similar to: Help reading csv data in a dynamic arrays w/ loops... =)

Having implemented a GC for HLVM, I am now turning my attention to implementing a GC that supports parallelism. To do this, I would like to use atomic instructions as well as mutexes. What is the status of LLVM's atomic instrinsics (e.g. CAS)? Is anyone using them in real projects? I realised that an obvious test would be to compile some simple example programs with llvm-g++ instead of

Jon Harrop wrote: > Having implemented a GC for HLVM, I am now turning my attention to > implementing a GC that supports parallelism. To do this, I would like to use > atomic instructions as well as mutexes. What is the status of LLVM's atomic > instrinsics (e.g. CAS)? Is anyone using them in real projects? > > I realised that an obvious test would be to compile some

I have the following in my dialplan, counts the number of loops and when it hits greater then 5, exit. It works, but errors initially with, "syntax error, unexpected TOK_PLUS, expecting TOK_MINUS or TOK_LP or tolken; Input: +1". Could somebody tell me why? Thanks: ; **************************************** ; Setup a varriable to count the number of ; times the message has been

Nothing too interesting here, I was just playing around with the idea of a deduplication allocator for nbdkit (“allocator=dedup”, see https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2020/06/15/compressed-ram-disks/). Before implementing such a thing I wanted to know if there's much duplicated structure in a disk image. It seems to depend very critically on the block size, but also there are no significant

I'm working on version 2.0 The assertion at line 2380 of LegalizeDAG.cpp fails when it is trying to lower the add with i16. assertion reads: assert(MVT::isVector(Node->getValueType(0)) && "Cannot expand this binary operation!"); I am trying to compile a very simple program as follows: short var; void foo(void) { Var++; } The input bytecode, (in addition to the

On Sep 27, 2007, at 4:35 PM, <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com> <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com> wrote: > I'm working on version 2.0 > The assertion at line 2380 of LegalizeDAG.cpp fails when it is > trying to > lower the add with i16. > > assertion reads: > assert(MVT::isVector(Node->getValueType(0)) && > "Cannot expand this

This patch makes it possible to use a negative offset to count from the end of a variable. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes at sipsolutions.net> --- dovecot-1.0.rc2/doc/variables.txt 2006-04-12 09:39:31.000000000 +0200 +++ dovecot-1.0.rc2.mod/doc/variables.txt 2006-07-19 19:27:15.611041184 +0200 @@ -35,7 +35,10 @@ You can take a substring of the variable by giving optional offset

On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com wrote: > I am trying to lower all llvm operations to 8-bit. So far I was trying > to have llvm do all that for me using things like: ok > setOperationAction(ISD::ADD, MVT::ii,Promote); > setOperationAction(ISD::ADD, MVT::i8,Legal); > setOperationAction(ISD::ADD, MVT::i16,Expand); > setOperationAction(ISD::ADD,

hi guys, got this problem... in my controller, when i wanna do a @temp.count it fails... then i went to try counter = @temp.count which also failed.. thus, i feel that the count is not available for ActiveRecord::Base..so i went to the Model class eg. user.rb so in user.rb : ... def count_uesr count = 0 self.each do |record| count ++ end return count end then it ended up having

I am trying to lower all llvm operations to 8-bit. So far I was trying to have llvm do all that for me using things like: setOperationAction(ISD::ADD, MVT::ii,Promote); setOperationAction(ISD::ADD, MVT::i8,Legal); setOperationAction(ISD::ADD, MVT::i16,Expand); setOperationAction(ISD::ADD, MVT::i32,Expand); However, I keep getting an assertion failure that operation can not be expanded.

I moved my code to 2.1 but still the same. If I make ADD i16 legal, then it goes through, but it has problem expanding it to i8. Should I go ahead and customize it and do the same for all instructions? Or there is a more general thing that I can do? A. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Lattner Sent:

Sorry if this appears twice - I originally sent it nearly 18 hours ago and never saw it .. I have a need to have a unique integer number that can be used by a dynamic meetme room (I am wanting to redirect a call into a meeting room, and need a unique number to make sure I don't put two people together !) I was going to use a global variable ${NEXTMEETME}, and add one every time I

The attached patch makes the local IP address to which the client connected available to the authentication modules; i.e., the local IP address is available for substitution as %i for the mysql and pgsql modules. We needed this feature to support thousands of our legacy accounts which are authenticated by username/local_part (not the full email address) and IP address (one per domain). Timo,

Hello, Third version of the NUMA placement series Xen 4.2. All the comments received during v2''s review have been addressed (more details in single changelogs). The most notable changes are the following: - the libxl_cpumap --> libxl_bitmap renaming has been rebased on top of the recent patches that allows us to allocate bitmaps of different sizes; - the heuristics for deciding