similar to: AIC in glm()

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "AIC in glm()"

2007 Mar 01
2
[LLVMdev] Version 1.9 SSA form question
int %nlz10(uint %param.x) { %.t3 = shr uint %param.x, ubyte 1 ; <uint> [#uses=1] %.t4 = or uint %.t3, %param.x ; <uint> [#uses=2] %.t7 = shr uint %.t4, ubyte 2 ; <uint> [#uses=1] %.t8 = or uint %.t7, %.t4 ; <uint> [#uses=2] %.t11 = shr uint %.t8, ubyte 4 ; <uint> [#uses=1]
2019 Jun 05
2
Strange behaviour of post-legalising optimisations(?)
I come across a situation that I am having a hard time to understand. When I compile the following code : char *tst( char *dest, const char *src, unsigned int len ) { for (int i=0 ; i<len ; i++) { dest[i] = src[i]; } return dest; } Clang generates this for the ‘for’ body: for.body: ; preds = %for.cond %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i8,
2006 Jun 27
1
Boxplot questions.
Dear all, I am having a data for 2 different treatments with different time points. So, I used the following code to plot the boxplot and also to do anova. T11 <- c(280, 336, 249, 277, 429) T12 <- c(400, 397, 285, 407, 313) T13 <- c(725, 373, 364, 706, 249) T21 <- c(589, 257, 466, 248, 913) T22 <- c(519, 424, 512, 298, 907) T23 <- c(529, 479, 634, 354, 1015) obs <- c(T11,
2000 Sep 29
2
Matrix inversion
I cannot find what is the function label for matrix inversion in R. I have found 'ginv' for the moore-penrose in the MASS package, but there is probably a simple inversion operator in the base package. Where can I find it? ____________________________________________ Yvonnick Noel, PhD. University of Lille 3 Department of Psychology F-59653 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex (+33) 320 41 63 48
2004 Jan 24
2
Re-Post: Combining Factors in model.matrix
Hello, I didn't get any response on this before, leading me to believe I've missed something fundamental. Can anybody guide me in the correct direction for more help on this? Paul ================================================= I want to be able to create a design matrix with two factors. For instance, if I have: > t1 <- factor(c(1,1,2,2)); > t2 <-
2001 Nov 09
1
Installing packages
Hello, I have upgraded from Mandrake Linux 8.0 to Mandrake 8.1 and try to reinstall my favourite R... Everything is OK for the base software but I have trouble to get some packages installed. Specifically, for some packages, a "collect2" binary seems to be necessary during the compilation/linking process of the library, and LD complains about not finding it : Installing source
2017 Oct 13
2
[SelectionDAG] Assertion due to MachineMemOperand flags difference.
Hello, I've hit an assertion in SelectionDAG where we try to merge 2 loads that have the same operands but their MMO flags differ. One is dereferenceable and one is not. I'm not sure what the underlying issue here is: 1) MDSDNode with the same operands should have the same flags set on their respective MMO. The fact the flags differ when the opcode,types,operands and address-space are
2001 Nov 05
2
Item Response Analysis
Hello, Would someone have ever heard or developed any Item Response Models library for R ? Of course, a Rasch model can be estimated through glm() but it is not the case for more complex (polytomous) response models. Similarly I would be interested in any R implementation of nonlinear multivariate analyses a la GIFI (HOMALS, PRINCALS, OVERALS). Thanks a lot in advance, Yvonnick Noel, PhD.
