similar to: More trouble with empty subsets

Hi, all, I've been converting code from S-Plus ("S" for short) to R for a few weeks. Here are some differences I've found, aside from the big well-known ones (scoping, models, data storage) and the contents of Kurt Hornik's FAQ section 3.3.3. Let me start with the ones that seem like serious bugs or deficiencies: 1) LETTERS[c(NA,2)] in S is

Hi, all, I've been converting code from S-Plus ("S" for short) to R for a few weeks. Here are some differences I've found, aside from the big well-known ones (scoping, models, data storage) and the contents of Kurt Hornik's FAQ section 3.3.3. Let me start with the ones that seem like serious bugs or deficiencies: 1) LETTERS[c(NA,2)] in S is

Also in assign() there some arguments lacking in R such as 'frame' and 'where', though I guess that 'frame' in S may be similar to 'pos' in R. Harvey -----Original Message----- From: David Brahm [SMTP:a215020@agate.fmr.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:36 AM To: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch Cc: Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at; r-bugs@r-project.org Subject:

The result of rowsum() in R doesn't have the dimnames I'd expect, e.g.: > rowsum(matrix(1:12, 3,4), c("Y","X","Y")) [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] 1 2 5 8 11 2 4 10 16 22 whereas S-Plus gives the more useful result: [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] X 2 5 8 11 Y 4 10 16 22 This is because R's rowsum() code gives the

Hello, R-devel! I posted to R-help, and (inappropriately) to R-bugs, this R/S-Plus difference: > LETTERS[c(NA,2)] in S is c("","B"), but in R is c("NA","B") Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > I think we do not want to change this. ... > R> is.na(LETTERS[c(NA,2)]) [1] TRUE FALSE > so we really have NA but it is

Hi, I asked this question 2 years ago, and would like to know if the answer has changed. In S-Plus, I build databases of many large objects. In any given analysis, I only need a few of those objects, but attach'ing the whole database is fine since objects are only read as needed. How can I do the same thing in R, without reading the entire database? One possibility is to treat

Hi, all, I've been converting code from S-Plus ("S" for short) to R for a few weeks. Here are some differences I've found, aside from the big well-known ones (scoping, models, data storage) and the contents of Kurt Hornik's FAQ section 3.3.3. Let me start with the ones that seem like serious bugs or deficiencies: 1) LETTERS[c(NA,2)] in S is

Hi, The result of rowsum() in R doesn't have the dimnames I'd expect, e.g.: > rowsum(matrix(1:12, 3,4), c("Y","X","Y")) [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] 1 2 5 8 11 2 4 10 16 22 whereas S-Plus gives the more useful result: [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] X 2 5 8 11 Y 4 10 16 22 This is because R's rowsum() code gives

R> myfun <- function(x, ...) {x[...] <- 0; x} R> myfun(3) Error in myfun(3) : SubAssignArgs: invalid number of arguments It fails because no ... was passed. The workaround (and desired behavior) is: R> myfun <- function(x, ...) {if (missing(...)) x[] <- 0 else x[...] <- 0; x} R> myfun(3) [1] 0 Deja vu? This is the one piece of my PR#1110 (Oct 3, 2001) that I

Environment variables set with Sys.putenv() disappear (i.e. become "") after a while, especially after heavy-duty I/O. Example: R> x <- matrix(1., 3000, 3000) R> save(x, file="myx.RData") R> Sys.putenv(HOME="/tmp") R> while (Sys.getenv("HOME") != "") {cat("ok\n"); load("myx.RData")} The loop prints

Hi, I understand work is being done to improve read.table(), especially by Prof. Brian D. Ripley. I offer below a version that I wrote, in the hope some aspects of it may prove useful or at least inspire discussion. Be aware that my version differs in a couple fundamental ways that reflect my aversion to dataframes and factors. So it returns a list of vectors which are all character,

R> round(100000/3, -2) - 33300 [1] -7.275958e-12 I would have hoped for 0. The problem seems to be specifically for negative "digits". This is in 1.3.1 on Solaris 2.6 (full description at bottom). [Apologies for making everyone read this 3 times; my bug.report() burped.] Peter Dalgaard <p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk> says the problem is in fround.c, which reads in part:

An NA in the rownames of a matrix (or dataframe) causes misalignment when the matrix is printed: R> x <- matrix(1:12, 3,4, dimnames=list(letters[1:3], LETTERS[1:4])) R> rownames(x)[2] <- NA R> x A B C D a 1 4 7 10 <NA> 2 5 8 11 c 3 6 9 12 The bug is in function Rstrlen, in src/main/printutils.c. MatrixRowLabel and MatrixColumnLabel (same file) rely on Rstrlen

A new package "g.data" is available on CRAN, to create and maintain databases that work more like the S-Plus model. Here's the official Description for g.data (v1.2): Create and maintain delayed-data packages (DDP's). Data stored in a DDP are available on demand, but do not take up memory until requested. You attach a DDP with g.data.attach(), then read from it and assign

A new package "g.data" is available on CRAN, to create and maintain databases that work more like the S-Plus model. Here's the official Description for g.data (v1.2): Create and maintain delayed-data packages (DDP's). Data stored in a DDP are available on demand, but do not take up memory until requested. You attach a DDP with g.data.attach(), then read from it and assign

Hi, all! My project today is to write a speedy colSums(), which is a function available in S-Plus to add the columns of a matrix. Here are 4 ways to do it, with the time it took (elapsed, best of 3 trials) in both R and S-Plus: m <- matrix(1, 400, 40000) x1 <- apply(m, 2, sum) ## R=16.55 S=52.39 x2 <- as.vector(rep(1,nrow(m)) %*% m) ## R= 2.39 S= 8.52 x3 <-

In R-patched_2003-10-20, subsetted 1-D arrays no longer get converted to vectors. The NEWS file documents this change, as an indirect result of bug report 4110. I just wanted to mention this can break code in some rather obscure ways, such as this toy example: R> x <- sort(tapply(1:8, rep(1:4,2), sum)) # Was vector, now is 1D array R> y <- matrix(1:4, 1,4) #

Thanks to Henrik Bengtsson, Martin Maechler, Brian Ripley, Jeff Gentry and David Brahm for taking the time to answer my questions about INDEX files in R packages. My key take-aways were: 1) All of this will be changing a lot in R 1.7.0-to-be, so don't sweat the details. 2) Many people run R CMD build before they run R CMD check. I found this quite surprising. I did not realize that R

Any doubts about R's big-league status should be put to rest, now that we have a Sudoku Puzzle Solver. Take that, SAS! See package "sudoku" on CRAN. The package could really use a puzzle generator -- contributors are welcome! -- David Brahm (brahm at alum.mit.edu) [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ R-packages mailing list

Any doubts about R's big-league status should be put to rest, now that we have a Sudoku Puzzle Solver. Take that, SAS! See package "sudoku" on CRAN. The package could really use a puzzle generator -- contributors are welcome! -- David Brahm (brahm at alum.mit.edu) [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ R-packages mailing list