similar to: No subject

Dear All, I have tried twice more to install R-1.3.1 on my sparc with no success. I thank you for the useful suggestions that were sent, even though they didn't seem to help. I am sorry that I was a bit cryptic in my last note. Frankly, I didn't know what information you needed, so I was waiting for someone to ask some questions. I hope the following will answer your questions. I

Dear All, I am trying to convert some S-plus code that I have to run MCMC into R-code. The program works in S-plus, but runs slowly. I have managed to source the program into R. R recognizes that the program is there; for example, it will display the code when I type the function name at the prompt. However, the program will not run. When I try to run the program, I get the following error

Dear List, I am running R-Aqua 2.1.0 on a powerbook with Mac OS/X 10.3.9. Here is what I get when I type "version" at the R-prompt. platform powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0 arch powerpc os darwin7.9.0 system powerpc, darwin7.9.0 status Patched major 2 minor 1.0 year

Hi, System: Netra 1405, 4x450Mhz, 4GB RAM and 2x146GB (root pool) and 2x146GB (space pool). snv_98. After a panic the system hangs on boot and manual attempts to mount (at least) one dataset in single user mode, hangs. The Panic: Dec 27 04:42:11 base ^Mpanic[cpu0]/thread=300021c1a20: Dec 27 04:42:11 base unix: [ID 521688 kern.notice] [AFT1] errID 0x00167f73.1c737868 UE Error(s) Dec 27

I am trying to limit outgoing SMTP traffic to about 14 Mbps and these are the IPFW rules I am using. ${fwcmd} add pipe 1 tcp from 192.168.0.0/24 to any 25 out via dc0 ${fwcmd} pipe 1 config bw 14Mbit/s I've tried multiple tweaks to the pipe rule and I seem to be missing something. I only get about half the bandwidth I specify. Is this normal behavior? Is there something wrong

Hi Pawel, > We can not let it die and I volunteer to keep the Sparc alive! > > My SPARCstation pizzaboxes can be ready for action in a day or two. there are three sparc buildbots which are hooked up to lab.llvm.org. They are currently idle because no builders have been scheduled to use them: # gcc54 36G 0.5 GHz TI UltraSparc IIe (Hummingbird) / 1.5 GB RAM / Sun Netra T1 200 /

Dear R users, I am using R version 2.0.1 (2004/11/15) on an i386-pc-mingw32 platform. I encounter the following problem while using cumsum: > a <- rep(0.01, 100) > b <- cumsum(a) > sum(a) == 1 [1] TRUE > b[100] == 1 [1] FALSE Am I missing something? Should cumsum have such an outcome? Thanks in advance for any clarifications any of you can offer. Regards, Makram Talih --

We're using Samba 1.9.18p10 on a Linux 2.0.35 box as a fileserver chiefly for software development under VC++. Builds are done from the command line, not the IDE. I'm seeing rather slow build performance under NT4SP3. Build performance is fine under Win95. Build performance is also good when building from Samba 1.9.18p8 running on a Sun UltraSparc. To give some concrete figures, building

Overall the build process for dovecot is very clean. I did however run into a significant problem when it came to locating the mysql libraries, especially when building a 64 bit executable but similar problems occured building a 32 bit executable. I am describing the 64 bit build issues below since that is the worst case scenario. Fixing the 64 bit build will automatically fix the 32 bit

On Jun 10, 2024, at 7:22?PM, Jack McGee wrote: > > mythuser at amethi:~$ upsdrvctl start > Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.7.4 > Can't open /etc/nut/ups.conf: Can't open /etc/nut/ups.conf: Permission denied If you are sure the driver is not running (unclear from "eliminating the no connection error"; instead check for the absence of the usbhid-ups

Dear R-users, Is there a preferred method for testing whether a real symmetric matrix is positive definite? [modulo machine rounding errors.] The obvious way of computing eigenvalues via "E <- eigen(A, symmetric=T, only.values=T)$values" and returning the result of "!any(E <= 0)" seems less efficient than going through the LU decomposition invoked in

On 12/03/2016 10:35 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Dec 3, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Jack McGee <jack at greendesk.net> wrote: >> Dec 3 08:38:16 amethi upsd[18234]: not listening on ::1 port 3493 >> Dec 3 08:38:16 amethi upsd[18234]: listening on 127.0.0.1 port 3493 >> Dec 3 08:38:16 amethi upsd[18234]: no listening interface available > I can't say I fully understand

On 12/03/2016 09:36 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: >> On Dec 3, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Jack McGee <jack at greendesk.net> wrote: >> >> But doesn't this still indicate an error: >> >> mythuser at amethi:/etc/nut$ upscmd -l CyberPower1 >> Error: Connection failure: Connection refused > Correct - "upsc", "upscmd" and "upsrw" need to

Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith at ieee.org wrote: >Not only that, but people forget that SPARC is not sold by just Sun. >SPARC is an IEEE standard licensed under "fair and non-discriminatory" >terms. The SPARC ISA and most architectural details are freely >available. Yep - but what is your point with bringing that up? >The _majority_ of my Solaris/SPARC experience in more

Jason Welsh wrote: > http://www.ebay.com/bhp/ibm-x3650 > > ;) > a) Please don't top post. b) 'T'ain't funny, McGee. They don't have the budget, and they need this server *now*... it's one of their compute nodes, and at least one person is dead in the water. mark, incredibly frustrated with this stupid system > > Jason > > > > On

Hi, I'm just considering buying two Telecoms grade Sun Netra's to run a lab-based VoIP solution. Not my immediate thoughts as a VoIP platform, but from what I've heard, they can run Linux, and run it well. Only thing is: The Wiki and the Whitepaper just state that Asterisk is for the x86 architecture, but has been compiled to run on PPC architectures. No mention of UltraSparc.

On 12/03/2016 10:08 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: >> On Dec 3, 2016, at 11:01 AM, Jack McGee <jack at greendesk.net> wrote: >> >> I did restart those services, no change. >> > $ ps auxww|grep [/]nut > root 13074 0.0 0.0 37844 2628 ? Ss 08:42 0:00 /lib/nut/upsmon > nut 13076 0.0 0.0 45632 5148 ? S 08:42 0:00 /lib/nut/upsmon

On 12/10/2016 07:42 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: >> On Dec 9, 2016, at 10:40 PM, Jack McGee wrote: >> >> ? nut-server.service - LSB: Network UPS Tools initscript >> Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/nut-server; bad; vendor preset: enabled) >> Active: active (running) since Fri 2016-12-09 13:48:34 CST; 7h ago >> Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8) >>

On 12/03/2016 08:03 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Dec 2, 2016, at 10:23 PM, Jack McGee <jack at greendesk.net> wrote: >> This is new install on Ubuntu 16.04, using packages from Synaptic, >> Network UPS Tools upsd 2.7.2 >> >> I am getting these messages in the terminal: >> Broadcast message from nut at amethi (somewhere) (Fri Dec 2 12:33:03 2016): >>

Hi list I just compiled 3.0rc1 on Solaris 9 (UltraSparc IIe) with gcc 3.3. Seems to work fine but I am surprised by the enormous size of the binaries: (ub-blade1):/usr/local/samba/sbin # ll total 232272 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 44719632 Aug 28 15:07 nmbd -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 89726544 Aug 28 15:07 smbd -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 44807356 Aug 28 15:07 swat -rwxr-xr-x