similar to: R-beta: Debian GNU/Linux 2.0 'Hamm' Released

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "R-beta: Debian GNU/Linux 2.0 'Hamm' Released"

1998 Aug 13
0
summary of replies to [strange stuff in 'last' command]
Sheldon E. Newhouse writes: > Anyone have ideas on what this output from the 'last' command means? > > TIA, > -sen > > xF*@**** otify ***@ Sat Aug 1 20:52 still logged in > xF*@**** otify ***@ Sat Aug 1 20:52 - 20:52 (00:00) > xF*@**** otify ***@ Sat Aug 1 20:52 - 20:52 (00:00) >
1998 Feb 02
1
Installation on SuSE Linux [was Re: Copyrights for R contributed libraries]
Christian Hoffmann <hoffmann@wsl.ch> writes: > I just installed the SuSE distribution of Linux (from Fuerth, Germany). I > would be very interested in learning of a SuSE compatible form of R. > Installing Linux was expressly made to be able to use R :-) > > SuSE (suse@suse.de, http://www.suse.de) is a distribution which is quickly > gaining users for Linux because of
1998 Apr 11
0
Linux libc5.4.33 dumbness w/ mk[s]temp()
Linux libc5.4.33''s mk[s]temp() functions require 6 X''s at the end of a filename (the BSD versions I''ve seen are a bit more flexible). This alone is enough to break any claims to real BSD compatability, but wait, there''s more: Only 1 of those 6 X''s are really unique. The rest are simply pid. So you can create exactly 62 temp files using mk[s]temp()
2004 Aug 06
0
IceCast 1.3.11: Segmentation Violation in Linux
*sigh* Yes, you're right... It _has_ been a few years. My drive is filling up and all, I probably have tons of old/vulnerable daemons, so it's probably time for a fresh install. I'll let you know what turns up! -P -----Original Message----- From: Jack Moffitt [mailto:jack@xiph.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 1:29 PM To: Kenyon, Paul Cc: icecast-dev@xiph.org Subject: Re:
1998 Mar 05
1
User time and system time
I am running the R-0.62.0 snapshot on a Linux system. This system has 128 Mb of real memory and almost never swaps. I am trying to use lme() on a very large example (7200 observations, 10 columns in the fixed effects, 2 columns in the random effects). We have the optimization nicely tuned so that goes relatively quickly. It seems, though, that all the data manipulation steps before the
1997 Dec 23
1
Debian package for R-0.61 uploaded
I have uploaded a Debian package r-base_0.61.0-2_i386.deb to the incoming directory at ftp.ci.tuwien.ac.at. This package is built against libc5, not libc6. Turns out that was a bit more complicated than I had hoped. I have also created an RPM file for the same binary distribution and will upload that shortly as r-base-0.61.0-2.i386.rpm. I enclose some information regarding the two packaged
1998 Sep 04
0
Linux SMB Mount utils patch
Hi, I'm sure that you are all aware that the mount utilities that ship with samba are designed to compile and run only with Linux 2.1 series development kernels. I'll _try_ keep this short and sweet while doing my best to explain what I have done, since I have a tendancy to ramble on. I have two boxes, one Linux with libc5, and another with Linux and Glibc2 (aka libc6). The Samba
2002 Jul 04
0
[Bug 336] New: ssh does not compile on Linux with libc5 and 2.0 kernel
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336 Summary: ssh does not compile on Linux with libc5 and 2.0 kernel Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at
1999 Jan 27
1
Linux 2.2.0 and Samba client not happening for me
Dudes and/or Dudettes: HEEELLLPPP! (such a newbie statement) I can't get my remote SMB mounts to work on my Linux box. duke was happily running Slackware Linux 2.0.36 and Samba 1.9.18p8 . I upgraded to Linux 2.2.0pre9 (2.2.0final), which seemed to require upgrading to Samba 2.0.0 . (I don't remember the exact errors) Now i can't get my NT and '95 disks to stay mounted on
2003 Apr 09
10
[Bug 536] no access to tty on Linux 2.0 and 2.4+libc5
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536 stuge-openssh-unix-dev at cdy.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|no access to tty on Linux |no access to tty on Linux |2.0 |2.0 and 2.4+libc5 ------- Additional Comments
