lennart

Sorry to append, but I just realised that of course ``` x |> ? pmap(c) |> ? reduce(c) |> ? unname() ``` also works and is a general solution in case your list has more than three elements. Here, we map in parallel over all elements of the list, always combining the current set of elements into a vector, and then reduce the resulting list into a vector by combining the elements

On Jan 24, 2009, at 4:34 AM, Lennart Augustsson <lennart at augustsson.net> wrote: > Hi, > > Is there some documentation about what has not been implemented yet? I've started adding notes to docs/LangRef.html Historically this document has been used to describe just the LLVM IR, and not what specific consumers of it do or don't support, but codegen is a very

Commenting out the Hello transformation I get these link errors: llvm[2]: Linking Debug Shared Library LTO.dll c:/DOCUME~1/1312888/Desktop/Workspace/llvm/llvm-top/Debug/lib/libLLVMSystem.a(Signals.o): In function `Z28LLVMUnhandledExceptionFilterP19_EXCEPTION_POINTERS': c:/DOCUME~1/1312888/Desktop/Workspace/llvm/llvm-top/lib/System/Win32/Signals.inc:164: undefined reference to

Dear List I would like to ask you something concenting a better print of the R output: I have a bit data frame which has the following structure: CFISCALE RAGSOCB ANNO VAR1 VAR2......... 9853312 astra 2005 6 45 9853312 astra 2006 78 45

Any ideas what is the problem with this code? > N <- 2; c(Sys.Date(), sprintf('N = %d', N)) [1] "2012-01-10" NA Warning message: In as.POSIXlt.Date(x) : NAs introduced by coercion Best regards, Ryszard Ryszard Czerminski AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP 35 Gatehouse Drive Waltham, MA 02451 USA 781-839-4304 ryszard.czerminski@astrazeneca.com

Currently as the first column in a data frame I have string values in the format xx_yy - I want to create a new column with just the substring xx (for each row in turn). Three possible ways to do this might be (1) split the string by '_' using strsplit and paste the first of the resulting variables into a new column, but I have been unable to do this for each row of my data frame in turn

Is there any rational explanation for the bizarre seq() behavior below? > seq(2,8.1, lenght.out=3) [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > help(seq) > seq(2,8,length.out=3) [1] 2 5 8 > seq(2,8.1,length.out=3) [1] 2.00 5.05 8.10 Except maybe that it is early in the morning :) Best regards, Ryszard Ryszard Czerminski AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP 35 Gatehouse Drive Waltham, MA 02451 USA 781-839-4304

Any ideas what is wrong? > strsplit("a.b", ".") # generates empty strings with split="." [[1]] [1] "" "" "" > strsplit("a b", " ") # seems to work fine with split=" ", and other characters... [[1]] [1] "a" "b" > > R.Version() $platform [1]

I feel like I'm going totally crazy. Is it just me, or have embedded From_ lines really been breaking mbox messages since (at least) dovecot 1.0? I found a whole lot of broken messages in an old mailbox of mine and when I looked closer at it, it seemed like Dovecot was ignoring the Content-Length header and truncating the messages at the first embedded From_ line instead. Figuring