similar to: R-beta: qr(A)$rank

Colin Farrow <C.Farrow@geology.gla.ac.uk> writes: > Peter, > > Cautiously sticking my neck above the water line here. I have been > wondering about the Mac version for a while now. I may be able to get > an MSc IT student to work on this as a project for about 3 months > June-Sept. Before putting up the proposal some idea of the scale of the > task would be useful. Do

Hello, I am a newbie to LLVM as well as compilers and I am hoping for some direction in finding an instance of where a Reaching Definition Analysis is being implemented within LLVM. I have referenced the sources files, initially hoping to find an explicit ReachingDefinitionAnalysis.cpp file ;-) but with no such luck. Other than that I have found the files SimpleRegisterCoalescing.cpp and the

Hello, I experienced some unexpected behaviour while determining the rank of matrices (sometimes 1x1 matrices): base::qr(matrix(1e-20))$rank returns 1 (incorrect) base::qr(diag(c(1, 1e-20)))$rank returns 2 (incorrect) Best regards, Bernd > R.version _ platform x86_64-w64-mingw32 arch x86_64 os mingw32 system x86_64, mingw32 status major

This behavior is noted in the qr documentation, no? rank - the rank of x as computed by the decomposition(*): always full rank in the LAPACK case. > On Jan 22, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Serguei Sokol <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have noticed different rank values calculated by qr() depending on > LAPACK parameter. When it is FALSE (default) a true rank is

On 22.06.2017 20:09, I?aki ?car wrote: > 2017-06-22 19:49 GMT+02:00 Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>: >> On 22.06.2017 17:11, Bernd Funovits wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I experienced some unexpected behaviour while determining the rank of matrices (sometimes 1x1 matrices): >>> base::qr(matrix(1e-20))$rank returns 1

>>>>> Serguei Sokol <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> >>>>> on Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:57:47 +0100 writes: > Le 22/01/2018 ? 17:40, Keith O'Hara a ?crit?: >> This behavior is noted in the qr documentation, no? >> >> rank - the rank of x as computed by the decomposition(*): always full rank in the LAPACK case. > For a

2017-06-22 19:49 GMT+02:00 Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>: > On 22.06.2017 17:11, Bernd Funovits wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I experienced some unexpected behaviour while determining the rank of matrices (sometimes 1x1 matrices): >> base::qr(matrix(1e-20))$rank returns 1 (incorrect) >> base::qr(diag(c(1, 1e-20)))$rank returns 2

In summary.manova the qr decomposition of a NxN matrix is calculated and for some cases is giving me a rank < N. However, following suggestions of professor Ripley to calculate the rank of a Matrix On 7 Jun 2002, Brian Ripley wrote: > For a more reliable answer, look at the SVD > (function svd) and look at the > singular values. For example (from lda.default) X.s <-

Thanks for the response. I was more specifically looking through the source code for a place where Reaching Definitions was implemented to derive those uses and/or to generate the SSA. To provide some context, as a student I have a project to implement a path infeasibility algorithm to "Sharpen" the results of the Reaching Definitions results in LLVM. Being new to LLVM I wasn't

2017-06-22 20:31 GMT+02:00 Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>: > > > On 22.06.2017 20:09, I?aki ?car wrote: >> >> 2017-06-22 19:49 GMT+02:00 Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>: >>> >>> On 22.06.2017 17:11, Bernd Funovits wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I

The immediate uses info provides reaching definitions already, at least while the code is in SSA form. So uh, what more are you looking for? 2009/3/17 Shone Sadler <shone.sadler at gmail.com>: > Hello, > > > I am a newbie to LLVM as well as compilers and I am hoping for some > direction in finding an instance of where a Reaching Definition Analysis is > being implemented

Hi, PostgreSQL has a tool pg_config that returns the parameters the ./configure script was called with. $ pg_config --libdir /usr/local/lib $ pg_config --includedir /usr/local/include Does Samba have a similar feature and how do I call it? Sorry, but this is impossible to google for. Bertram -- Bertram Scharpf Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany http://www.bertram-scharpf.de

Hi, I have noticed different rank values calculated by qr() depending on LAPACK parameter. When it is FALSE (default) a true rank is estimated and returned. Unfortunately, when LAPACK is set to TRUE, the min(nrow(A), ncol(A)) is returned which is only occasionally a true rank. Would not it be more consistent to replace the rank in the latter case by something based on the following pseudo code ?

Just adding a bit more info: Running wbinfo -t on the file server results in a successful trust secret check via RPC Running wbinfo -u on the file server returns all my AD users Running wbinfo -g on the file server returns all my AD groups Running wbinfo -p on the file server results in a successful ping to winbindd I have used the basic smb.conf on the wiki page for the file/member

Le 23/01/2018 ? 08:47, Martin Maechler a ?crit?: >>>>>> Serguei Sokol <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> >>>>>> on Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:57:47 +0100 writes: > > Le 22/01/2018 ? 17:40, Keith O'Hara a ?crit?: > >> This behavior is noted in the qr documentation, no? > >> > >> rank - the rank of x as

Hi, for a job of lesser priority I would like to connect to a Samba server. When I'm doing a 'smbmount', enter the server by SSH, pgrep for the new smbd process and then renice it I have exactly the behaviour I desire. Now I would like to automate this and yet start the server process with lower priority. Connections to other clients shall not be touched at all. Are there any

Hey everyone Have a (relatively) old CentOS SAMBA4 Active Directory running version 4.2.2, time to upgrade to the latest in the 4.2 series. As it's running as a VM on ESXI I have it backed up by VEEAM and I can take a snapshot before making any changes. Any major items to be aware of before upgrading to 4.2.13? Any reason I should not perhaps be looking a bit further to the 4.4.x

Hi, the first thing I did with Asterisk is listening to `demo-congrats' by Xlite on the same machine. This works perfectly. The config files are those shipped with the package. Now I want to listen to it over ISDN/Capi but I don't succeed. My `capi.conf' is like show in many tutorial on the web. In `extensions.conf' I just added the following lines: [capi-in] exten =>

Dear Everybody! I want to export data to LaTeX. As I want to employ the data as freely as possible I want to avoid the xtable-command and instead generate some List like \MyOwnPrettyCommand{Adam}{Auer}{17} \MyOwnPrettyCommand{Bertram}{Bauer}{14} \MyOwnPrettyCommand{Christoph}{Huber}{75} \MyOwnPrettyCommand{Damian}{Dorfer}{69} \MyOwnPrettyCommand{Emanuel}{Eder}{43} with \MyOwnPrittyCommand

[Something seems to have went wrong with my previous posting. It appears on the archive page in another thread. I did not receive anything myself. So I may give it another try:] Hi, the first thing I did with Asterisk is listening to `demo-congrats' by Xlite on the same machine. This works perfectly. The config files are those shipped with the package. Now I want to listen to it over