2016 Dec 22
2
struct bitfield regression between 3.6 and 3.9 (using -O0)
Here's our testcase: #include <stdio.h> struct flags { unsigned frog: 1; unsigned foo : 1; unsigned bar : 1; unsigned bat : 1; unsigned baz : 1; unsigned bam : 1; }; int main() { struct flags flags; flags.bar = 1; flags.foo = 1; if (flags.foo == 1) { printf("Pass\n"); return 0; } else {
2016 Dec 23
2
struct bitfield regression between 3.6 and 3.9 (using -O0)
Given that this is compiled with -O0, would there a way to skip the Optimization of the Type-legalized selection DAG? It's fine until it optimizes the Type-legalized selection DAG into the Optimized Type-legalized selection DAG. Phil On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Friedman, Eli <efriedma at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 12/21/2016 4:45 PM, Phil Tomson via llvm-dev wrote: > >
2016 Dec 22
0
struct bitfield regression between 3.6 and 3.9 (using -O0)
On 12/21/2016 4:45 PM, Phil Tomson via llvm-dev wrote: > Here's our testcase: > > #include <stdio.h> > > struct flags { > unsigned frog: 1; > unsigned foo : 1; > unsigned bar : 1; > unsigned bat : 1; > unsigned baz : 1; > unsigned bam : 1; > }; > > int main() { > struct flags flags; > flags.bar = 1; >
2002 Jul 15
1
ReInstalling packages
Hello, I just have upgraded from Mandrake 8.1 to 8.2 and installed R 1.5.1. I now try to reinstall all the packages but get the following error (for the multiv package for instance) : /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lreadline collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [multiv.so] Erreur 1 ERROR: compilation failed for package 'multiv' The readline library is under /lib on my system and I
2000 Aug 16
3
Installing ESS under EMACS
Dear members, I have spent some time to make clear how I could write R programs from within EMACS using the ESS package, under Win98. Unfortunately, I have found this not quite clear for Windows 98 (though a lot of details are provided for UNIX). I have tried to create a .emacs file with a command such as (load "PATH/ess-site.el") and also added a "PATH=...\rw1010\" line in
2018 Apr 09
1
llvm-dev Digest, Vol 166, Issue 22
Hi Krzysztof, Sure, please see below. DAG.dump.() before and after, annotated with what I believe the DAG means. I've spent some time debugging the method but it's proving difficult to determine where the logic is misfiring. Disabling the entire combine causes a lot of failing x86-64 tests - I may have to learn an upstream vector ISA to make progress on this. Thank you >From your
2011 Oct 11
0
New package announcement: R2STATS, a GUI for fitting GLM and GLMM
Dear R-users, I wanted to inform you that a new package called R2STATS is available, as a graphical front-end for the glm() and glmer() functions. The GUI is based on the RGTk2 and gWidgets packages by Michael Lawrence and John Verzani, and so requires that the GTK+ library be installed first on your system. This is done "automagically" when installing the RGtk2 package (or the
2016 Aug 02
2
Instruction selection problems due to SelectionDAGBuilder
Hello. I'm having problems at instruction selection with my back end with the following basic-block due to a vector add with immediate constant vector (obtained by vectorizing a simple C program doing vector sum map): vector.ph: ; preds = %vector.memcheck50 %.splatinsert = insertelement <8 x i64> undef, i64 %i.07.unr, i32 0
2016 Nov 03
2
rotl: undocumented LLVM instruction?
Is there any way to get it to delay this optimization where it goes from this: Initial selection DAG: BB#0 'bclr64:entry' SelectionDAG has 14 nodes: t0: ch = EntryToken t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %vreg0 t4: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %vreg1 t6: i64 = sub t4, Constant:i64<1> t7: i64 = shl Constant:i64<1>, t6
2002 Mar 12
0
MatClass
Hello, I have written a small set of R functions for doing Generative Topographic Mapping and variants, and would like to write part of the code in C++ using the MatClass Matrix Library ( http://les.man.ac.uk/ses/staff/crb/matclass/ ). Now, my problem is even before writing the code itself, to compile the MatClass library. Everything is OK under Windows but when trying to port the program to
2009 Sep 29
1
How to parsing data like this in R
Hi, R-users, I met a problem: Items:[Anna 'moi =) akku loppu joskus 4ltä. Kestää kauan nää..'\tAmer, Tuusula (0:20)\t20\t12\t16\t00\t00\t11]/Anne 'Ei jakoa,uus päivä muistio et 4n niin peruin. Hups'\t (0:16)\t0\t12\t18\t00\t00\t11/Elina 'Konsertissa. En tod. vastaa teille'\tEtu-Töölö, Helsinki (2:40)\t24\t12\t18\t00\t00\t11 I want to parsing the above data into the
2016 Nov 03
3
rotl: undocumented LLVM instruction?
Setting the ISD::ROTL to Expand doesn't work? (via SetOperation) You could also do a Custom hook if that's what you're looking for. On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Phil Tomson <phil.a.tomson at gmail.com> wrote: > ... or perhaps to rephrase: > > In 3.9 it seems to be doing a smaller combine much sooner, whereas in 3.6 > it deferred that till later in the