similar to: Error Bars

Apologies for this - I'm sure I'm missing something somewhere... I've got a time series with several of missing values in it that I want to torture with R. But ts doesn't like the NA's, and I can't find any documentation telling me what to do about it. Help! Bob -- Bob O'Hara Metapopulation Research Group Division of Population Biology Department of Ecology and

Moi! I've spent a fun few hours trying to get a plot to look exactly the way I want it, and with a lot of help from Venables & Ripley (the book!) and the help pages, I've almost got it perfect. Only one problem now remains.... I'm using R1.2.2 on Windoze NT. I want to draw the graph as a Windows metafile (so at the moment I'm using the windows device, i.e. on the screen and

There is probably a simple and obvious answer to this, so sorry for wasting your time... I have a matrix of predictions from an proportional odds model (using the polr function in MASS), so the columns are the probabilities of the responses, and the rows are the data points. I have another column with the observed responses, and I want to extract the probabilities for the observed responses. As

I discovered a little problem when using the Windows NT release of R 1.0.1, and it's still there in R 1.1.0. The boiled down version is this: I want to draw the following plot and put it into a Postscript file: x <- c(1,2,3,4); y1 <- c(1,2,3,4); y2 <- c(2,2,2,2) Fred <- c(1,2) postscript(file="d:/Bob/Papers/IFM/try2.ps") plot(x,y1, type="l")

Hello from a presently sunny Helsinki! I've bee trying to repeat an analysis I did about 18 months ago (the reviewers of the paper want something adding to it). I'm using R1.5.0, but I couldn't see anything in the list of changes between this and 1.5.1 to suggest it would act any differently. The data is observational, on the changes in the population status of carabid beetles, and

Moi! I'm trying to add a rather long label to a y-axis, and it's so long that it won't fit into one line. However, things get strange when I try and split it over 2 lines. The problem seems to be the plus/minus symbol, which means I have to use expression(). I'm using R1.6.1 on Windoze 2000. As an example: thing1 <- expression(paste("log odds of survival probability (

Dear, I have a dataset with 4 subjects (see ID in example), and 4 treatment (see TRT in example) which are tested on 2 locations and in 3 blocs. By using Lattice dotplot, I made a graph that shows the raw data per location and per bloc. In that graph, I would like to have a reference line per bloc that refers to the first treatment (T1). However, I can not find how to do that. I can make

On 4/19/11 4:37 PM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: >> llvm-gcc -O3 -emit-llvm hello.c -c -o hello.bc >> it shows to me i should install llvm-gcc4.5 >> when i have installed llvm-gcc 4.5 i get all the times a wrong bc file >> as output, because when i try to execute it with lli it says to me >> invalid signature. > There is no llvm-gcc 4.5. Report this bug to Ubuntu,

Hi all, Please i need help, I have a method that takes 2 arguments with type char *: void branchPredict(char *b1, char *b2){ --- -- } i'm supposed to add this method, in an IR basic bloc: to add it into a basic bloc i do: //i: is the basic bloc std::vector<Value*> void_43_params; Constant* tbname = ConstantArray::get(M.getContext(),i->getNameStr() , true); Constant* pbname =

>>>>> Kurt Hornik >>>>> on Tue, 30 Jun 2020 06:20:57 +0200 writes: >>>>> Jan Gorecki writes: >> Thank you both, You are absolutely correct that example >> should be minimal, so here it is. >> l = list(a=new.env(), b=new.env()) unique(l) >> Just for completeness, env_list during check that raises

hi all, i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc the fucntion i have defined and declared at the begining of the module ie i have written a pass derived from a module pass virtual bool runOnModule(Module & M){ // i declared the fucntion and defined it for (Module::iterator a = M.begin(), b = M.end(); a != b; for (Function::iterator i = a->begin(), e =

Hi all, where I work we''ve cooked up a kind of ghetto profiler for our specs. It basically just does this: time = Time.now # run the spec puts "woah! dude. long spec." if time > 1.second I''m simplifying here. I think the threshold is actually 0.1 seconds, and we use more precise language, and highlight the spec in red via terminal colors, etc. But the way it works

2011/4/25 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi Nabila, > > > i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc > > you can't, because only terminators are allowed at the end of a basic > block. > However you can try to insert the call before the terminator. > Yes, i mean before the termininator, My problem is how to call a method suppose

I am using the following commands for plotting kernel density for three kinds of crops density(s22$Net_income_Total.1, bw="nrd0",adjust=1, kernel=c("gaussian"))->t plot(t, xlim=c(-30000,40000), main="Net Income Distribution", axes=F, ylim=c(0,0.00035). xlab="Value in Rupees") par(new=T) density(s33$Net_income_Total.1, bw="nrd0",adjust=1,

Hi Nabila, > i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc you can't, because only terminators are allowed at the end of a basic block. However you can try to insert the call before the terminator. ... > i tried to see an example with the demo, i saw that it instead of calling the > function, it repeats all the instruction that are existing in the function >

hi all please could u help me in these points 1- I have installed llvm-gcc 4.2 and llvm 2.8 with the synaptic package manager(ubuntu 10.10) every time i do this commande: llvm-gcc -O3 -emit-llvm hello.c -c -o hello.bc it shows to me i should install llvm-gcc4.5 when i have installed llvm-gcc 4.5 i get all the times a wrong bc file as output, because when i try to execute it with lli it says to me

On 5/20/11 5:46 PM, Nabila ABDESSAIED wrote: > Hi all, > > Please i need help, I have a method that takes 2 arguments with type > char *: > void branchPredict(char *b1, char *b2){ > --- > -- > } > i'm supposed to add this method, in an IR basic bloc: > to add it into a basic bloc i do: The problem is that you are passing arrays to the function instead of

Hi, Is it possible to have an array as the output of a custom fact? And then to pass it into a template in Puppet? I currently have a fact that looks like this: Facter.add("exports") do setcode do case Facter.hostname when (/thishost/i): [ "/local", "/local2" ] end end end & a template like this: <%

>>  i would like to add the value of  the size od a basic bloc to this >>> global variable >>> how to convert the size of a basic bloc to integer? >> >> Size = number of LLVM IR instructions there? If yes, just grab the >> number, convert it to ConstantIn and use as an initializer / store to >> variable. >> > > There's a typo in the

I had a failure over the weekend of my ext3 filesystems. Hardware: Dell 2550 (dual PIII 1 Ghz, 1GB ram, Acenic GigE card) Software: linux-2.4.14 ext3-2.4-0.9.15-2414 Trond's NFS patches (pathconf, tune,read,rpc_blk) The filesystem is RAID0 using LVM (1.0.1-rc4). The disks are connected using fiber channel (qlogic 2200, qlax00-4.27beta). I was generating high load on my nfs