similar to: Re: Future directions for R for Windows

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Re: Future directions for R for Windows"

1999 Apr 15
1
Future directions of R for Windows?
Now rw0640 is released, we have achieved our main goal of being able to build easily new versions from the Unix sources, and the R functionality is as complete a copy as we can achieve easily. We are now thinking of possible enhancements, and would like your comments on the following ideas. o Use a standard MDI interface like MS Office's, say. Would you prefer an MDI interface
1999 Apr 15
1
Future directions of R for Windows?
Now rw0640 is released, we have achieved our main goal of being able to build easily new versions from the Unix sources, and the R functionality is as complete a copy as we can achieve easily. We are now thinking of possible enhancements, and would like your comments on the following ideas. o Use a standard MDI interface like MS Office's, say. Would you prefer an MDI interface
1999 Apr 22
0
Summary: Future directions for R on Windows
On Thursday 15 March I wrote: > Now rw0640 is released [...] we are now thinking of possible > enhancements, and would like your comments on the following ideas. We have had 25 replies, and congratulations to all but one person for following the instructions on where to send them. They were very constructive and raised a lot of points not taken up here but which we will discuss amongst
2009 Jun 25
1
RODBC 1.2-6 on CRAN, future directions
Version 1.2.6 of RODBC is now on CRAN. This has a number of bug fixes and many workarounds for ODBC driver quirks--I've set up further testbeds for SQL Server 2008, Oracle and DB2. More visibly, the documentation has been expanded in several ways, in particular in collecting together advice on using 'schemas' and 'catalogs' in the ?RODBC overview. There is also a test
2009 Jun 25
1
RODBC 1.2-6 on CRAN, future directions
Version 1.2.6 of RODBC is now on CRAN. This has a number of bug fixes and many workarounds for ODBC driver quirks--I've set up further testbeds for SQL Server 2008, Oracle and DB2. More visibly, the documentation has been expanded in several ways, in particular in collecting together advice on using 'schemas' and 'catalogs' in the ?RODBC overview. There is also a test
2002 Jun 19
0
[R] Problems with url/download and http_proxy
This does seem to fix my problem: > Sys.getenv("http_proxy") http_proxy "http://gproxy1.pfizer.com/" > url("http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/PACKAGES",'r') description "http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/PACKAGES" class
2002 Aug 06
0
pipe and binary i/o (on Linux)
Thanks very much, Professor Ripley. Reid Huntsinger -----Original Message----- From: ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk [mailto:ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 3:00 AM To: Huntsinger, Reid Cc: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: Re: [R] pipe and binary i/o (on Linux) On Mon, 5 Aug 2002 ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk wrote: > pipe predates readBin, and no one has seen a
2000 Aug 28
0
under certain conditions, model.matrix appears to lack one (PR#648)
On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Rashid Nassar wrote: > Dear Professor Ripley, > > Thank you very much for your kind explanation. If I may lamely say > something in my defence, even as I apologize for my error: I mistook the > sentence "the (quoted) name of a function" to mean "optionally quoted" > because of the parentheses surrounding "quoted", and was
2001 Aug 21
0
Re: [R] Problem using GLM in a loop (fwd)
This example is caused by R's messing with formula environments. That's explained in ?formula, but should it not be explained in ?model.frame ? Simple test: data <- data.frame(y=rnorm(100), x=1:100) testit <- function(formula) { weights <- runif(100) glm(formula, weights=weights, data=data) } testit(y ~ x) weights is looked for in the environment of the formula, not of
2002 Jun 19
0
FW: [R] Problems with url/download and http_proxy (PR#1689)
For the record. -----Original Message----- From: ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk [mailto:ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 3:21 PM To: Warnes, Gregory R Cc: 'r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch' Subject: RE: [R] Problems with url/download and http_proxy The port is not supposed to be required, so rather than fix the docs can anyone fix the problem? On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Warnes, Gregory R
2002 Aug 14
1
FW: R CMD check: Too long [R] code line generated (PR#1900)
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > Sorry, but it was indeed the redirection of the standard output in > Cygwin/bash that cause the first problem, not R (I should stop doing > troubleshooting at 1:00 AM). So please forget about the problems reported in > R_CMD_check.out. However, it would still be nice if you still update R CMD > check to do join with "\n".
