similar to: Render Time, Search Time

Hello people! I need to do something, but I don't know if it's possible. If you can help me, I'll be so happy! :-) I have many shares in my samba server, and I control all the access to them by user, with "valid users", and it works so fine. But my manager wants more. He wants that I hide the shares that the users don't have access. For example, look to this share:

Hi folks, I wrote a quick script to extract performance one-liners from Rails logs. (Didn''t want to futz with syslog for http://rails-analyzer.rubyforge.org/ .) Reads output from :info or :debug log levels (the defaults). Usage: # summarize < development.log # summarize < production.log Output looks like: (w/FULL_URL set false) 123.23.23.123 2006-05-05 10:59:42 | r

Matheus, The ARM backend reports these kinds of errors using FatalError method of MCContext. You can see some examples in ARMAsmBackend.cpp (search for "out of range pc-relative fixup value"). -David From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Matheus Almeida Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 5:37 AM To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu

Hi Rafael, Sure, the expansion of at least .cpload should be done in the Target ELFStreamer but AFAICS it doesn't solve my initial problem. MCCodeGenInfo is not created in tools where CodeGen isn't needed (llvm-mc) and it's still not possible to access the Relocation Model in MCObjectFileInfo from the target streamer (private member). Am I missing something obvious ? There are many

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Matheus Almeida <Matheus.Almeida at imgtec.com> wrote: >> Why Imagination Technologies do not offer the latest MIPS ABI document download link just like the ISA docs? > It's something we're considering to do and the documents should be available at some point in the [hopefully] not too distant future. > >> then why GCC disagree with

Hi Matheus, Thank you for your information! Do you known where do download MIPS ABI/EABI document? Thanks in advance! -- Best Regards, Yu Rong Tan On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Matheus Almeida <Matheus.Almeida at imgtec.com> wrote: > An assembler is the tool you're after. [And a linker if you want to have an executable in the end]. > > You can specify -filetype=obj to

hail, I have a 7-stable: [matheus@xxx /usr/home/matheus]$ uname -a FreeBSD xxx 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #2: Sun Jul 6 15:03:26 BRT 2008 root@lamneth:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx_7 i386 and there exists three geom things. gconcat status Name Status Components concat/concat0 UP ad4 ad5 gmirror status Name Status Components

> So in summary, each step is ABI compatible with the previous step. The linker will ensure that the end-user doesn't try to do the second step before the first step is finished since it will refuse to link a binary that contains both O32 and O32+fp64. It will produce an O32 binary given a combination of O32+fpxx, and similarly a O32+fp64 binary given a combination O32+fpxx and O32+fp64.

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: >> There are a lot of MIPS ABIs. > > Yes, and we've discovered that there seem to be incompatible extensions to some of these ABI's too. :) > >> I'm pretty sure Imagination Technologies working up a new abi right now. > > Not exactly. We're not working on any

Thank you very much for your information and documents! Why Imagination Technologies do not offer the latest MIPS ABI document download link just like the ISA docs? If they thought no much people interested in that doc, they had to make greate effort on compiler like GCC,LLVM by themself,then why GCC disagree with some MIPS ABI, it should be freely designed by MIPS ABI designer and compiler

For a target that hasn't implemented branch relaxation (yet), does anyone know what is the preferred way to report an error if a fixup cannot be applied because, for example, the destination of a branch is out of range? I suppose I could use asserts just like AArch64 is doing but that won't stop the assembler of emitting a branch to an undesired location in release builds. Does anyone see

On Oct 18, 2018, at 6:52 PM, Japheth Cleaver <cleaver at terabithia.org> wrote: > > Conoboy, on the other hand, takes great pains during the speech to describe a much more fluid and complex interaction between CentOS and its upstream, and puts forth CentOS as a mechanism (perhaps the best mechanism) for the winder EL community to contribute (something?) back into RHEL's future. I

Hi all, Thanks to everyone who replied to my change of case question... I doubt I would have ever randomly guessed 'toupper' or 'tolower'. I am trying to be cleaver[1] and make a flexible data structure in R. I have a relatively large quantity of data that can be broadly grouped into blocks/chunks which are identical in their form: blockid = numeric blocktype = string

Hi, I'm trying to implement a 10-bit relocation that does not start at the beginning of a byte-boundary and I'm not entirely sure I understand the use by some targets of MCFixup.Offset and MCFixupKindInfo.TargetOffset. LLVM's documentation states that: MCFixup.Offset -"/// The byte index of start of the relocation inside the encoded instruction."

I recently updated the samba to latest Debian stable version (3.0.24-2), after that I couldn't see groups on Windows stations anymore, only domain users, and any changes on smb.conf has been made. Currently I'm using Samba along with LDAP in my servers to authenticate users from Windows 9X/2000/XP workstations. I'm a bit clue less about how solve that problem, since with oldest

Who can help me? I am a very beginner on linux an so with samba! So far I can?t install samba: download latest-samba.tar.gz from samba-ftp to root directory then doing "tar -xvfz latest-samba.tar.gz" change directory to "samba-2.2.7a/source" call "./configure" and then i get following messages: loading cache ./config.cache checking for gcc... no checking for

On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 18:11, Japheth Cleaver <cleaver at terabithia.org> wrote: > > On 10/4/2019 8:17 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > > On 10/4/19 10:40 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > >> My impression is younger generation doesn't value rules that > >> programmers were following 2-3 decades ago. One of which is: > >> > >> Do not make any changes [in

Some Mips macros (e.g. la[1]) and the handling of Mips directives used for Position-Independent Programming (e.g. .cpload[2]) require access to Reloc::Model from within the Assembly Parser but there doesn't seem to be a way to do it in its current form. 1) Reloc::Model is passed to MCObjectFileInfo but it's a private member of that class 2) TargetMachine is not accessible I can also

Hi there, I was looking for cri-o 1.13 package to install on CentOS 7.6 but it seems that we only have 1.11 packaged. There is any alternative to 1.13 package to CenOS 7.6 or if I want to use it I should build from source? Thanks. -- Matheus Eduardo Bonif?cio Morais Analista de Infraestrutura de TI, Plataforma e Aplica??es Confedera??o Sicredi Centro Administrativo Sicredi ? Porto Alegre +55

If I heard/remember correctly, AT&T's UNIX was proprietary but they released it to academic institutions under NDA and were lax in enforcement. We all know what happened. In this case it's obviously open source, we know what will happen if someone tries something. My main concern is future development, will it remain open source. My real fear is that a certain un-named company is