similar to: R-beta: S Mailing List

Is there any capability yet to do variance components estimation? I have looked! Jeff jmorris at cldx.com -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request

Hi All, I am experiencing issues with the use of DBase files on a Samba 2.0.5a share, that appear to be due to locking problems. Basically, I have test programs for both DOS and Win32 that does nothing but append records to a DBase database (DBF/MDX files). If more than one client PC is appending to this file, data loss occurs. I get random data loss, with records lost, and index file

Why are these APIC clock init hooks dependent on CONFIG_X86_PAE ? include/asm/paravirt.h: static inline void setup_boot_clock(void) { paravirt_ops.setup_boot_clock(); } static inline void setup_secondary_clock(void) { paravirt_ops.setup_secondary_clock(); } (via the vmi timer patch). - James -- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

Why are these APIC clock init hooks dependent on CONFIG_X86_PAE ? include/asm/paravirt.h: static inline void setup_boot_clock(void) { paravirt_ops.setup_boot_clock(); } static inline void setup_secondary_clock(void) { paravirt_ops.setup_secondary_clock(); } (via the vmi timer patch). - James -- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

Currently, 020-paravirt-xen.patch contains inconsistent declarations for a bunch of native_read/write functions. This patch updates the declarations to use unsigned long for register values. Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com> --- include/asm-i386/paravirt.h | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff -purN -X dontdiff

Currently, 020-paravirt-xen.patch contains inconsistent declarations for a bunch of native_read/write functions. This patch updates the declarations to use unsigned long for register values. Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com> --- include/asm-i386/paravirt.h | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff -purN -X dontdiff

At http://namei.org/misc/lguest/patches/time/v02/ Current status: - Resync to recent upstream lguest patch queue - Rudimentary clock event device is working, but with a significant performance hit - Old TSC code included, still needs to be modified to handle freq change Next: - Check for pending interrupts after they're enabled again per suggestion from Rusty. -- James Morris

At http://namei.org/misc/lguest/patches/time/v02/ Current status: - Resync to recent upstream lguest patch queue - Rudimentary clock event device is working, but with a significant performance hit - Old TSC code included, still needs to be modified to handle freq change Next: - Check for pending interrupts after they're enabled again per suggestion from Rusty. -- James Morris

posting the question in r-help@ to get more feedback :-) thanks, Yun-Fang ----- Original Message ----- From: "Yun-Fang Juan" <yunfang at yahoo-inc.com> To: <s-news at wubios.wustl.edu> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 2:04 PM Subject: [S] plot stacked bar chart in R > Hi, > I am trying to plot a stacked bar chart in R but am not able to find the > documentation.

Hi all. I know this has probably been asked before, but I need a quick answer, and didn't find anything on the net. Has anyone done any benchmark comparisons of server speed from Win95 clients, accessing files on a Samba 1.9.17p1 server share, as compared to an NT Server, running on the same server hardware? If so, how did Samba 1.9.17 measure up to the NT server? I need an answer to this,

1) Bridging via host is broken: we need to set "promisc" bit in MAC address published by the host so the guest sends us everything. Thanks James Morris for the report (I don't use bridging). 2) Lguest network device uses 0 to mean "noone at this slot". It used to use 0xFF, and one spot was missed. Minor: it just means we'll have a useless extra transmit

1) Bridging via host is broken: we need to set "promisc" bit in MAC address published by the host so the guest sends us everything. Thanks James Morris for the report (I don't use bridging). 2) Lguest network device uses 0 to mean "noone at this slot". It used to use 0xFF, and one spot was missed. Minor: it just means we'll have a useless extra transmit

lguest needs to hold a reference to its task in case it exits while another Guest is sending it I/O. Otherwise we can oops in access_process_vm->get_task_mm->task_lock(). Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> --- drivers/lguest/lguest_user.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) ===================================================================

The following patches are the latest update of the TSC and hrtimer patches I posted on 29/03. Rusty's original TSC patch has been resynced to the latest lguest repo, as has the hrtimer patch, which also incorporates feedback from Jeremy & Rusty: - Change clock event hrtimer to absolute time. 'now' is captured in the host during the hypercall. - Propagate -ETIME back to the

The following patches are the latest update of the TSC and hrtimer patches I posted on 29/03. Rusty's original TSC patch has been resynced to the latest lguest repo, as has the hrtimer patch, which also incorporates feedback from Jeremy & Rusty: - Change clock event hrtimer to absolute time. 'now' is captured in the host during the hypercall. - Propagate -ETIME back to the

I am having problems accessing sirio.stat.unipd.it/pub/R so can't get to his latest port (Win95, v62.3, Guido's port.) I am being denied access. This may be a local problem with our network here, but is anyone else having a problem? Is that site mirrored anywhere that I might be able to access? Thanks! Jeff jmorris at cldx.com

This came on S-news The more direct test being sapply(c(a=1,b=2), names) Problem: R ("all" versions) behaves the same as S+5.1, which is wrong IMO. {since some might disagree, I didn't yet post to R-bugs ..} ------- Start of forwarded message ------- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 23:14:57 -0230 From: "Paul Y. Peng" <ypeng@math.mun.ca> To: s-news

Hello all, I have a samba 2.2.1a server running as the PDC of my network on a Mandrake 8.0 system with a reiserFS partition. I am serving for the win98 clients a small DOS clipper program with a DBF database. The programs run well on the workstations when there is only one user using it, when another user try to use the same program it starts to get very slow. I think this is a lock

Hi all, Some of you know I've been working on a trivial in-kernel hypervisor to demonstrate paravirt_ops. The good news is that it works! (And not just for me!) The bad news is that I haven't written any documentation and now I'm going to be offline (moving to a farm) for several weeks. Nonetheless, if you're the kind of person who wants to poke around with hypervisors, no

Hi all, Some of you know I've been working on a trivial in-kernel hypervisor to demonstrate paravirt_ops. The good news is that it works! (And not just for me!) The bad news is that I haven't written any documentation and now I'm going to be offline (moving to a farm) for several weeks. Nonetheless, if you're the kind of person who wants to poke around with hypervisors, no