similar to: running non-base functions

On Fri 2015-05-22 00:06:29 -0400, Darren Tucker wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Matthew Vernon <matthew at debian.org> wrote: >> >> You will be aware of https://weakdh.org/ by now, I presume; the >> take-home seems to be that 1024-bit DH primes might well be too weak. >> I'm wondering what (if anything!) you propose to do about this issue, >>

Hi all, I am trying to build a cross compiler for Sparc on x386 host. I tried to run configure with configure --enable-targets=sparc or with configure --target=sparc but in both cases I got llvm compiler for x86 target. Is there a way to build a cross compiler for Sparc (or ARM)? Thanks. -- Fima Rabin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Thanks for your advice. I am not sure that I understood your comment "If you need something, there should be a __builtin that corresponds to the intrinsic." Is that a better way to define an intrinsic function in C? How do you do it? I am actually trying to add several intrinsic functions for my target machine so I am looking for a simple and workable way of doing it. Thanks again.

On Dec 29, 2009, at 5:50 AM, fima rabin wrote: > I am trying to compile this little C-program: > ================= > typedef double v2f64 __attribute__((ext_vector_type(2))); > > int sse2_cmp_sd(v2f64, v2f64, char ) asm("llvm.x86.sse2.cmp.sd"); We used to support this, but there are problems with it. I actually just went to go implement this again, which

On Tue 2015-05-26 12:57:05 -0400, Hubert Kario wrote: > creating composites that will pass even 100000 rounds of Miller-Rabin is > relatively simple.... > (assuming the values for M-R tests are picked randomly) Can you point me to the algorithms for doing that? This would suggest that we really do want primality proofs (and a good way to verify them). Do those algorithms hold for

On Jan 6, 2010, at 1:12 PM, fima rabin wrote: > I am trying to compile a little intrinsic function for my machine. Here is a dump from clang-cc with --emit-llvm option: > ===================== > > ; ModuleID = 'foo.c' > target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-f32:32:32-f64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-f80:32:32" >

May I use "searchpaths()" with arguments partially matching file names that are found in different directories ? My question is whether this is th R function equivalent of Linux "find" or Windows "search". Both O.S. calls are given a starting point so that they search all diectories from then downwards looking for files whose names match the searching criteria.

On Tue 2015-05-26 14:02:07 -0400, Hubert Kario wrote: > On Tuesday 26 May 2015 13:43:13 Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> On Tue 2015-05-26 12:57:05 -0400, Hubert Kario wrote: >> > creating composites that will pass even 100000 rounds of Miller-Rabin is >> > relatively simple.... >> > (assuming the values for M-R tests are picked randomly) >> >> Can you

On OpenBSD we still use the "classic" SunOS 4 shared library versioning scheme where the major and minor number are part of the library name (and recorded in DT_NEEDED entries). For example the shared libc on the OpenBSD-current is named libc.so.89.2. With this scheme, linker has to pick the pick the library with the highest major and minor (within the highest major version); the

"An Introduction to R", Venables and Smith, Version 1.6.2 (2003-01-10) http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-intro.pdf has in its "Appendix A: A sample session", page 81, file.show("morley.tab") I get the response NO FILE morley.tab The following "Introduction to the R Project for Statistical Computing" www.itc.nl/~rossiter/teach/sstat14/

I am trying to compile this little C-program: ================= typedef double v2f64 __attribute__((ext_vector_type(2))); int sse2_cmp_sd(v2f64, v2f64, char ) asm("llvm.x86.sse2.cmp.sd"); int main() { static int i; static float x[10]; static float y[10]; v2f64 m1; v2f64 m2; int j; i = sse2_cmp_sd(m1,m2,'z'); ========================== I expected to

Hi Mark, If we have to do this, or LLD doesn't work on OpenBSD, I think we need to do this. But can I ask one question? I wonder why OpenBSD systems don't have symbolic links unlike the other Unix-like systems in the first place. On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Mark Kettenis via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On OpenBSD we still use the "classic"

I am trying to compile a little intrinsic function for my machine. Here is a dump from clang-cc with --emit-llvm option: ===================== ; ModuleID = 'foo.c' target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-f32:32:32-f64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-f80:32:32" target triple = "i386-pc-linux-gnu" @main.i = internal global i32

library() seems to remember the location of a package when I give it a lib.loc, and then use that version thereafter, even if I don't supply lib.loc again. Is there any way I can load different versions of a package in one R session? -- I don't seem to able to simply detach the package and then load a different version from a different library location. $ R [...startup info...] >

I want to report the progress of my attempts to get R running on HP-UX with gcc: Firstly, I could work around the PIC problem by leaving out all the lib stuff (I rebuilt gcc with --enable-share, but this (alone) did not help), e.g. the line gcc -shared -fPIC -o ctest.sl ansari.o fexact.o kendall.o ks.o prho.o swilk.o -L/usr/local/lib -lg2c -lm -L/lib/pa1.1 -L/usr/lib/pa1.1 -u main

Dear Dr. Sarkar, When I try to run the codes, I found the following problem: > h<- sample(1:14, 319, rep=T) > c<- sample(1:14, 608, rep=T) > n<- sample(1:14, 1140, rep=T) > vt<-c(h, c, n) > ta<-rep(c("h", "c", "n"), c(319, 608, 1140)) > > to<-data.frame(vt,ta) > library(lattice) Attaching package: 'lattice'

Hello, I had to set CPPFLAGS and FC=fort77 but configure saw atlas and used it instead of blas. However atlas for hp seems to missing some libs. I had to add -lblas in Makeconf. Everything builds ok. But modreg and tcltk doesn't load. R : Copyright 2000, The R Development Core Team Version 1.2.0 Under development (unstable) (2000-August-9) R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO

Hi, I'm not sure what the recommended thing to do here would be: In the lattice library, panel.loess needs to use loess.smooth(), which is in the modreg library. Now should I (1) make lattice depend on modreg, and call require(modreg) in zzz.R OR (2) use autoload("loess", "modreg") I like the second option better, as a particular session might not need panel.loess.

Hello, I just pulled the patched release: R-release Version 1.0.0 Patched (March 19, 2000), on HPUX10.2 I am having dynamic library load problems. I configured with: ./configure --prefix=/home/absd00t/local --with-readline --with-x After changing etc/Makeconf to take -lblas out of libs (the blas library provided by the system is not a shared library), system was built without any interruptions.

I am running linuxppc 2.1.128 on a pmac 8500/200 604e. R 0.63 builds and installs without errors. The compiler is egcs 102 pre and binutils 2.9.1.0.15. When attempting to load modreg with the library command the following error is returned. Error in dyn.load(file) : unable to load shared library "/usr/local/share/R/library/modreg/libs/modreg.so" How can I debug this problem?