similar to: A simple question??

It's getting more and more annoying to have separate plugin directories for lda, pop3 and imap. Currently all the plugins are installed into $lib/dovecot/ and then symlinked to the lda, pop3, imap directories. The original reason was that v0.99 just loaded everything in those directories since there was no mail_plugins setting. But then there are things like expire-tool and convert-tool (and

I used to use a hot-plugable PATA-CDROM drive on my Computer (Samsung P35 laptop). To change drive I use a script which at the bottom of its heart uses Code: echo "scsi remove-single-device 1 0 0 0" | sudo tee /proc/scsi/scsi and Code: echo "scsi add-single-device 1 0 0 0" | sudo tee /proc/scsi/scsi commands in oder to let the OS being aware of the changed drive. This

v0.99 will be next, having the new great binary tree code which should make huge mailboxes possible. With smaller mailboxes I think it still makes it better than the old code, even while it is slower in some cases (hash lookups are faster than btree search in optimal cases). v0.98.4 2002-10-06 Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> * Just a final release before replacing hash file with a binary

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta16.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta16.tar.gz.sig If all goes well, I'll release v1.1.rc1 in a couple of days. Now's a good time to start testing v1.1 :) Changes since beta15: - Squat is finally working and supports expunging messages from it. I've been stress testing it and can't find any problems

Hi all, I have inherited an old Dovecot installation which is causing headaches almost every day. I know that one of the rules says "Don't bother asking questions about v0.99.x versions. They're no longer supported."...but please bear with me, this will be quick as I only need some advise from experienced Dovecot gurus out there. I have read the Dovecot documentation and there

On 09/14/2017 10:31 PM, Daniel Neilson wrote: > > >> On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:30 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov >> <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: >> >> >> On 09/14/2017 10:43 AM, Daniel Neilson wrote: >>> Thank you for your thoughts, Hal. More information below... >>> >>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 5:43 PM, Hal Finkel

Thank you for your thoughts, Hal. More information below... On Sep 13, 2017, at 5:43 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov<mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: On 09/13/2017 01:01 PM, Daniel Neilson via llvm-dev wrote: … snip For example, the following IR will produce different sets of IV users if either: i) The order of the PHI nodes in the %loop block are reordered; or ii) The

On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:30 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov<mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: On 09/14/2017 10:43 AM, Daniel Neilson wrote: Thank you for your thoughts, Hal. More information below... On Sep 13, 2017, at 5:43 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov<mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: On 09/13/2017 01:01 PM, Daniel Neilson via llvm-dev wrote: … snip For

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 07/04/2017 01:41 AM, Dr.-Ing. Christoph Cullmann via llvm-dev wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Hi Alexandre, >>> >>> LLVM currently doesn't have trunc nsw/nuw, no. >>> Which frontend would emit such instructions? Any application in mind?

Hi all, I’ve most recently been grappling with a difficult to reproduce bug. I’ve traced the source of the difficulty in reproduction to the IVUsers analysis pass that is used by Loop Strength Reduction. Specifically, the IVUsers pass’s output is very sensitive to both the use list ordering of the instructions that it is looking at and the ordering of the Phi nodes in the header block of the loop

I have a confusing problem with getting the form `x - trunc(x)' to be exactly zero when `x' is an integer. It only seems to occur inside of a function. [R-1.6.0 on Linux/Intel] I have a function to return the highest precision digit of values in `x': prec<-function(x){ init <- trunc(log10(max(x))) y <- x - trunc(x) while (any(y > 0)) { init <- init - 1 x1

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Rackover, Zvi <zvi.rackover at intel.com> wrote: > Hi Sanjay, > > > > I agree we should also discuss **if** this canonicalization is beneficial. > > For starters, do we have a concrete case where we would benefit from > canonicalizing shuffles <-> truncates in LLVM IR? > > IMO, we should not count benefits for codegen

Hi, > Hi Alexandre, > > LLVM currently doesn't have trunc nsw/nuw, no. > Which frontend would emit such instructions? Any application in mind? > Just asking because if no frontend could emit those, then the motivation to > add nsw/nuw support to trunc would be very low I guess. I think the clang frontend could use that to allow better static analysis of integer overflows on

I am compiling the following code for the MIPS architecture: unsigned char trunc(float f) { return (unsigned char) f; } and it produces the following assembly (directives removed for convenience: trunc: trunc.w.s $f0, $f12 mfc1 $2, $f0 jr $ra nop However, this does not seem to produce the correct output for negative numbers. When I run the following code, I get

Hello, >From [1], trunc does not seems to have a nsw/nuw attribute. Is it possible to have that? Or do we have that and it is not up-to-date? The definition would be: If the nuw keyword is present, the result value of the trunc is a poison value if the truncated high order bits are non-zero. If the nsw keyword is present, the result value of the trunc is a poison value if the truncated high

According to 6.3.1.3/3 of the C standard (I didn't check C++): "3 Otherwise, the new type is signed and the value cannot be represented in it; either the result is implementation-defined or an implementation-defined signal is raised." I *think* that means that IF a signal is raised then the signal raised could be one that you can't guarantee to be able to return from

On 07/05/2017 03:10 PM, Alexandre Isoard wrote: > Ah, ok. I read it wrong. In *neither* case it is UB. > > Hum, can an implementation define it as UB? :-) Nope :-) The only case I've thought of where we could add these for C++ would be on conversions to (most) enums (because they used signed underlying types and the out-of-bounds mapping won't generally be one of the allowed

Technically, there is a round() for 'Date' objects, but it doesn't seem very useful, because it basically just fall back to the default round() method, which only takes the 'digits' argument. Here's an example: > date <- Sys.Date() > class(date) [1] "Date" We see that there are only two round() methods in addition to the implicit built-in one; >

?s 14:36 de 08/02/2024, Olivier Benz via R-devel escreveu: >> On 8 Feb 2024, at 15:15, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >> >>>>>>> Ji?? Moravec >>>>>>> on Wed, 7 Feb 2024 10:23:15 +1300 writes: >> >>> This is my first time working with dates, so if the answer is "Duh, work >>> with

I forgot to mention, that I use LLVM release 2.8, I did not try it with the latest revision, but I expect that I am rather doing something wrong than using non-implemented functions. On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:09:57 +0100, ihusar <ihusar at fit.vutbr.cz> wrote: > Hello, > > i need to fold constants, i found that a function ConstantFoldConstantExpression could be used, > however