1998 Dec 07
0
R for WINDOWS (was R-0.63.1 is released)
> To: "Heberto Ghezzo" <heberto at MEAKINS.Lan.McGill.CA> > Subject: Re: [R] R-0.63.1 is released > From: Peter Dalgaard BSA <p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk> > > "Heberto Ghezzo" <heberto at MEAKINS.Lan.McGill.CA> writes: > > > Sorry for a silly question but. . . > > why the new version is 'bdr0631' ? what is the
2001 Nov 15
0
rhs of == does not work with a list of items (PR#1172)
(1) There are no lists here! You have numeric vectors, not lists. (2) The normal vector-recycling rules apply. It does 1 == 4, 2 == 5, 3 == 4, 4 == 5, 5 == 4, .... Try > 1:10 == 5:4 [1] FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE (3) For what you appear to want > x %in% 4:5 [1] FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE is the way to get it.
2000 Mar 08
0
RE: [R] RODBC
Sorry, I was commenting on the previous windows version (version file says 0.5a) (the first one which ran under RW.1.0.0) I have Win NT 4.0 Service pack 5 and R is > version _ platform Windows arch x86 os Win32 system x86, Win32 status major 1 minor 0.0 year 2000 month February day 29 language R > -----Original Message----- > From: Prof Brian
2006 Jun 24
0
Documentation detail [was: Merging factor levels.]
Hi to R developers. In the "Details:" section of "?levels", it would be nice including the following sentence, taken from a reply from Brian Ripley: If you set two levels to be the same label, they get merged. Granted, the "Examples:" section does have a terse comment and examples from which users may imply this behaviour. Yet, the documentation would be
2002 Aug 14
0
source() crashes on long lines (PR#1900)
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C2432C.7ACD6BA0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0208140920312.15226@auk.stats>
2002 Jul 26
0
Parzen Windows
I suspect Prof. Ripley's response suffices. However, there *is* a Parzen kernel for kernel smoothing: Parzen K(z) = { 4/3 - 8z^2 + 8|z|^3 if |z| <= 1/2 8(1 -|z|)^3/3 if 1/2 < |z| <= 1 0 otherwise If I'm not mistaken, this appeared in Parzen's original 1962 paper on kernel density estimation. I also seem to recall
1998 Jun 24
0
R-beta: Packages: KernSmooth logspline ppr rpart tree
The following are now on CRAN: KernSmooth: version 2.2 of the code for Wand & Jones book on kernel smoothing. logspline: spline fits to log denisites, with automatic choice of smoothing. ppr: projection pursuit regression. rpart: recursive partitioning (CART-like) VR: Venables & Ripley libraries 5.3pl021 for 0.62.1 and in the devel section tree: a clone
1998 Jun 24
0
R-beta: Packages: KernSmooth logspline ppr rpart tree
The following are now on CRAN: KernSmooth: version 2.2 of the code for Wand & Jones book on kernel smoothing. logspline: spline fits to log denisites, with automatic choice of smoothing. ppr: projection pursuit regression. rpart: recursive partitioning (CART-like) VR: Venables & Ripley libraries 5.3pl021 for 0.62.1 and in the devel section tree: a clone
2000 May 22
0
RE:bug 548 graphics '*' (PR#549)
> Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 16:52:59 +0200 (CEST) > From: Martyn Plummer <plummer@iarc.fr> > To: ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk > Subject: Re: [Rd] RE:bug 548 graphics '*' (PR#549) > Cc: R-bugs@biostat.ku.dk, r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch > > On 22-May-00 ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk wrote: > > A little more followup. The gtk() device uses gdk_string_width to > > find the