similar to: R: question about vectors + for loop

Hi, I have a problem with Kolmogorov-Smirnov test fit. I try fit distribution to my data. Actualy I create two test: - # First Kolmogorov-Smirnov Tests fit - # Second Kolmogorov-Smirnov Tests fit see below. This two test return difrent result and i don't know which is properly. Which result is properly? The first test return lower D = 0.0234 and lower p-value = 0.00304. The lower 'D'

Hi everybody, while performing ks.test for a standard exponential distribution on samples of dimension 2500, generated everytime as new, i had this strange behaviour: >data<-rexp(2500,0.4) >ks.test(data,"pexp",0.4) One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test data: data D = 0.0147, p-value = 0.6549 alternative hypothesis: two.sided >data<-rexp(2500,0.4)

Is the kolmogorov-smirnov test valid on both continuous and discrete data? I don't think so, and the example below helped me understand why. A suggestion on testing the discrete data would be appreciated. Thanks, a <- rnorm(1000, 10, 1);a # normal distribution a b <- rnorm(1000, 12, 1.5);b # normal distribution b c <- rnorm(1000, 8, 1);c # normal distribution c d <- rnorm(1000,

I got a distribution function and a empirical distribution function. How do I make to Kolmogorov-Smirnov test in R. Lets call the empirical distribution function >Fn on [0,1] and the distribution function >F on [0,1] ks.test( ) thanks for the help -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Kolmogorov-Smirnov-test-tp23296096p23296096.html Sent

Hi, Interpretation problem ! so what i did is by using the: >fit1 <- fitdist(vectNorm,"beta") Warning messages: 1: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced 2: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced 3: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced 4: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced 5: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced 6: In

Hi, why don't you try try ks.test(VeriSeti1, VeriSeti2)$p.value All the best Jenny >How can i print only the P-Value of the kolmogorov smirnov test? > > >> ks.test(VeriSeti1, VeriSeti2) > > Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test > >data: VeriSeti1 and VeriSeti2 >D = 0.5, p-value = 0.4413 >alternative hypothesis: two-sided > > >This expression

Although I saw this issue being discussed many times before, I still did not find the answer to: why does R can not calculate p-values for data with ties (i.e. - sample with two or more values the same)? Can anyone elaborate some details about how does R calculate the p- values for the Kolmogorov Smirnov test statistics? I can understand the theoretical problem that continuous distributions do

Hi r-users,   I would like to use Kolmogorov smirnov test but in my observed data(xobs) there are ties.  I got the warning message.  My question is can I do something about it?   ks.test(xobs, xsyn)           Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test data:  xobs and xsyn D = 0.0502, p-value = 0.924 alternative hypothesis: two-sided Warning message: In ks.test(xobs, xsyn) : cannot compute correct

Hi, I was wondering whether there is an implementation of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness of fit test for discrete, ordinal scale data in R - I've only managed to find the test for continuous data. Thanks! Gila

> x <- runif(100) > y <- runif(100) > ks.test(x,y) Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test data: x and y D = 0.11, p-value = 0.5806 alternative hypothesis: two-sided ok I expected that, but: > ks.test(runif(100), "runif") One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test data: runif(100) D = 0.9106, p-value < 2.2e-16 alternative hypothesis: two-sided How

Hello, While doing test of normality under R and SAS, in order to prove the efficiency of R to my company, I notice that Anderson Darling, Cramer Van Mises and Shapiro-Wilk tests results are quite the same under the two environnements, but the Kolmogorov-smirnov p-value really is different. Here is what I do: > ks.test(w,pnorm,mean(w),sd(w)) One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test data: w D

Hi, does the shapiro wilk test in R-1.3.0 work correctly? Maybe it does, but can anybody tell me why the following sample doesn't give "W = 1" and "p-value = 1": R> x<-1:9/10;x [1] 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 R> shapiro.test(qnorm(x)) Shapiro-Wilk normality test data: qnorm(x) W = 0.9925, p-value = 0.9986 I can't imagine a sample being

hello! i don't want to test my sample data for normality, but exponential- lognormal- or gammadistribution. as i've learnt the anderson-darling-test in R is only for normality and i am not supposed to use the kolmogorov-smirnov test of R for parameter estimates from sample data, is that true? can you help me, how to do this anyway! thank you very much! nadja

I'm trying to use modified Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with a Normal which I don't know it's parameters. Somebody told me about the lilifor function in R, but just can't find it. Does anybody know how I can test with the modified Kolmogorov-Smirnov test? Porqu? usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera, si pod?s usar PostgreSQL?

I am interested in a statistical comparison of multiple (5) time series' generated from modeling software (Hydrologic Simulation Program Fortran). The model output simulates daily bacteria concentration in a stream. The multiple time series' are a result of varying our representation of the stream within the model. Our main question is: Do the different methods used to represent a

Hello, I am curious if anyone has had any success with finding a R version of a k-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Most of the references that I have able to find on this are fairly old and I am wondering if this type of analysis has fallen out of favour. If so, how do people tend to compare distributions when they have more than two? Is it reasonable to pursue an adjusted p-value method. That is,

Hi, I have two sets of data, an observed data and generated data. The generated data is obtained from the model where the parameters is estimated from the observed data. So I'm not sure which to use either one-sample test ks.test(x+2, "pgamma", 3, 2) # two-sided, exact or two-sample test ks.test(x, x2, alternative="l") If I use the one-sample test I need to

Estimados todos: Me es grato escribir a esta lista de ayuda para R, ya que comparto 100% la filosofía de Software libre en especial software en Estadística ya que es la carrera que estoy siguiendo. El motivo de este mensaje es por un par de dudas que no pude resolver: 1. He utilizado las funciones para realizar pruebas de normalidad (kolmogorov-smirnov, cuando n>50) y (Shapiro, cuando

Dear list members, I am looking for a goodness of test that will tell me if a sample is likely to have come from a standard normal distribution. I can find plenty of omnibus tests for normality in the nor.test package, but none of them appear to allow me to test against the specific alternative that the data are not standard normal. My back up option is to use a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, but my

On Sun, 1 Jul 2001 mcdowella@mcdowella.demon.co.uk wrote: > Full_Name: Andrew Grant McDowell > Version: R 1.1.1 (but source in 1.3.0 looks fishy as well) > OS: Windows 2K Professional (Consumer) > Submission from: (NULL) (194.222.243.209) Please upgrade: we've found a number of Win2k bugs and worked around them since then, let alone teh bug fixes and improvements in R .... >