similar to: R-help Digest V1 #34

I have two supposedly identical installations, one under Windows 95, and the other (at home) under Windows 98. The puzzle is that under my Windows 98 installation, symbols plotted by default or with pch come out huge, at about 2.2 times the height of the axis labels. Setting cex=0.5 seems about what is needed to fix the heights. On the Windows 95 installation, the symbols come out just a little

I have two supposedly identical installations, one under Windows 95, and the other (at home) under Windows 98. The puzzle is that under my Windows 98 installation, symbols plotted by default or with pch come out huge, at about 2.2 times the height of the axis labels. Setting cex=0.5 seems about what is needed to fix the heights. On the Windows 95 installation, the symbols come out just a little

The following code demonstrates an annoyance with plot.lm(): library(DAAGxtras) x11(width=3.75, height=4) nihills.lm <- lm(log(time) ~ log(dist) + log(climb), data = nihills) plot(nihills.lm, which=5) OR try the following xy <- data.frame(x=c(3,1:5), y=c(-2, 1:5)) plot(lm(y ~ x, data=xy), which=5) The "Cook's distance" text overplots the label for the point with the

I have recently converted from S-Plus (Dec Alpha) to R (Mandrake 10.0). The differences are subtle but in some cases not easily converted. My Splus Command plotting deck was over 1200 lines and R has simplified this down to 900 lines so far. I do a lot of mapping with polygons and I am trying to figure out how to increase the default size of the fill boxes in the legend call. Splus had a

R-devel Digest Monday, September 24 2001 Volume 01 : Number 314 In this issue: [Rd] R 1.3.1 fails 'make check' on arm in the Bessel example (PR#1097) [Rd] Bug list summary (automatic post) [Rd] (PR#1089) Can be closed See the end of the digest for information about r-devel-digest ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 21

I am sorry about the problem caused by my first attempt at reporting a bug. This is a followup to my report PR#225, hopefully being more useful. By not I have a better understanding of the problems being reported. I wish to report one bug relating to plot character and to mention two other possible bugs (these may relate to differences between R and S) I have noticed with R. We have recently

================================================= This is an automated summary of the status of the R-bugs repository. Note that this may be neither complete nor perfectly correct at any given instance: Not all bugs are reported, and some reported bugs may have been fixed, but the repository not yet updated. Some bug fixes are difficult to verify because they pertain to specific hardware or

================================================= This is an automated summary of the status of the R-bugs repository. Note that this may be neither complete nor perfectly correct at any given instance: Not all bugs are reported, and some reported bugs may have been fixed, but the repository not yet updated. Some bug fixes are difficult to verify because they pertain to specific hardware or

================================================= This is an automated summary of the status of the R-bugs repository. Note that this may be neither complete nor perfectly correct at any given instance: Not all bugs are reported, and some reported bugs may have been fixed, but the repository not yet updated. Some bug fixes are difficult to verify because they pertain to specific hardware or

Full_Name: John Maindonald Version: R-2.8.1 OS: MacOS X 10.5.6 Submission from: (NULL) (203.173.3.75) The following code demonstrates an annoyance with plot.lm(): library(DAAGxtras) x11(width=3.75, height=4) nihills.lm <- lm(log(time) ~ log(dist) + log(climb), data = nihills) plot(nihills.lm, which=5) OR try the following xy <- data.frame(x=c(3,1:5), y=c(-2, 1:5)) plot(lm(y ~ x,

Depending on the setting of par()$usr, the 'at' setting in mtext(.., adj=0, outer=T) may cause the text to appear in an anomalous position (e. g. in the first instance below, at the left of the plot region rather than at 'at=0' in the figure region), or the text may not appear at all. If one does not set the 'at' parameter the text appears (with 'adj=0') on the

================================================= This is an automated summary of the status of the R-bugs repository. Note that this may be neither complete nor perfectly correct at any given instance: Not all bugs are reported, and some reported bugs may have been fixed, but the repository not yet updated. Some bug fixes are difficult to verify because they pertain to specific hardware or

================================================= This is an automated summary of the status of the R-bugs repository. Note that this may be neither complete nor perfectly correct at any given instance: Not all bugs are reported, and some reported bugs may have been fixed, but the repository not yet updated. Some bug fixes are difficult to verify because they pertain to specific hardware or

On my home (Windows 98) machine I find: > par()$cra [1] 42 16 > par()$csi [1] 0.1666667 > On my work machine I believe I had par()$cra [1] 17 16 So it looks as though R is reading the width wrongly, and that it is the width that is somehow used to determine the plot character size. Incidentally I noted Brian's comment that R had misread his character dimension information wrongly.

I am generating an array of similar plots using the par(mfrow=c(3,3)) method. Everything works fine except the plot only puts y-axis tick marks on cells in column one and x-axis tick marks on cells in row three. I would like tick marks on both the x and y axix of all 9 plots in my array. I am generating plots using the following two functions three.by.three.plot <- function(ss) {

Estimando Javier Villacampa González Yo guardo las gráficas en un archivo, no las copio. Javier Marcuzzi -----Original Message----- From: Javier Villacampa González Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 12:43 PM To: R ayuda Subject: [R-es] Problema con el tamaño de las letras en R en gráficos multiples Hola buenas, Actualmente me hayo haciendo unas gráficas que han de tener un tamaño de letra

I propose the following small changes to pairs.default. The point is to allow control of the outer margin settings, so that there is for example room for legends. [Note also the issue re the setting of par()$usr on exit] ---------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Replace function (x, labels, panel = points, main = NULL, font.main = par("font.main"),

Hola buenas, Actualmente me hayo haciendo unas gráficas que han de tener un tamaño de letra determinado. Para ello empleo los parametros ps de las funciones x11() y en par(). Mientras hago gráficas de uno y gráficas de dos plots todo va bien. Pego las gráficas en power point y veo que las gráficas son del tamaño recomendado (pego una caja de texto y compruebo que todo es correcto de manera

A while ago there was a thread on graphics. I complained that the plots produced by dev.print had symbols and fonts that were too small. I said I had been using par(cex=2), but the advice was to use pointsize. I have tried ps, is that what was meant? par(ps=40) x<-rnorm(100) y<-rnorm(100) dev.print(file="~/junk.ps", horizontal=FALSE) No matter how big I make ps (40,60...), the

Is there an equivalent to the S-PLUS par()$cxy in R? Also, is it possible to get notice taken of some equivalent of \n in R when using text()? For what it is worth I am using RW-0.64.1. John Maindonald email : john.maindonald at anu.edu.au Statistical Consulting Unit, phone : (6249)3998 c/o CMA, SMS, fax : (6249)5549 John Dedman Mathematical