similar to: f2c question

Hello, I take it all back. I just tried to comple 0.90.1 on my alpha (with f2c) and it didn't work. I'll look into it when I find time (I STILL usually run on my libretto and linux, even through my RS6000 workstation). Jonathan Jonathan Yuen, Professor in Plant Pathology phone: 46 18 672369 Dept. of Ecology and Crop Production Sciences fax: 46 18 672890 Swedish University of

Hello, This is perhaps a little off-topic, but I am curious as to what compilers people use to compile R (under unix/linux). I am primarily interested in the use of egcs or gcc, g77 or f2c, etc. It seems most of the gcc interest and development is towards egcs, and while a gcc 2.8.1/g77 combination did work and compile R on my primary linux machine, it also managed to produce kernels that did

Greetings. I'm trying to install R-0.90.1 on our digital 4.0F servers (alphaev6 arch). Using either the digital cc and f77, or gcc 2.95.2 and g77, R compiles, but on trying to execute it I get: 11819:./bin/R.X11: /sbin/loader: Fatal Error: cannot map xxxxxxx I'm used to 'cannot map', but always with a shared library name, not 'xxxxxxx'. Has anyone else run into this

Hello, With regards to Peter's comment, I got R to compile on OSF 4.0C, though I'm a little behind on versions. I only have 0.63.3 and haven't found anything newer... All kidding regarding typos aside, I went through that floating point exception business on the Alpha and I just didn't have time to make it work. Someone tipped me on to f2c, which I had used with my (old gcc

Hello, I have compiled 0.62.4 under Linux and it runs fine (a gcc/g77 combination). When I try the same thing under AIX (4.1.5) or under dec's OSF (both also gcc/g77) I get problems. Under AIX, system.c complains: system.c: In function `waitForActivity': system.c:150: `fd_set' undeclared (first use in this function) system.c:150: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once

I have been reading the archives of this list and noticed a post from Murray Jorgensen asking about how to install R under slackware. The replies were all to the effect that he should compile from the source. There is another path that is better for some purposes. Download the red hat binary package, the .rpm file, then run rpm2targz on it, a slackware program designed to convert rpm packages

Hello All, It appears that something is still not right with my linux systems. I can compile R (ie make and make install) but make check fails. It appears that the getwd and setwd functions don't work -- getwd returns gibberish. Thus I can run the graphics demo until it tries to read in the iris data. I'll admit I've done maybe too much to these systems to be able to get R to

Greetings, I am trying to install R (0.63.2) on a Digital Unix 4.0b Alpha Server 2100A using gcc 2.8.1 and f77 v 0.5.2.3. It seems to compile OK. However, when I try to run R I get the following message: R : Copyright 1999, The R Development Core Team Version 0.63.2 (January 12, 1999) R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under

howdy R friends, Can anyone help me with converting a ''unix'' date (seconds since 1970) into something readable? There doesn''t seem to be anything in the ''date'' package and the prospect of calculating this myself doesn''t excite me. thanks, John Strumila -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help

Hello All, I have used that DCW data at PSU before, and one option (at that time) was to download ascii files with the lat/lon point pairs for each of the polygons for each country. The format was fairly easy to read (into SAS). I just looked at the page again but I was unable to download the ascii files. I don't know if this is a 'temporary' bug or a feature. You should also know

Hello, Does anyone know where I might BEGIN to look for the reason why the documentation for R doesn't 'produced' properly on my linux machines? The binary is made and seems to run (the demos work), but I don't get any help pages (ie I get nothing when I type ?contributors). If I repeatedly run the 'build-help' command in the bin directory, it will take up where it broke

Hello, I managed to solve the problem myself. After fooling around with the machine(s) last night I discovered that either my groff (1.09) is either 'broken' or too old. This is on a 'homemade' linux machine and the groff was from 1994. After updating to groff 1.11 the docs came out just fine!! Jonathan Yuen phone: 46 18 672369 Swedish

Hi all, The systems guys here in the stat dept don't seem to be able to compile R on the Dec Alphas or on the SGIs. Can anyone give them a hand? -Greg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gregory R. Warnes | It is high time that the ideal of success warnes at biostat.washington.edu | be replaced by the ideal of service.

Thanks a lot to Demitris for a prompt answer some minutes ago on another tread (see below). To avoid excess mails on the list, I move onto next question: I have another small plotting problem that confuses me. I want to plot results from a field trial series, using the numbers of the trials as symbols in the plot. pch = as.character(trial_no) works fine, but truncates the trial number to the

Hello all, R2.1.1, W2k I try to make a plot of a simple regression model in this way: > with(njfA_bcd, { + plot(TC_OS.G31,Prot,cex = 2, col = "red", xlab= "TC/OS at GS32", + ylab="Grain crude protein (CP)") + }) This part works well and produces the datapoints as red circles. When I try to add a line, using a fitted linear model in a way that works perfect

When trying to build R-1.1.0, the configure script reported no Fortran compiler, even though '/usr/bin/f2c' was present, and R-1.0.1 had found and successfully used this. I traced this to an apparent typo in line 2067 of configure: for name in g77 fort77 f77 f90 xlf cf77 fc; do changing this to: for name in g77 fort77 f77 f90 xlf cf77 f2c; do allowed the script to 'find'

Last Friday my computer monitor was messed up by on-line patches update. I had to reinstall everything from the o.s. and all applications on top of it. I have downloaded R source from the official site. I have uncompressed the archive and ran the configure as root in /usr/local/bin. The configuration procedure dies writing: *configure: error: Neither an F77 compiler nor f2c found * but actually

> To: Jonathan.Yuen at tvs.slu.se > Cc: "G.Janacek" <G.Janacek at uea.ac.uk>, r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch > Subject: Re: [R] Installing on DEC 4.0b > From: Peter Dalgaard BSA <p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk> > Date: 12 Feb 1999 13:25:18 +0100 > > Jonathan.Yuen at tvs.slu.se writes: > > > I don't know how well it is documented, but you need gnu

I am beginning a much-delayed update of odesolve to include several ordinary differential equation solvers from the Livermore package ODEPACK. These are much-used and reliable Fortran codes, and I plan (as I did for lsoda in the current odesolve package) to make as few changes as possible to the Fortran 77 code. However, recently someone wanted to make nested calls to lsoda, which will not work,

Does anyone have a need to use f2c rather than a Fortran compiler to build R? It is yet one more thing to test, and as it only works on 32-bit platforms it is something that I will shortly no longer be able to test. -- Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865