similar to: using identity link for binomial familly with glm

I would like to do an R glm() with family = binomial(link="loglog") Right now, the cloglog link exists, which is nice when the data have a heavy tail to the left. I have the opposite case and the loglog link is what I need. Can someone suggest how to add the loglog link onto glm()? It would be lovely to have it there by default, and it certainly makes sense to have the two opposite

I'm having trouble using binomial(link="cloglog") with GLMM in lme4, Version: 0.5-2, Date: 2004/03/11. The example in the Help file works fine, even simplified as follows: fm0 <- GLMM(immun~1, data=guImmun, family=binomial, random=~1|comm) However, for another application, I need binomial(link="cloglog"), and this generates an error for me: >

Hello, I'm not a Stata user so I'm trying to reproduce Stata results that are given to me in R. I would like to use a GLM with a complementary log-log function. The stata code I have is: glm c IndA fia, family(binomial s) link(cloglog) offset(offset) The R code is: glmt <- glm(data=dataset, c ~ IndA + fia, offset = offset, family = binomial(link = cloglog)) Which yields

Hello, I have a hierarchical dataset of this form and am trying to analyze it in R. 1 subject Tested under 2 conditions: A and B 10 sesssions in each condition In each session, 2 kinds of tests: Test 1 and Test 2 200 independent repetitions of each test-type, with 200 Yes/No answers So I think this is a 2 x 2 x 10 x 2 setup What I want to know is whether the difference in percentage of yes

this may be a better question for r-devel, but ... Is there a particular reason (and if so, what is it) that the inverse link is not in the list of allowable link functions for the binomial family? I initially thought this might have something to do with the properties of canonical vs non-canonical link functions, but since other link functions (probit, cloglog, cauchit, log) are allowed, I

Hello R users, I have some troubles to modify the "per default" legend in the scatterplot.matrix using the car package. Here is my code: -------------------------------------------------------------------- scatterplot.matrix(~ a + b + c, groups=treatment, by.groups=F, data=newfile3, smooth=T, pch=c(16,4), cex=1.3,

Dear R users, Is someone know how to get a simple analysis of variance table using other random distribution than normal (ex: Poisson or Binomial)? When I try, I recieved this message: (See my R code below) --------------------- R response ---------------------------- Erreur dans anova(fit.poisson) : single argument anova for GLMMs not yet implemented OR Erreur dans anova(fit.binomial) :

Hello, I am looking at the job satisfaction data below, from a problem in Agresti's book, and I am not sure where the degrees of freedom come from. The way I am fitting a binomial model, I have 168 observations, so in my understanding that should also be the number of fitted parameters in the saturated model. Since I have one intercept parameter, I was thinking to get 167 df for the Null

Dear R users this may be a simple question - but i would appreciate any thoughts does anyone know how you would get one lower and one upper confidence interval for a set of data that consists of proportions. i.e. taking a usual confidence interval for normal data would result in the lower confidence interval being negative - which is not possible given the data (which is constrained between

I am trying to figure out how to apply a loglog link to a binomial model (dichotomous response variable with far more zeros than ones). I am aware that there are several relevant posts on this list, but I am afraid I need a little more help. The two suggested approaches seem to be: 1) modify the make.link function in GLM, or 2) use the loglog or cloglog functions in the VGAM package.

I'm having trouble getting fun="cloglog" to work with plot on a survfit object. Here are the data I used for the commands that follow. days status 2 0 2 0 5 1 9 0 14 1 16 0 16 0 17 0 29 1 30 0 37 1 37 0 39 1 44 0 44 0 58 0 60 1 67 1 68 1 82 1 82 1 86 0 86 0 89 1 93 0 97 1 100 0 100 0 100 0 > library(survival) Loading required package: splines > eg1.km <-

I'm trying to use GLMM in library(lme4), R 1.9.0pat, updated just now. I get an error message I can't decipher: library(lme4) set.seed(1) n <- 10 N <- 1000 DF <- data.frame(yield=rbinom(n, N, .99)/N, nest=1:n) fit <- GLMM(yield~1, random=~1|nest, family=binomial, data=DF, weights=rep(N, n)) Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : ..1 used in an incorrect

Hello, I have different results from these two softwares for a simple binomial GLM problem. >From Genmod in SAS: LogLikelihood=-4.75, coeff(intercept)=-3.59, coeff(x)=0.95 >From glm in R: LogLikelihood=-0.94, coeff(intercept)=-3.99, coeff(x)=1.36 Is there anyone tell me what I did wrong? Here are the code and results, 1) SAS Genmod: % r: # of failure % k: size of a risk set data

Hello everybody, does anybody know how the function plot.survfit exactly works? I'd like to plot the log of the cummulative hazard against the log time by using plot.survfit(...fun="cloglog") which does not work correctly. The scales are wrong and there is an error message about infinit numbers. It must have something to do with the censored data, doesn't it? #Example:

Just a quick point which may be easy to correct. Whilst typing the wrong thing into R 2.2.1, I noticed the following error messages, which seem to have some stray quotation marks and commas in the list of available families. Perhaps they have been corrected in the latest version (sorry, I don't want to upgrade yet, but it should be easy to check)? > glm(1 ~ 2,

I would like to get horizontal numbers on the both axes: X and Y. I got horizontal numbers only on the Y axis when adding las=2, How to obtain a horizontal orientation for number on scale also for the X axis (now they are vertical)? Here is my code: plot(survfit(Y~addicts$clinic), fun="cloglog", las=2) [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

windows xp R 2.8.1 I am trying to plot the -log(log(survival)) to visually test the proportional hazards assumption of a Cox regression. The plot, which should give two lines (one for each treatment) gives only one line and a warning message. I would appreciate help getting two lines, and an explanation of the warning message. My problem may the that I have very few events in one of my strata,

Dear Lister, I am facing a strange problem fitting a GLM of the negative binomial family. Actually, I tried to estimate theta (the scale parameter) through glm.nb from MASS and could get convergence only relaxing the convergence tolerance to 1e-3. With warning messages: glm1<-glm.nb(nbcas~.,data=zonesdb4,control=glm.control(epsilon = 1e-3)) There were 25 warnings (use warnings() to see

Hi, I would like apply different link functions from Aranda-Ordaz (1981) family to large binary dataset (n = 2000). The existing links in glm for binomial data (logit, probit, cloglog) are not adequate for my data, and I need to test some other transformations. Is it possible to do this in R? And how? Thank you for your help, /Sharon

Hello, The following code: > binomial(identity) Generates an error message: Error in binomial(identity) : link "identity" not available for binomial family; available links are ?logit?, ?probit?, ?cloglog?, ?cauchit?, ?log? While : > binomial("identity") Yields an identity-binomial object that works as expected with stats::glm The error in the first example mislead