similar to: db vs filesystem

Hello, I'm new to dovcot, but have serious issues with dovecot and IMAP. I'm struggling with low IMAP performance but have no glue, where to start my search. It is a small office setup. 10 Mailaccounts. Mine is the biggest with 4GB in size. But searching for mail takes several seconds... Zu switch to specific folder also takes some seconds. To long in my opinion. I use esxi 6.0

On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 04:53:16PM +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > >On 15/03/2023 16:47, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: >>On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 11:29:10AM -0400, CaptainTrips28 via samba wrote: >>>Encountering a strange one... has been occuring since samba 4.15.x and >>>continues to occur even in 4.17.5 and 4.18 >>> >>>Issue does not

Hello, I am running a Samba 4 DC, recently upgraded to the latest version and I have just installed a member server to run as a File Server (Samba 4.1.9). While it seems to be working properly, we are getting a lot of zombie nmbd processes on the member server, running the command *pidof nmbd* results in: *[root at BHFS01 etc]# pidof nmbd* *12861 12644 12404 12236 12071 11885 11720 11553 11388

Hello everyone, Today is exactly 10 years ago that tinc 1.0 was released. I would have hoped to celebrate this by releasing 1.0.22 and 1.1pre8 today, but this will instead happen in one week. Tinc 1.1 is close to becoming stable, and I hope to release 1.1.0 before the end of the year. The main features of tinc 1.1 are the improved security over tinc 1.0, and a much nicer interface that makes it

Hello everyone, Today is exactly 10 years ago that tinc 1.0 was released. I would have hoped to celebrate this by releasing 1.0.22 and 1.1pre8 today, but this will instead happen in one week. Tinc 1.1 is close to becoming stable, and I hope to release 1.1.0 before the end of the year. The main features of tinc 1.1 are the improved security over tinc 1.0, and a much nicer interface that makes it

I just posted a ticket regarding possible memory leaks in the c layer exception handling: http://ferret.davebalmain.com/trac/ticket/187 (This mail is just to draw attention to it :) regards, //Martin -- ################################################################### Things are more like they used to be than they are now. ###################################################################

Tinc newbie here so apologies if this is obvious or has been discussed already; I did search but couldn't find anything. I'm testing tinc 1.1pre10 between a Windows 7 client and Linux server. The Linux machine is on the internet and the Windows machine is on my home network behind NAT. I have successfully configured a Linux client on my home network to communicate with the server

I much regret in many ways having to ask this question below. But our business needs now demand more than we think we can deliver using open source software exclusively. What is the best way to 'suck up' all of the domain group and user data from a current samba 3.0.21a PDC into a microsoft windows 2003 server? We have two basic needs that demand we now introduce active directory servers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- The autodetection routines for some linux modules can tie up the machine for several seconds at a time. By trying to open devices not present on the machine, a local user can disrupt service considerably. A very simple exploit is victim$ ls /dev/*/* repeatedly. A suggested fix is to remove or chmod 0 device nodes for hardware not installed on the

> On Jun 17, 2016, at 11:27 AM, TB Schardl via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hey Ben, > > Thank you for your comments. I've put my response inline. > > Cheers, > TB > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Craig, Ben via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > On 6/16/2016 2:48 PM,

I''ve finally started a blog. I really didn''t want to go public with it until I was sure I keep it up, but DHH posted a entry to his blog that I feel compelled to comment on. You can read about it on my blog: http://www.bloglines.com/blog/CurtHibbs Curt

Hi, I do a tgz-backup some maildir-folders with n*1000 off files and a lot of GB in storage. The backuped maildirs are removed after the tar. My assumption was, that the free diskspace should be bigger after that, but from what I get with df, it looks like I'm loosing space. Currently the tgz is saved on the same disk/mountpoint. Any hint, why removing the maildirs dont free diskspace as

Yes, you can: whenever you are unable to make a decent backup at least once a week, your diskspace must be considered to big. Friedrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Per Wigren [mailto:wigren@home.se] Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Juni 2002 07:37 An: vorbis@xiph.org Betreff: Re: [vorbis] When will quality increase be unnoticable? <p>Friday 21 June 2002 01.33 skrev Øyvind Stegard: >

I have Postfix/Dovecot with virtual domains, same setup unaltered since server was set up quite a while ago last month, added a new virtual domain, 'just like before'. but, today noticed this in the queue/log 'overdrawn his diskspace quota'[1]: user's Maildir cur has like 48,762,696 bytes (lot less than other users) tried some searches, found similar probs, but, no

Hi, I have two guest vm instance running CentOS 5 with ext3 partition. I will like to reduce 1 VM harddisk space and using the 'release' harddisk space to add onto my second VM. Basically I need to know how can I reduce and increase an ext3 partition in CentOS KVM. I did a search and basically i can do it by booting the VM using Knoppix and use Gparted to reduce and increase the

Looking at Puppet for a new installation. Wondering about the following capability: Say I have a reference to some definition, where I call out a relationship: silo( webservers => "server1", databaseservers => "server2" ); (sorry if syntax is incorrect). Is it possible for the definition of this to trigger "server1" to be in a "webservers"

Hi Guy, Anyone know how we can set up the vnc password during using virt-install command ? # virt-install \ --connect qemu:///system \ --name demo \ --ram 500 \ --disk path=/var/lib/libvirt/images/demo.img,size=5 \ --network network=default,model=virtio \ --vnc \ --cdrom /dev/cdrom

Alain Terriault wrote: > Just wondering if any one ever consider/use Coraid for massive storage > under CentOS? > http://www.coraid.com > It seems like a very reasonable option.. comments ? I have one of those installed on CentOS 4.6 with 1TB of storage. I'm sharing it between three servers. I can't say how well it works for multi-TB storage, but it works well enough for me

The inst/doc directory of the DAAG package has 6 files coral551.spot, ... that are around 0.85 MB each. It would be useful to be able to zip then, but that as matters stand interferes with the use of the Sweave file that uses them to demonstrate input of expression array data that is in the "spot" format. They do not automatically get unzipped when required. I have checked that

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > I would also not use XFS in production ... but that is just me. Interesting, I thought that XFS was fairly safe for use. What would you recommend for filesystems in the 50-500 terabyte range? (And yes, we do actually run a 70 TB at the moment, so I'm not asking just to annoy you; I'm genuinely