similar to: habtm doesn''t save old IDs

I realize this is slightly off-topic, but I''m stumped and I hope someone else has had the same problem. When running a rails app using webrick (script/server), I can load any given page which involves a controller once, and any subsequent page loads trigger a "Segmentation fault" without any other info. This problem is very new, and has only started occurring since I last

This betrays my lack of javascript knowledge, but is it possible to watch a whole form for changes and activate some javascript when those changes occur without any remote request? That is, I want to do exactly what observe_form does, but without the ajax call actually happening. I realize I could use the form_tag :onchange parameter, but that seems to be incapable of doing things like

hey, i my database i have users and groups, each user can get in different groups my db structure: table groups: id, name, basegroup, firm_id table users: id, firstname, lastname, email table groups_users: group_id, user_id my relation is a many to many: class Group < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :users end class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many

I think I found a bug in dovecot which I'm not sure where to fix. (I may even have found a reference to it in an archived list message from Jul 2003.) Here is the situation: dovecot (dovecot-0.99.10.4) running with an imap server on an mbox system is queried by a local client program, like Mail.app, and is told the "Received" date of the message (presumably sent through

Hi all, Is it possible to configure red cloth to escape a block such as: ------------------------------------------------------------------ Hello, _this_ works *beautifull* [code lang="ruby"] def foo bar end [/code] ------------------------------------------------------------------ The text in the [code] block should not be parsed by Red Cloth''s to_html method. I cannot

What is the best way of checking this? I have 3 tables: groups users group_members class GroupMember < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :group belongs_to :user validates_uniqueness_of :user_id, :scope => "group_id" Then I want a method here that checks if a given user is a member of a given group. What is the right way of doing that? def

Hi all, happily coding along, but it seems a belongs_to record is not saved. # Create some stuff def create_project @contact = Contact.new @project = Project.new(@params[''project'']) @project_contact = ProjectContact.new(@params[''collect'']) @project.project_contact = @project_contact contact =

Hi, how can I get Rails to generate SQL queries with conditions in the JOIN clause? What I would want is: SELECT * FROM people p LEFT OUTER JOIN jobs j (p.job_id = j.id AND j.salary > 9999999) I tried People.find(:all, :include => ''jobs'', :conditions => ''jobs.salary > 9999999'') but that generates SELECT * FROM people p LEFT OUTER

Im writing a module in the lib directory. If I change the module, the changes are not visible to the application when i releod the web page (i am in the development evironment). I must restart the web server (WEBrick) and so i see the changes... but I lost more time. How can I reload the module in the dirictory lib, without reload WEBrick? Thanks so much --Reis -- Posted via

Imagine I want to track people, and the clubs that they belong to. table people with columns person_id, person_name table clubs with columns club_id, club_name And I have the association table: table clubs_people with columns person_id, club_id Now I know how to do this habtm between the two, in order to associate people with clubs that they belong to. However my application also needs a

Hello, I have a question about HABTM and counting records. I have these models class Sort < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :reports end class Report < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :region has_and_belongs_to_many :subjects has_and_belongs_to_many :sorts end And i would like to get a count like @sort.reports.count The problem is get this query:

I have a photographers app that requires giving access to galleries for users. in one part, I want to be able to define gallery access for a user seperate from updating any of the user info. I have this function: def edit_access @user = User.find(params[:id]) @user.galleries = Gallery.find(params[:gallery_ids]) if params[:gallery_ids] if @user.update_attributes(params[:user])

I have a class Player, and a class Game. Game has two HABTM relationships to the Player table through seperate relationship tables. class Game < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :players, :uniq => true has_and_belongs_to_many :victors, :class_name => ''Player'', :uniq => true end When I add Player A to players, and Player B to victors, and save the

If I have a class, Asset, which has and belongs to many associated Asset objects, how do I do this? has_and_belongs_to_many :associated_assets, :class => "Asset", :foreign_key => ?????, :association_foreign_key => ????? Right now, my table has a :first_asset_id and a :second_asset_id, but I don''t see how the objects themselves are supposed to distinguish one from the

I have a problem related with the HABTM relationships with checkboxes. I''ve got a profile and a service model, both related with has_and_belongs_to_many. The problem is that i can insert new data in the profiles_services table, however, i cant delete already existing data. What could be the problem? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message

This has me scratching my head: a Person has many Things a Person has many Collections a Collection has many Things ...Things in a Collection are ordered ...Things in a Collection can be related to (created by) any User ...a collection has additional attributes, such as a name etc I am confused about habtm in rails (especially when using acts_as_habtm_list) vs. going the :through route.

hey, i have users who are in groups, and i have a search form, where i can search on group, user lastname, and user firstname. All this is also with pagination. these are my models class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :groups end class Group < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :users end in my controller i do this THIS works (but in need pagination) @users2

I am having a problem with two models that each have a HABTM relationship to the other. For example: CREATE TABLE people (id INT, name TEXT); CREATE TABLE teams (id INT, name TEXT); CREATE TABLE people_teams (person_id INT, team_id INT); The person model has: has_and_belongs_to_many :teams And the team model has: has_and_belongs_to_many :people The trouble comes when trying to destroy

Hey gang, How does STI work with HABTM? For instance...let''s say I have the following models ----- Category < ActiveRecord::Base Item < ActiveRecord::Base Product < Item Deal < Item ----- Each product or deal can have categories. Would I then setup Item with has_and_belongs_to_many :categories, then create a table categories_items ??? Is there a better way to do it?

Taking time off from programming is always painful :-). I have the following Models: ==== class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :problems end class Problem < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :user has_and_belongs_to_many :tags end ==== And the following migrations: ==== create_table "problems" do |t| t.column "user_id", :integer