similar to: creating chron object aggregates (e.g. sums by day)

> I'm trying to port the XL compiler (http://xlr.sf.net) to use the > LLVM back-end. So far, little trouble doing so. But there is one > aspect of the semantics of the LLVM IR that surprises me. Why are the > call, declare and define "halfway through" ABI conventions? Hrm? > I think it's the right thing to have a single high level node for > each call, as

*Hola!!! resulta que tengo unos datos de divisas ordenados por fechas (días) los que he convertido a formato tipo YYYY-MM-DD donde DD siempre es 01:* * * * EUR.resto$date<-as.Date(EUR.resto$date) EUR.resto$mo <- substr(EUR.resto$date,6,7) EUR.resto$yr <- substr(EUR.resto$date, 1,4)

On 6 nov. 07, at 06:17, Chris Lattner wrote: >> But then, why refuse aggregates as input or output of a call? What is >> the rationale? > > Because LLVM has no notion of aggregates as "values" that can be > passed around as atomic units. This is a very important design point, > and has many useful values. I see. You explained one of them in a message on the XL

Hello, I'm trying to port the XL compiler (http://xlr.sf.net) to use the LLVM back-end. So far, little trouble doing so. But there is one aspect of the semantics of the LLVM IR that surprises me. Why are the call, declare and define "halfway through" ABI conventions? I think it's the right thing to have a single high level node for each call, as opposed to separate

I am trying to optimize some code to take advantage of R loop-avoiding capabilities when working on vectors/arrays that contain time intervals. The calculation involves adding (for each time interval) the time portion (of events defined by their start and end times) that elapsed during time intervals. Any advice on how to improve this code. I searched the email archive and looked at the MASS

Dear all, I have a problem with interactions in lmer. I have 2 factors (garden and gebiet) which interact, plus one other variable (home), dataframe arr. When I put: / lmer (biomass ~ home + garden:gebiet + ( 1|Block), data = arr)/ it writes: /Error in lme4::lFormula(formula = biomass ~ home + garden:gebiet + (1 | : rank of X = 28 < ncol(X) = 30/ In the lmer help I found out that if not

On Tuesday 22 July 2008 01:23, Chris Lattner wrote: > David, I'm not sure I follow. It is, of course, very important for us > that llvm-gcc generate ABI compliant code on x86-64. I'm just saying > that if struct-return does not provide the ABI required for a specific > source construct that another lowering would be needed. Ah, ok. I misunderstood your statement. > In

On Jul 23, 2008, at 9:05 AM, David Greene wrote: >> In the case of X86-64, llvm-gcc does use aggregate return (for the >> interesting cases which return things in registers) and it does do >> the > > I don't follow. By "aggregate return" do you mean "structs as first > class > values?" That is, llvm-gcc generates a return of a struct by

I have been doing data analysis/modeling in R, connecting to SQL databases with RODBC (winXP client with R1.9.0 and win2k SQL server 2000). I am now trying to leverage some of the OLAP features to keep the data intensive tasks on the DB server side and only keep the analytical tasks within R (optimize use of memory). Is there any package that would allow to connect to OLAP cubes (as a client

Hi, I would like to know if there is a way to change a vector of arbitrary size to make it fits the nearest upper size multiple of a power of 2. -- Cordialy ---------------------------------------- Emmanuel POIZOT Cnam/Intechmer Digue de Collignon 50110 Tourlaville T?l : (33)(0)2 33 88 73 42 Fax : (33)(0)2 33 88 73 39 -----------------------------------------

Dear all, I have found the following (for me) incomprehensible behaviour of ISOdate (POSIXct): > ISOdate(1900,6,16) [1] "1900-06-15 14:00:00 Westeurop?ische Sommerzeit" > ISOdate(1950,6,16) [1] "1950-06-16 14:00:00 Westeurop?ische Sommerzeit" Note that in the first case I get the 15th of June back, not the 16th as I would have expected! This happened under R-1.7.1 on

Hi! Is not there an standard R function to retrieve the day of the year (since 1st Jan of the same year)? I know I can make my own using julian, but find it weird that having days(), months() etc doy() does not exist as an standard function. Also, is the following not a bit inconsistent? > a <- chron("20100506",format="ymd") > a [1] 100506 > years(a) [1] 2010

Dear R-people! I am using R 1.8.0, under Windows XP. While using ISOdate() and strptime(), I noticed the following behaviour when "wrong" arguments (e.g., months>12) are given to these functions: > ISOdate(year=2003,month=2,day=20) #ok [1] "2003-02-20 13:00:00 Westeurop?ische Normalzeit" > ISOdate(year=2003,month=2,day=30) #wrong day, but returns a value [1]

hi, I've troubles with some difftime objects. e.g. ISOdate(2001, 4, 26) - ISOdate(2001, 2, 26) - 2 works, telling me "Time difference of 57 days". But when I'd like to add days, such as ISOdate(2001, 4, 26) - ISOdate(2001, 2, 26) + 2 the function gives me an error. Function "as.COMDate.chron" of the Rbloomberg package doesn't work for that reason. I'm

errata: I am on 3.6 full stop. I *thought* there was a 3.7 available, based on the title of http://llvm.org/docs/ ("LLVM 3.7 documentation"). I suppose the docs are ahead of the release schedule? On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 9:44 AM Mircea Trofin <mtrofin at google.com> wrote: > Sorry, that phase is part of the PNaCl toolchain. This would be LLVM 3.6, > would your comments still

Hello all, I am doing an aggregation where the aggregating function returns not a single numeric value but a vector of two elements using return(c(val1, val2)). I don't know how to access the individual columns of that vector in the resulting dataframe though. How is this done correctly? Thanks, robert > agg <- aggregate(formula=df$value ~ df$quarter + df$tool, + FUN=cp.cpk,

I'm having difficulty finding a solution to my problem that without using a for loop. For the amount of data I (will) have, the for loop will probably be too slow. I tried searching around before posting and couldn't find anything, hopefully it's not embarrassingly easy. Consider the data.frame, Data, below Data Sub Tr IA FixInx FixTime p1 t1 1 1 200 p1 t1 2

I have a string such as fileName<-"Agg.20.20.20-all-01". All I want to do is pull the "20.20.20" and the "all" as strings. Obviously, they aren't always those values. The "20.20.20" can be "30.30.30" but it's always after the . which is next to the second g in Agg and it's always the same length. The all might not always be

Hi all, currently, GetElementPtrInst has a method getIndexedType, which has a templated variant. You pass in a begin and an end iterator, and it will find the indexed type for those. However, both iterators must iterate over Value*. For some argpromotion code, I would like to pass in iterators that iterate over unsigneds instead of Value*. I currently solve this by transforming my

Hi all, There might be a bug in DeadStoreElimination.cpp. This pass eliminates stores backwards aggressively in an end BB. It does not check dependencies on stores in an end BB though. For example, in this code snippet: ... 1. %sum.safe_r47.pre-phi = phi i64* [ %sum.safe_r47.pre, %entry.for.end_crit_edge ], [ %sum.safe_r42, %for.body ] 2. %call9 = call i32 @gettimeofday(%struct.timeval* %end,