Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "has_many finder_sql #{id} single/double quotes voodoo"
2006 Jul 24
1
has_many + finder_sql
from the api I got:
<pre>
has_many :subscribers, :class_name => "Person", :finder_sql =>
''SELECT DISTINCT people.* '' +
''FROM people p, post_subscriptions ps '' +
''WHERE ps.post_id = #{id} AND ps.person_id = p.id '' +
''ORDER BY p.first_name''
</pre>
I would like to pass in the
2005 Dec 24
3
Avoiding HABTM field clobbering?
>From the docs:
"Note that any fields in the join table will override
matching field names in the two joined tables. As a
consequence, having an "id" field in the join table
usually has the undesirable result of clobbering the
"id" fields in either of the other two tables."
I do have an ID field in the join table, and as a
result it''s clobbering the ID
2006 Feb 28
3
[AR] #{id} namespace visibility used in finder_sql
Dears,
[Rails 1.0.0]
I''m working with a legacy schema, and around my 20+ models i''ve used
some AR constructs.
They are based on a finder_sql doing some dirty sql and using #{id}
from the ''pivot'' model for extracting data in other tables.
like :
class Division < ActiveRecord::Base
set_table_name "legacy_division"
set_primary_key
2006 Oct 30
2
It this possible: finder_sql-like behavior for belongs_to?
Guys,
I have a need to support as has_many/belongs_to relationship on a
legacy(kind of) schema. The reason I say kind of is that the schema does
have "id" columns that are used in many associations, but this particular
has_many/belongs_to association needs to support different ones.
I''ve attached to code at the end of this email. Suffice it to say I need to
use the standard
2005 Dec 27
0
How do I combine :finder_sql and :conditions to perform a sub-search on a custom has_many relationship?
I''m sure there''s something right under my nose that I''m missing.
I have two tables with two parallel one-to-many relationships. I wish
to use the :finder_sql parameter to essentially ''or'' the two foreign
keys.
What isn''t working for me is performing a ''sub-search''.
Let''s say the tables are "stores" and
2010 Jan 25
0
has_many, :finder_sql, setting attributes
Hi all,
My question is somewhat complicated, but bear with me. My project has a
number of models: User, Program, and Team. Users belong to multiple
Programs. Programs have multiple teams, but Teams belong to one
program. For each Program a User belongs to, he can belong to multiple
Teams. (Think of this in an athletic context where users are athletes,
programs are universities). So my
2006 Feb 13
2
categories and admin/categories - different controllers and templates?
Is there some way to have these two sets of URLs use
totally different controllers and templates?
categories/list
categories/show/1
admin/categories/list
admin/categories/edit/1
admin/categories/destroy/1
admin/categories/update/1
Besides, of course, using different controller names
;). The first URL is publicly accessible, while the
second contains admin functions. Also, with the
second,
2006 Jan 06
1
has_many with :finder_sql question
hi all,
I have a Class, Client, which has_many projects (Project class). the
projects depend on a session_id variable, however. So the question
is, how can I do the following:
has_many :projects,
:finder_sql => "SELECT p.* FROM projects p INNER JOIN
projects_users pu ON pu.project_id = p.id WHERE pu.user_id =
#{session[:user_id]}"
The problem is that I need to filter a
2006 Jun 09
1
finder_sql issue with has_many :through
I have an inner join query that Action Record can''t seem to pull off
conventionally, so I''m trying to use :finder_sql to utilize an sql query
that works beautifully in SQL. The problem is, when I try to call the
method, I get the following:
private method `gsub'' called for #<Array:0x267de04>
Here is my has_many code:
has_many :mod_privileges,
2006 Aug 13
1
Is :finder_sql using #{id} broken?
Hi All,
It seems that :finder_sql in a HABTM association only interprets a
single quoted #{id} the first time through a query. I see examples
of this being used in a few places (though with has_many) and I don''t
really see how to use :finder_sql without a #{id}.
Am I missing something or is this just broken?
--
Paul Haddad (paul.haddad@gmail.com paul@pth.com)
2005 Dec 27
3
Trouble combining :has_many, :finder_sql and :conditions to create a sub-search
I''m sure there''s something right under my nose that I''m missing. I
have two tables with two parallel one-to-many relationships. I wish to
use the :finder_sql parameter to essentially ''or'' the two foreign
keys.
What isn''t working for me is performing a ''sub-search''.
Let''s say the tables are "stores" and
2007 Mar 21
1
Eager Loading with custom :finder_sql
Is there any way to do eager loading when using custom :finder_sql ?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
2007 Sep 06
1
finder_sql patch problem
Hello,
I have the finder_sql problem and I found this patch
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/7576; but I don''t know how to use
this patch??
I copied all the changes into the correct files and restartet the
server of my ruby on rails application, but nothing changed.
Could someone tell me please how I have to use this patch??
Thanks
Manfred
2011 Sep 27
0
has_many with :finder_sql returns [nil]?
Is it supposed to do that? I find it very confusing.
AR 3.0.10
class Unit
has_many :units, :finder_sql => proc {
"SELECT * FROM `#{table_name}` WHERE `location_id`=#{id} AND
`location_type`=#{Location::UNIT}" }
end
Both should return []. However...
>> Unit.first.units.find([1000000])
[2011-09-27 10:05:11|main|debug] Unit Load (4.0ms) SELECT `units`.*
FROM `units`
2006 Aug 15
2
has_many + finder_sql & :include
Hello,
In a model I have:
has_many :things, :finder_sql => '' select * from other_things '' +
'' where id = #{id} ''
When I do MyClass.find(:all, :include => :things) I get a weird error:
from
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.14.4/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract_adapter.rb:120:in
2005 Dec 30
5
HABTM with finder_sql problem (Rails bug?)
I''m building an app that needs i18n support across the entire database
(i.e. localized attributes). In order to do this I''ve created a
special HABTM join table that can be associated with _any_ other
table:
create table language_strings (
for_table varchar(255) not null,
foreign_id int not null,
language_id varchar(5) not null,
attr_name varchar(255) not null,
value text
2006 Jan 17
15
legacy database and finder_sql nightmare!
This is my first rails app with a legacy database and I''m having a
terrible time getting the models set up correctly. I have an order
table that has a primary field named order_number. I have a name table
with a primary of item_number. These two tables are liked by the
item_number and the order_number, but not as you might think. If the
order_number is 2500, then each entry in
2005 Dec 28
4
undefined method `include''
I''m getting this error in Rails:
undefined method `include'' for
#<MenusController:0x408efd1c>
The offending code is:
require "rexml/document"
include REXML
I see there may be a problem with GCC 4 on OSX, but
I''m using Redhat with GCC 3.2.
http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/articles/2005/12/22/is-gcc-4-0-incompatible-with-ruby-on-os-x-and-elsewhere
2006 Jan 11
2
map.connect - redirect with 302?
Is it possible to write map.connect rules in route.rb
that externally redirect (HTTP 302) to other actions?
thanks
csn
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
2006 Feb 09
2
select options for HABTM?
I''ve looked through the docs and the wiki and can''t
figure out how to go about generating select options
and the update function for an item that has a HABTM
relationship.
I have a ''parks'' table and the park model has a HABTM
to the ''states'' table. On the park edit page, I''d like
a multiple select box to appear with all states show,