similar to: Problem with recommended files

Hello, This is my first post to the help request list, so I'm going to err on the side of giving too much information. I'm working on writing a simulation in which agents will make repeated production and exchange decisions with randomly chosen partners. The idea is, all agents can produce two goods which they want to consume, they choose a value t in [0,10] which sets their production

For my own needs I have created the .spec file needed for rpm packaging of the flac package. End users --------- If anyone is interested in the resulting rpm-files i have made them available on http://noa.tm/flac-rpms/ FLAC maintainers ---------------- I have attached the specfile along with hooks in Makefile.am and configure.in in unified diff format so that they are ready for inclusion in

Thanks much for the the reply! Some sec updates/bug fixes have been applied thru the run of 6u5 and after, but yes, still firmly in 6u5 land. Guess will have to test. Broadwell cpus do run in the OS, but "6u5" is stated as not supporting 26XXv4 chipsets. regards On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:56 PM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > On 6/15/2016 2:48 PM, jsl6uy

Full_Name: Uwe F. Mayer Version: 2.9.1 OS: SunOS myhost 5.10 Generic_120012-14 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris Submission from: (NULL) (216.113.168.130) Standard configuration (that is, not specifying --without-recommended-packages) leads to the following error: gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/opt/build/R-2.9.1/src/library' gmake[1]: Leaving directory

Hi, I am building 2.1.0 (re-release version, if that matters) on a Windows XP machine. Following the instructions 3.1 "Building from source" in R-admin.html, I managed to get up to 3.1.6. But when I try to build the recommended packages, I get C:\hiro\codes\proj\R-2.1.0\src\gnuwin32>make recommended --- Unpacking recommended packages ---- VR make[1]: *** No rule to make target

I'm not really sure this is the place to raise this, but here goes anyway. I've downloaded the 1.4.0 recommended package sources R-1.4.0-recommended.tgz multiple times from the main CRAN site. The sources have arrived corrupted each time (from multiple computers BTW). If I download the same file from the UCLA or University of Bristol mirror, I also get corrupt archive files. On the

Hi Paolo & Co, So I've been running into another bug with SeaBIOS w/ virtio-scsi + vhost-scsi-pci code.. During the last weeks debugging on the QEMU vhost memory re-mapping bug, my seabios builds have been using a smaller target ID (16) for scanning than the default hard coded value of 256 in init_virtio_scsi(). After bumping this value back to 256 recently, a bogus out_num value from

Hi Paolo & Co, So I've been running into another bug with SeaBIOS w/ virtio-scsi + vhost-scsi-pci code.. During the last weeks debugging on the QEMU vhost memory re-mapping bug, my seabios builds have been using a smaller target ID (16) for scanning than the default hard coded value of 256 in init_virtio_scsi(). After bumping this value back to 256 recently, a bogus out_num value from

On 06/15/2016 05:10 PM, jsl6uy js16uy wrote: > Thanks much for the the reply! > Some sec updates/bug fixes have been applied thru the run of 6u5 and after, > but yes, still firmly in 6u5 land. Guess will have to test. > Broadwell cpus do run in the OS, but "6u5" is stated as not supporting > 26XXv4 chipsets. > Theoretically, it should be possible to run the latest

For virtualization, we've developed virtio_ring for efficient communication. This would also work well for userspace-kernel communication, particularly for things like the tun device. By using the same ABI, we can join guests to the host kernel trivially. These patches are fairly alpha; I've seen some network stalls I have to track down and there are some fixmes. Comments welcome!

For virtualization, we've developed virtio_ring for efficient communication. This would also work well for userspace-kernel communication, particularly for things like the tun device. By using the same ABI, we can join guests to the host kernel trivially. These patches are fairly alpha; I've seen some network stalls I have to track down and there are some fixmes. Comments welcome!

Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and no support for VirtIO servers. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg server implementation, which makes it possible to use RPMsg over VirtIO between guest VMs and the host. Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski at linux.intel.com> ---

Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and no support for a VirtIO server. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg server implementation. Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski at linux.intel.com> --- drivers/vhost/Kconfig | 7 + drivers/vhost/Makefile | 3 +

Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and no support for a VirtIO server. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg server implementation. Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski at linux.intel.com> --- drivers/vhost/Kconfig | 7 + drivers/vhost/Makefile | 3 +

Hi, there I am a graduate student new to coding in S who is hitting a bit of a wall at present using an "optim" function. I am running into some troubles, and was hoping someone might be able to recognize where I am going wrong. As background: I have constructed a loop that carries out a 365-day calculation for a mass-balance model. Basically, the model depends on 2 variables (p,

Hi Mathieu, On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 04:01:38PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:13:51PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport > > protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and > > no support for VirtIO servers. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg > >

Hi Mathieu, On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 04:39:46PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > Good afternoon, > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 07:46:36PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport > > protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and > > no support for a VirtIO server. This patch adds a

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 05:09:27PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport > protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and > no support for a VirtIO server. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg > server implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski at

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 05:09:27PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport > protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and > no support for a VirtIO server. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg > server implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski at

Hi all, I wish to generate additional records according to one of the field values in a data frame. For example, unique record from the input data is required to be generated number of times as specified in the 'Number' field in the following code. > x <- data.frame(Name = c("a", "b", "c", "d"), Group = c("VR", "MR",