similar to: ordered factors in tree package - bug?

I am new to R, and didn't know which list to send this to, since it is a bug report about a package, not about core R... I have created a regression tree using 4 predictors: 3 are unordered (binary) predictors, and the last is a date (integer), which I declare to be an ordered factor. However, the tree treats the date as if it were un-ordered, splitting into non-consecutive subsets. My code

Hi all, I have 2 questions: 1)How do I calculate the mean on an imported txt file? I've imported the file below and that's what it looks like imported. How do I then calcuate the mean, median, or mode on the column LeafArea using the desktop R package? Any help would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks, Nat LeafType Leaflets LeafArea ShapeRatio LeafWeight LeafThickness 1 1

Dear R Users,i am very new to R. I want your help on an issue regarding distance matrix and cluster analysis i had discharge data of 4 rivers(a,b,c,d) in 4 vectors each having 364 values > dput(qmu)structure(list(a = c(0.26, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.24, 0.23, 0.22, 0.21, 0.21, 0.21, 0.2, 0.19, 0.19, 0.19, 0.19, 0.18, 0.18, 0.18, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17,

$ R --version R 1.6.1 (2002-11-01). So I would like to perform principal components analysis on a 16X16 correlation matrix, [princomp(cov.mat=x) where x is correlation matrix], the problem is princomp complains that it is not non-negative definite. I called eigen() on the correlation matrix and found that one of the eigenvectors is close to zero & negative (-0.001832311). Is there any way

Hi, I have a 3d array as below, I want to make this array to a matrix of p=50(rows) and n=20(columns) with the coverage values . The code before the array is: library(binom) Loading required package: lattice pi.seq<-seq(from = 0.01, to = 0.5, by = 0.01) no.seq<-seq(from = 5, to = 100, by = 5) cp.all = binom.coverage( p = pi.seq, n = no.seq , conf.level = 0.95, method = "exact")

Hi all, I computed a Wilks Lambda Test with manova: > df.man <- manova(df.mul ~ 1, na.rm=TRUE) > summary(df.man, intercep=T, test="Wilks") Df Wilks approx F num Df den Df Pr(>F) (Intercept) 1 0.0002824 393.3 9 1 0.03911 * Residuals 9 --- Signif. codes: 0 `***' 0.001 `**' 0.01 `*'

Hi all, I am trying to create images in R suitable for journal publication. I'd like to make an image that is 3.6" wide and 5.08" length, and 1200 dpi. When I create a tiff file that is 800 dpi and 4x4", it works (although doesn't look good). But when I create a tiff that is the size and dpi I want, it doesn't work. I get the following error: Error in tiff(filename =

Greetings, I am running a buch of wilcox tests and need to be able to rapidly export the results into a csv file. I have attached example code as well as my attempts to get what I need. I have tried unlist,cbind,rbind etc but I am obvously missing something simple. FYI I am actually running about 50 WRS tests per dataset, this is just an example. Thanks 10^6 Mike AKCCR <-

Hello, I have a problem with the hist() function and showing densities. The densities sum to 50 and not to 1! I use R version 2.9.1 (2009-06-26) and I load the seqinR library. My data is the following vector: [1] 0.1400000 0.2000000 0.2200000 0.2828283 0.1600000 0.1600000 0.3600000 [8] 0.1600000 0.2200000 0.2600000 0.2000000 0.3000000 0.2200000 0.2342342 [15] 0.1800000 0.2200000 0.1600000

Dear list, I have observed a weird behaviour from R --- apologies if I am missing something obvious! df3f826f28 df3f826f28 Say you type in R: >c.preec <- 10074 >c.gd <- 2200 >p1 <- .2 >c.neo <- p1*9451 + (1-p1)*3883 >n.preec <- 3710 >n.gd <- 2650 >n.neo <- 2120 >n.pcos <- 53000 >unit.met <- 94 >cost.met <- 94*n.pcos >effect <-

Hello, I was interested in how much Type-Based Alias Analysis helps to optimize code. For that purpose, I've compared three sets of benchmarks: compiled without TBAA, compiled with a default TBAA metadata format, and compiled with new TBAA metadata format. As a set of benchmarks, I've used the LLVM test suite (http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#test-suite-overview) which has a lot of

Kemal, It sounds like you are doing something wrong. I strongly recommend that you profile your application to see exactly where the CPU time is being spent. AMD happens to have a nice profiler called CodeAnalyst that they give away for free. And it's plenty usable on Intel CPUs as well. http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/DevelopWithAMD/0,,30_2252_3604,00.html Make sure you test a

Hi, LLVM 2.1-pre1 test results: Linux (SUSE) on x86 (P4) Release mode, but with assertions enabled LLVM srcdir == objdir # of expected passes 2250 # of expected failures 5 I ran the llvm-test suite on my desktop while I was also working on that PC, so don't put too much trust in the timing info. Especially during the "spiff" test the machine was swapping

#this is a daily series of precipitation data. I would like to condense it into weekly means. How can I do this #as a side note I would like to do this same thing to two years worth of fifteen minute interval data and make it into #a series of daily averages (there are 96 readings per day) #is aggregate the right function? or... y <- c(1.23, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0.27, 0, 0.29, 0, 0, 0,

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:42:18PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote: > The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > [...] > > 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source. > Compile everything. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite > (make TEST=nightly report). > > Send

Hi All ! Recently in the mailing list there was the question about benchmarking LLVM. I was told that LLVM get's benchmarked in the nightly test. While this is true, I wanted to have a tool to compare LLVM against other compilers, so I wrote a little python program (attached) that filled my need. It is completely outside of the LLVM makefile framework, but this stems from the fact that I

Hello - I am using glmnet to generate a model for multiple cohorts i. For each i, I run 5 separate models, each with a different x variable. I want to compare the fit statistic for each i and x combination. When I use auc, the output is in some cases is < .5 (.49). In addition, if I compare mean MSE (with upper and lower bounds) ... there is no difference across my various x variables, but

Target: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 on amd64. autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.0 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release

Hello everyone,           I have a basic question regarding logical operators. > x<-seq(-1,1,by=0.02) > x   [1] -1.00 -0.98 -0.96 -0.94 -0.92 -0.90 -0.88 -0.86 -0.84 -0.82 -0.80 -0.78  [13] -0.76 -0.74 -0.72 -0.70 -0.68 -0.66 -0.64 -0.62 -0.60 -0.58 -0.56 -0.54  [25] -0.52 -0.50 -0.48 -0.46 -0.44 -0.42 -0.40 -0.38 -0.36 -0.34 -0.32 -0.30  [37] -0.28 -0.26 -0.24 -0.22 -0.20 -0.18 -0.16

Hola. Necesito calcular los porcentajes de un valor dado (valores) como porcentaje de la suma de ese mismo valor pero agrupando por una tercera columna (en este caso, podría ser Mes-Año). El resultado sería el que se ve en la var: "EnR" Necesito además que ese resultado quede pegado en mi data.frame. Año Mes AñoMes Factor Valores enR 2015 1 2015-1 a 105 0.25 2015 1 2015-1 b 104 0.24 2015