similar to: HLM in R

> On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Magill, Brett wrote: > > > Does anyone know of code to conduct hierarchical (that is, multi-level) > > models using R. Beyond simply requiring a nested design, I want to model > > explicitly the covariance between levels as is done in such multi-level > > modeling software as HLM or MLwin and discussed in Goldestein (1999) > > The lme()

Hi R users! I am trying to learn some multilevel analysis, but unfortunately i am now very confused. The reason: http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/hlm/seminars/hlm_mlm/mlm_hlm_seminar.htm http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/sas/seminars/sas_mlm/mlm_sas_seminar.htm and MlmSoftRev. pdf from mlmRev package. >From what i see, the first two links seem to declare the level one variable as a random part (i

When playing around fitting unconditional growth models using R and MlwiN today, I produced two different sets of estimates that I can't reconcile and wondered if anyone here has an idea: The data is two-level repeated measures data with measures nested within child. There are two measures per child. I've fit an unconditional growth model as in Singer and Willet (2003) that allows for

I am making a little GUI for lme4, and I was wondering if there is a function that automatically detects on which level every variable exists. Furtheremore I got kind of confused about what a random effects model actually calculates. I have some experience with commercial software packages for multilevel analysis, like HLM6, and I was surprised that lme4 does not require the user to specify the

Using ranef() (package nlme, version 3.1-75) with an 'lme' object I can obtain random effects for intercept and slope of a certain level (say: 1) - this corresponds to (say level 1) "residuals" in MLWin. Maybe I'm mistaken here, but the results are identical. However, if I try to get the standardized random effects adding the paramter "standard=T" to the

Dear R-users, I'm running a lmer model using the lme4 package. My dependent variable is dichotomous and I'm using the "binomial" family. The results are slightly different from the HLM results based on a Bernoulli distribution. I read that a Bernoulli distribution is an extension of a binomial distribution. Is that right? If so, how can I adapt my R model to a Bernoulli

I'm hoping that this is a relatively easy question for someone familiar with the lme4 package. I'm accustomed to using HLM software and writing a simple 2 level [null] equation like this: L1 - Yij = b0 + e L2 - b0 = B00 + u0 The following command in R provides results that are identical to the HLM program. results <- lmer( Y ~ 1 |id , PanelData4) I can't

Hello everyone, Can someone point me to some resources on managing data in R and/or S-plus? I have started using R more and more often in my work and I really like it. But, managing data is very different in R and S-Plus than in other packages that I am accustomed to. I know that it is an option to use different workspaces for different projects or to store all objects as source and read them

Hi, I compare results of a simple two-level poisson estimated using lmer and those estimated using MLwiN and Stata (v.9). In R, I trype: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- m2 <- lmer(.D ~ offset(log(.Y)) + (1|pcid2) + educy + agri, male, poisson) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A while ago I asked about data management approaches in R. I was asked by several people to post a summary of the responses and alas I am just getting around to doing it. I received several comments, both on and off list. Below is a compilation of these responses. Hope this is as helpful to others as it was to me. Best, Brett 1. Frank Harrell recommended a section, "Operating in

If you don't get a response it is because you did not read the Posting Guide which indicates that the R-sig-ME mailing list is where this question would have been on-topic. -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On August 16, 2017 6:17:03 AM PDT, b88207001 at ntu.edu.tw wrote: >Hello dear uesRs, > >I am working on modeling both level one and level two

A better place for this post would be on R's mixed models list: r-sig-mixed-models . Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:17 AM, <b88207001 at ntu.edu.tw> wrote: > Hello dear

Dear R listers, I know I'm breaking the rules by asking a "homework" related question-- I hope you'll forgive me. I am a social psychology graduate student, and the only one in my department who uses R. I successfully completed my multiple regression and structural equation modeling courses using R (John Fox's car and sem packages were a big help, as was his book).

Insightful has some nice docs available for download that are s-plus command line guides to statistics. There are two versions, one for S-plus 2000 and one for S-plus 6.0. With regard to syntax, is one a closer match to R than the other? Are they based on the same S engines? Does that matter? I know there will be differences in any case, I am just trying to decide wich version I want to

Hi I am trying to convert SAS codes to R, but some of the result are quite different from SAS. When I ran proc mixed, I have an option ddfm=bw followed by the model. How can I show this method in R?(I am thinking that this maybe the reason that I can't get the similar results) below is my SAS codes: proc mixed data=test covtest empirical; class pair grade team school; model score = trt

Hello dear uesRs, I am working on modeling both level one and level two heteroscedasticity in HLM. In my model, both error variance and variance of random intercept / random slope are affected by some level two variables. I found that nlme is able to model heteroscedasticity. I learned how to use it for level one heteroscedasticity but don't know how to use it to model the level

Hello, I'm running a simulation study of a multilevel model with binary response using the binomial probit link. It is a random intercept and random slope model. GLMMPQL and lmer fail to converge on a *significant* portion of the *generated* datasets, while MlWin gives reasonable estimates on those datasets. This is unacceptable. Does anyone has similar experiences? Regards, Roel de

Dear R experts, I had a question which may not be directly relevant to R but I will be grateful if you can give me some advices. I ran a two-level multilevel model for data with repeated measurements over time, i.e. level-1 the repeated measures and level-2 subjects. I could not get convergence using lme(), so I tried MLwiN, which eventually showed the level-2 variances (random effects for

Hello, ? I believe that in R, it is not possible to analyze mixed effect-models when the distribucion is not gaussian (p.e. binomial or poisson), isn't? ? Somebody can suggest me alternative? ? thanks ? xavi ? -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info",

Hello, how do I obtain standard errors of variances and covariances of the random effects with LME comparable to those of for example MlWin? I know you shouldn't use them because the distribution of the estimator isn't symmetric blablabla, but I need a measure of the variance of those estimates for pooling my multiple imputation results. Regards, Roel.