similar to: interpretation of lm

Hi, I am trying to plot an interaction.plot with different color for each level of a factor. It has an erratic behavior. For example, it works for the first interaction.plot below, with the example from the ALDA book, but not with the other plots, from the NPK dataset: # from http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/r/examples/alda/ch2.htm tolerance <-

Hi all, Perhaps this in an inappropriate post, but I've found a bug in proj I'd like to track down a bit further before making a formal bug report. The example below shows the problem, if you change the rownames proj fails. The problem seems to be that there is a mismatch in the rownames in the qr objects constructed by aov and the rownames that proj is expecting them to have.

Dear Madame, Dear Sir, I am able to obtain the coefficients from a 'summary' of 'lm', but NOT from a 'summary' of 'aov'. The following example shows my steps. ## Initialize rm(list = ls()) # remove (almost) everything in the working environment utils::data(npk, package="MASS") # get data model <- yield ~ block + N*P*K ## Using lm npk.lm <-

Hi, This might be a minor bug, or it could be that I'm just mis-using the tools (again). If you modify the example for model.tables to introduce an NA, N <- c(0,1,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,1,0,0) P <- c(1,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,1,1,0) K <- c(1,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,1,0) yield <-

I'm baffled. When I run make check after installing from source, I get a Error 2. From my understanding of how these things work, it would appear to be coming from this (as at the end of base-Ex.Rout.fail: > has.VR <- require(MASS, quietly = TRUE) Attaching package 'MASS': The following object(s) are masked from package:base : confint confint.lm nclass.FD nclass.scott

Dear listmembers, I would like to define a class with a slot that takes either an object of class aov or NULL. I have been reading "S4 Classes in 15 pages more or less" and "Lecture: S4 classes and methods" #First I tried with list and NULL setClass(listOrNULL") setIs("list", "listOrNULL") setIs("NULL", "listOrNULL") #doesn't

I would appreciate it if someone could explain the results of the example from the aov() help file. The output given below is different from book Venables and Ripley - MASS The results In R1.5.1 (Under windows) is as follows: > N <- c(0,1,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,1,0,0) > P <- c(1,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,1,1,0) > K <-

The following R commands were written: >help.search("factorial") >data(npk) >npk >coef(npk.aov) In the output of coef command, please explain me the interpretation of coefficients of block1 to block 6 in this 2^3 confounded factorial experiment. Thanks. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, I noticed that model.tables fails when applied to an aov() fit if called inside a function. The problem seems to occur when as.formula is used inside a function on a string containing "<formula> + Error( x / y )" The reason I tried to use as.formula is to generate dynamic calls to aov(). Here is a minimal example illustrating the problem: ## Example test <-

Hello all. I'm currently working with mixed models, and have noticed a curious difference between the nlme and lmer packages. While I realize that model selection with mixed models is a tricky issue, the two packages currently produce different AIC scores for the same model, but they systematically differ by 2. In looking at the logLik values for each method, I find that they

One of the changes some packages are noticing from the recent modifications to methods is warnings of "undefined classes" during installation when the package extends S3 classes or uses them as slots UNLESSS they have been declared in a setOldClass() call. The green book "strongly recommends" declaring S3 classs this way (pp 449-451). The warnings on undeclared classes

Hi all, I have been trying to reproduce an analysis from Douglas Montgomery?s book on design and analysis of experiments. Table 6.10 of example 6.2 on page 246, gives a table as follows: > NPK <- expand.grid(A=mp,B=mp,C=mp,D=mp) > Rate <- c(45,71,48,65,68,60,80,65,43,100,45,104,75,86,70,96) > filtration <- cbind(NPK,Rate) > filtration A B C D Rate 1 - - - - 45 2

Hi, can you advise me is there any ROC(Receiver Operating Characteristic)analysis program in R? Thanks, Dechao ===== Dechao Wang Tel: (44) 01223 719718 Mob: (44) 07729 411134 __________________________________________________ Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts

Whether the two variables have the same units does not matter. Moreover, even if there were some way of converting cm to kg the correlation would still be the same because the correlation is invariant under unit conversion as it is invariant under multiplication of its arguments by a constant. As for your second question, the correlation estimator is a continuous function of each of the

(R 0.65.0 and earlier): example(aov) lm.influence(npk.aov) gives Error: NA/NaN/Inf in foreign function call (arg 6) which comes from the lm.obj$coefficients (the last 3-way interaction coefficient is indetermined and accordingly NA) argument passed to .Fortran("lminfl",...) inside lm.influence. The following is a simple correct patch --- lm.influence.R 1999/08/13

Background: OS: Linux Mandrake 10.1 release: R 2.0.0 editor: GNU Emacs 21.3.2 front-end: ESS 5.2.3 --------------------------------- Colleagues I am having some trouble extracting results from the function by, used to average variables in a data.frame first by one factor (depth) and then by a second factor (station). The real data.frame is quite large > dim(data.2001) [1] 32049 11 Here is a

Ben Bolstad experienced something odd while running R CMD check over a package of ours using r-devel (yesterday's fresh). He tracked down the problem to a vignette calling 'library(MASS)'. Please kindly ignore if this is a known (and temporary) issue. Laurent ----- Forwarded message from Ben Bolstad <bolstad@stat.berkeley.edu> ----- Return-Path:

Hi, I've done a repeated ANOVA looking as follows: model<-aov(y~a*b*c+Error(d)) Now I want to get rid of some or all of the interactions. But neither AIC nor anova work. What is the appropriate function to test my model?

A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text Size: 3126 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/19991130/5cb00c0f/attachment.pl

Hello dear R members. I have been learning the Anova syntax in order to perform an SS type III Anova with repeated measures designs (thank you Prof. John Fox!) And another question came up: where/what are the (between/within) residuals for my model? ############ Play code: phase <- factor(rep(c("pretest", "posttest", "followup"), c(5, 5, 5)),