similar to: Table Relationships and ActiveRecord Associations

Can anybody explain why RMA has to have a default normalization method: quantile-quantile? Why don't leave the choices to users? If I just want to use RMA to do a background correction without normalization, how should I specify the ? in the normalize.method="?" ? Hairong [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Using OpenSSL, is there a preferred/recommended rate of rekeying an encrypted stream of data? Does OpenSSL handle this for developers behind the scenes? Does it even need to be rekeyed? Thanks in advance. -sc -- Sean Chittenden -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 202 bytes Desc: not available

Hey all. I was an "early" adopter of mp3 (1994-1995), and I took great pains to use digital audio extractors and avoid jitter and whatnot thru proper hardware - back then, this was no mean feat. Well, I'm starting to switch to Ogg (dragging out all the CD's, starting over) and I want to know if anyone has an informed opinion on the merits or demerits of "normalization"

Hi all, Our migration is coming along nicely, everything seems to work like it should... I thought... Only samba-tool dbcheck reports five errors: root at dc1:~# samba-tool dbcheck Checking 1143 objects ERROR: Normalisation error for attribute 'objectClass' in 'CN=phdseminar,CN=Users,DC=my,DC=samba,DC=domain' Values/Order of values do/does not match: ['top',

Hi all, since the migration of our old Win2k domain to Samba4 some years ago I get a lot of errors like the following when doing a "samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix" : ERROR: Normalisation error for attribute whenCreated in CN=rpc-Ns-Group,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=samdom,DC=com value '19700101000000.0Z' should be '16010101000000.0Z' Fix normalisation for

All, I''m having some difficulties with the #{} replacements in ActiveRecord that I haven''t seen mentioned on the list. I have a number of has_many relationships that use finder_sql queries dependent on dynamic data. I''ve seen that you need to single-quote the queries to make your terms work, and that''s been good for simple cases. What I''ve found

3 tables. item, brand, commercial item -------- id name brand_id name brand --------- id name commercial ---------- id item_id The idea is that a commercial will have one item. each item will have brand. and a brand may have zero to many items. I can''t figure out how to make the relationships for my models. Eventually, i''d like to be able to show a brand name from a

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016, at 09:16, Olly Betts wrote: > I think my main concerns are about efficiency (since that a major > motivation for the current implementation, so slowing it down would be > annoying), and whether we can just make this the standard behaviour > rather than adding an option. The current implementation is O(n) and I took care to keep it at that. For the proposed term

How can I ask ActiveRecord to make it''s "has_many" code to work on some arbitrary relationship between two tables? ie neither field is a primary key The situation is that I am writing a Postfix management application and one of the tables to manage is the "alias" table. My primary key in the "mailbox" table is "id", but the alias table is just

Hello, I did a pca with over 200000 snps for 340 observations (ids). If I plot the eigenvectors (called rotation in prcomp) 2,3 and 4 (e.g. plot (rotation[,2]) I see a strange "column" in my data (see attachment). I suggest it is an artefact (but of what?). Suggestion: I used prcomp this way: prcomp (mat), where mat is a matrix with the column means already substracted followed by a

So I''ve worked through Agile Web Development with Rails and I''m now trying my first little app to get into the swing of things. Its a task tracking app where people can create tasks and assign them to others, and also log time against the tasks. I''m having trouble working out the model relationships. This is what I''ve got so far, but its not right as

Hello, I found an interesting ER diagram on the "Module: ActiveRecord::Associations::ClassMethods" page of the Rails Framework Documentation : http://ar.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Associations/ClassMethods.html At the beginning we can read ? Associations are a set of macro-like class methods for tying objects together through foreign keys. They express relationships like

Hi guys, In my Rails app, I have three models: A, B and C, with the following relationships: - B hasMany C - C belongsTo B I would like A to "has_one" instance of B+C. By that I mean A needs to be linked to a specific instance of B AND a specific instance of C. My first guess would be to create a fourth object, say B_plus_C that would: - belongs to B - belongs to C - belongs to A Is

Hi: I am looking for a good hands on web mashup tutorial? or books for that matter.. Google gives me bits and pieces of the info but not any step by step or hands on tutorial.. Thanks a bundle -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk"

Hi, Martijn, Thank you for reaching out, and apologies for late reply It is a dedicated metadata for volume normalization on our player. Please kindly refer to our company information here: https://labelgate.com/ application ID: SONN application name: Sony Normalizer contact e-mail address: taku.kurosawa at labelgate.com<mailto:taku.kurosawa at labelgate.com> Taku From: flac-dev

I am very confused about where to put the belongs_to and the has_one (and other relationship identifiers). I have read the RDoc and the agile book many times about this and I think i still see it backwards. Let me outline my app so you have an understanding... I have 2 tables: Schools { id, school_name, address_id } and Addresses { street1, street2, city, state, zip, country } *** this

On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 02:01:46PM +0100, Robert Stepanek wrote: > Removing the whole block will cause word-breaker to not correctly > handle halfwidth Katakana, such as "??????????" which it would treat > as a single term, whereas it should be two: ??????and ????). > > My pull request causes word-breaker to only handle halfwidth Katakana > and Hangul codepoints as

I am using R to do a loess normalisation procedure. In 1.5.1 I used the following commands to normalise the variable "logratio", over a 2d surface (defined by coordinates x and y): > array <- read.table("121203B_QCnew.txt", header=T, sep="\t") > array$logs555<-log(array$s555)/log(2) > array$logs647<-log(array$s647)/log(2) >

On Tue, Jan 9, 2024, at 3:28 AM, Olly Betts wrote: > Thanks, that looks good - now merged. Thanks! > Did you already check the other ranges for cased letters? I can but if > you have already there's not much point. I did not. If you find time, that'd be great. Otherwise I can make room for it in the next days. > > The fullwidth "????? ??????" tests suggests to

Thanks for your patience. I'm still confused of what I should do next. If it's not worth changing anything here as it's a rare case, sorry for my PR to github before the reply, maybe you need to close it on github. For another case, should I optimize current code with replacing set to a static array? Or rollback current modification to cjk-tokenizer and try to do some work with the