2003 May 21
2
[Bug 336] ssh does not compile on Linux with libc5 and 2.0 kernel
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2003-05-21 10:36
2003 Jun 29
0
[Bug 336] ssh does not compile on Linux with libc5 and 2.0 kernel
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #308 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2003-06-29 23:16 -------
1998 Sep 30
4
R-beta: compiling R-0.62.3 on SuSe Linux
On my RedHat 5.1 machine at the office I am happily using R installed from Martyn Plummer's RPM's of R-62.3 for RH 5.1 At home I have SuSe Linux 5.3 on my PC and as RH 5.1 is libc6 based and SuSe 5.3 is still libc5 based the RH 5.1 RPM's do not install and work on SuSe (even though they have a test version of glibc). So I downloaded R-0.62.3.tgz from www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/R and tried
2003 Mar 07
1
PXElinux question - not in FAQ
Peter, we have met in Cyber space looong time ago, when I was requesting 10:minor numbers for the Netwinder project.... Now I am trying to build a network boot for Xandros distribution. I have it working, however I need to do 2 DHCP cycles - 1 happens in PXE, and then it repeats in my network boot code (based on BusyBox). All I need in the second stage is the NFS image address, passed by DHCP
2006 Jun 11
2
Old (really old) programs under CentOS.
Ok, I have a small dilemma, and I'm hoping someone here has had to do this before. I have at a site (not PARI) a server running some mission critical software that was written in 1997 for libc5, under AOLserver 2.3.? No, source code is not available for that version of AOLserver (it wasn't open-sourced until version 3.0, and the API changed rather dramatically at that point), not that it
2019 Oct 15
2
Odd issue with 7.7.1908 updated with qemu-kvm-ev
So, I have a client that has an internal use application that needs an ancient version of libc5.? That's not a typo; libc5.? Before the server that ran it died about a year and a half ago (said server was an AMD K6-2/450 with a 6GB Western Digital Caviar drive that had been spinning nearly continuously for almost 20 years!) it was running on Red Hat Linux 5.2.? The last version of CentOS
2019 Oct 15
0
Odd issue with 7.7.1908 updated with qemu-kvm-ev
Hi, > So, I have a client that has an internal use application that needs an > ancient version of libc5.? That's not a typo; libc5.? Before the server > that ran it died about a year and a half ago (said server was an AMD > K6-2/450 with a 6GB Western Digital Caviar drive that had been spinning > nearly continuously for almost 20 years!) it was running on Red Hat > Linux
2003 May 25
1
MSG: sequence number gap
Hi, I have created a chained Ogg Vorbis file containing 26 files in 75304323 bytes using the Unix 'cat' utility. When I run the file through 'ogginfo' I get the message: Warning: sequence number gap in stream 26. Got page 0 when expecting page 9. Indicates missing data. This is what I have determined: * When I run each of the component files through
2017 Apr 22
0
Need a bit of 'archeocomputing' help on CentOS 7.
On 04/21/2017 12:11 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > ... > The latest version of libc5 I know of that was shipped by Red Hat is > in RHL 6.2, libc-5.3.12. (There is a 5.4, but not sure of stability > or compatibility). > ... > I've successfully set up the bridging; a CentOS 7 VM on the same host > has full connectivity. So it's something about the rtl8139 and the >
2017 Apr 21
3
Need a bit of 'archeocomputing' help on CentOS 7.
I have an application with is binary-only, does its job well, and is only available for either libc5 (!) or early early glibc2.0 (!!). It has been running on a Red Hat Linux 5.2 (NOT RHEL; RHL) server for a really long time, and it honestly does its job and it's not easily replaced by an open-source solution at the moment. So, I need to do one of the following things: 1.) Run Red Hat