similar to: R-beta: t.test

I'd like to learn the process of revising R functions & packages and then submitting proposed patches to the R Core team. Would someone be willing to mentor me through one example? For starters, consider an example. I'd like to revise the t.test function to return the stderr value to the user. We only need to change the "rval" in the third-from-the end line of

Hello, I wuold like to propose my modifications of the original cor.test to you : I tried to calcolate the correct p-value for Spearman and Kendall's test with ties. Let me know what you think. Thanks you for your time. Antonietta di Salvatore test <- function(x, ...) UseMethod("test") test.default <- function(x, y, alternative = c("two.sided",

I wish the t.test function in stats would return the standard error. It would be nicer for students if R simply reported the standard error used to calculate the t value. I trolled for this in r-help and got no answers, which I interpreted to mean that this is boring but possibly not wrong. Hopefully. I believe only simple changes are needed. In the source code src/library/stats/t.test.R file:

Hello, I'm looking to calculate a 95% confidence interval about my estimate for a sample's weighted mean, where the calculated confidence interval would equal the t-test confidence interval of the sample in the case when all of the weights are equal. My initial thought was to simply implement a modified version of the t-test function but substituting the weighted variance and mean for the

Full_Name: Dirk Koschuetzki Version: 2.1.1 OS: source code Submission from: (NULL) (194.94.136.34) Hello, >From the source code (R-2.1.1, file: .../R-2.1.1/src/library/stats/R/) ****************************** cor.test.default <- function(x, y, alternative = c("two.sided", "less", "greater"), method = c("pearson", "kendall",

RE t.test in R I objected a day or two ago to the behaviour of the one-sample t.test in R where it is easy to generate a "confidence interval" for the mean of the population which does not contain the sample mean, in the case where the null hypothesis is rejected. It now appears that the same behaviour is latent in the code for the two-sample version of this test. The relevant lines

Dear useRs, I was searching CRAN for implementation of kurtosis and skewness tests, and found that there is some kind of lack on it. So, I have written three functions: 1. Anscombe-Glynn test for kurtosis 2. Bonett-Seier test based on Geary's kurtosis (which is not widely known, but I was inspired by original paper describing it, found coincidentally in Elsevier database) 3.

Dear R Users, Is the p-value reported in a two-tailed binomial exact test in error or is it a feature? If it is a feature, could someone provide a reference for its two-tailed p-value computations? Using Blaker's (2000 - Canad. J. Statist 28: 783-798) approach,the p-value is the minimum of the two-tailed probabilities $P \left(Y\geq y_{obs}\right)$ and $P\left(Y\leq y_{obs}\right)$

Hi, R newb here. I've coded a function that inputs N dimensional array(s) [or class=numeric if it's dim=1] of coefficients and tstats, where dim(coef_matrix)=dim(tstat_matrix), it will then output a same dimension matrix of coefficients pasted to tstats in brackets pasted to significance stars. If I go straight to the code INSIDE the function, it works 100% as it's supposed to. The

Hello! I am running a very simple mini Monte-Carlo below using the function tstatistic (right below this sentence): tstatistic = function(x,y){ m=length(x) n=length(y) sp=sqrt( ((m-1)*sd(x)^2 + (n-1)*sd(y)^2)/(m+n-2) ) t=(mean(x)-mean(y))/(sp*sqrt(1/m+1/n)) return(t) } alpha=.1; m=10; n=10 # sets alpha, m, n - for run 1 N=10000 # sets the number of simulations n.reject=0 # counter of num.

Hi, people. I was a bit intrigued by the message quoted below. Indeed, if pt() is given a matrix, it returns a matrix. Should this feature be documented? ?pt speaks about "a vector of quantiles", and says nothing about the type of what it returns. The same might presumably apply to other distribution-related functions. ----- Forwarded message from Martyn Plummer <plummer at

Here's one possibility, assuming muhat and sigmahat are estimtes of mu and sigma from N iid draws of N(mu, sigma^2): tStat <- abs(x - muhat) / sigmahat pValue <- pt(tStat, df=N, lower=TRUE) I'm not quite sure what df tStat should have (exercise for math stat), but given fairly large N, that should make little difference. Andy > From: Ross Clement > > Hi. I have a

Dear R list members, I'd like to make a graph of coefficients of the intercept, variable 1, and variable 2 (and possibly the interaction between variable 1 and variable 2). When I use the lmList function as attached below, it shows a nice coefficient graph. > PACRP.lis <- lmList(PAffect ~ CRPC + CRPT + CINT | ID, redinteract) > coef(PACRP.lis) > PACRPlis.coef <-

I am trying to assign values to a vector (pvalue). Similar code works in C but not in R. What am I doing wrong? r <- pvalue <- 0 for(i in (1:(k-1))){ for(j in (i+1):k){ r <- r+1 tstat <- (means[i]-means[j])/rms pvalue[r] <- 2*(1-pt(abs(tstat),df)) } } