similar to: simulation from a bivariate normal distribution

I'm a very recent user of R. I have been adapting my Splus programmes and I found only one (important) problem. There exists no function "nlmin" in R and its substitute, "nlm", does not work well with my kind of problems, sometimes no achieving convergence, other tines "converging" to impossible values. My models are highly nonlinear and are to be estimated by

Hi, is there a way of simplifying the following code: G <- rep(NA,n) for(i in 1:n) { gj <- 0 for(j in 1:n) { for(l in 1:n) { for(m in 1:n) { gj <- gj+G.fun(XB[i]+p[3]*X[j,3]+p[4]*X[l,4]+p[5]*X[m,5],ff) } } } G[i] <- gj/n^3 } Thanks. Joaquim Santos

Hi, I created several figures and their titles should appear like this: Figure 1: Monte Carlo results for alternative estimators of structural parameters (N = 100, T = 5) Because N and T change across figures, my code includes the following lines: N.set <- 100 T.set <- 5 mtext(“Figure 1: Monte Carlo results for alternative estimators of structural

On 28/02/14 11:43, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 28/02/2014 11:41, Joaquim Barrera ha scritto: >>> >> >> Thanks for the answer. Something is still not clear to me. Are we in >> front of a bug (that means, something that could be fixed) or is this >> behaviour somehow expected for some reason? More and more tests I am >> doing, I get allways the same throughput

On 24/02/14 23:26, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Thanks for raising this. >> >> I noticed that mirror_run() does not throttle the first loop where it >> populates the dirty bitmap using bdrv_is_allocated_above(). > This is on purpose. Does it causes a noticeable stall in the guest? > >> The main >> copy loop does take the speed limit into account but perhaps

Hi List,   I’ m analysing the selectivity of resting site use by forest carnivores through mixed modelling techniques and I wonder which will be the best r package to deal with several aspects simultaneously: -          binomial variable response; -          possible spatial and/or temporal correlation; I have tried nlme (lme function) and lme4 (lmer function) packages, however I realize that the

Hello everybody! /(First I need to apologize becase I mussunderstood the prupose of libvirt-list and I sent this mail there instead of this list)/ I would like to introduce myself, as this is my first contact with libvirt mailing list (although I've been reading quite a lot of documentation). My name is Joaquim Barrera, from Barcelona, Catalonia. I am a computer engineer and recently I

Excellent, thanks! --paulr From: James Y Knight [mailto:jyknight at google.com] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 12:00 PM To: Robinson, Paul Cc: Mikhail Ramalho; vedant_kumar at apple.com; llvm-dev Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] 'git llvm push' not working for me on Windows Aha! From your output I figured out what I screwed up. Sorry about the trouble... Illustration of the issue: svn

Poking around in the .git\llvm-upstream-svn tree, I find that llvm\trunk\test\DebugInfo\Generic is empty, as are all the other subdirectories of test\DebugInfo that I tried. I have other files in the checkin that are in leaf directories but those files all exist. I hacked git-llvm to add a –verbose option: `git apply --verbose -p2 -` returned 1 Checking patch

The usual workaround is to do `rm –rf .git/llvm-upstream-svn` and try again. You could also patch llvm/utils/git-svn/git-llvm to add the `--verbose` option to the `git apply` command, which would provide better diagnostic output. HTH, --paulr From: Petr Hosek [mailto:phosek at chromium.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 10:52 PM To: Robinson, Paul Cc: James Y Knight; llvm-dev; vedant_kumar at

OK, I've managed to do it: I was trying to push it from a build/ directory, maybe that's why the git apply was failing. Pushing the commit from the root of the repo worked. Em qua, 28 de nov de 2018 às 16:40, Mikhail Ramalho < mikhail.ramalho at gmail.com> escreveu: > Hi, > > The patch only changes one file in clang. Here's the patch: >

On 16/12/13 11:19, Ján Tomko wrote: > On 12/16/2013 11:00 AM, Joaquim Barrera wrote: >> After make finishes I have compiled 1.2.0 libvirt in the source tree, and if I >> execute 'sudo ./run tools/virsh version' I get a this answer: >> >> /Compiled against library: libvirt 1.2.0// >> //Using library: libvirt 1.2.0// >> //Using API: QEMU 1.2.0//

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, 14:32 Paulo Matos <pmatos at linki.tools wrote: > > > On 12 February 2019 18:59:21 CET, Mikhail Ramalho < > mikhail.ramalho at gmail.com> wrote: > >I _think_ there is a problem with the license as well: Z3 is MIT, so > >clang > >would have to be released with Z3's license. > > I don't think that's a problem. You are not

On 12/16/2013 08:53 AM, Joaquim Barrera wrote: [please don't top-post on technical lists] > Excuse me for the duplicate anwer but I observed exactly what I was > telling you. I execute "sudo ./run tools/virsh" and then: If you are running virsh as sudo, then you must remember that virsh is running under root, not you. > > 'connect

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:58:56AM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 14.02.2014 10:40, Joaquim Barrera wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > As I am doing some tests with qemu, I realized that the way it does > > 'migrate -i tcp:DEST:444' is not the same as 'libvirt migrate > > --copy-storage-inc'. Basically qemu uses the same stream as RAM > >

We are currently implementing the backends for other solvers (you can follow the progress here: https://github.com/mikhailramalho/clang). So far we got Boolector, MathSAT and Yices ready. CVC4 should be done soon. When used to refute bugs, they all give roughly the same results: a ~5% speedup if there are refuted bugs or a ~5% slowdown if no bug is refuted. I've only tried to analyze one

Hi all, This is probably a very simple question but I cannot figure out how to do it. I run the fourthcorner method with my data and would like to adjust the p values for multiple comparisons using Holm correction. When I run the fourthcorner I obtain the results in yellow. What do I need to do to be able to aply the Holm correction to those p values? > library(ade4) > four1 <-

Can you please run "git llvm --verbose push" and send me the output? BTW, I've just committed a fix for the handling of binary patch data when you're running it under python3.X. I don't believe that was a regression from my recent changes, but if you're using python3, you could see if that fixes it for you. On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 7:20 PM Mikhail Ramalho via llvm-dev

Hi all, I suppose this is a very simple question, but as I've lost already a bit of time with it, without being able to get what I wanted, I'm addressing the question to the group in the hope someone can help me. I pretend to plot the richness of herbaceous species (RichHN) as a function of time since remnant isolation (Isol) conditioned to the area of the remnant (fArea - this is a

Hi again, On Dec 13, 2010, at 18:03, James Molloy wrote: > To add to what Anton said, what if you're on a non-x86 target, or --no-frame-pointer is set? for the moment we're only considering X86-64 targets and we're forcing the FP to be materialized (ie, -disable-fp-elim) to ensure we can be independent of what happens to SP. btw, I can't think of any current ISA/ABI which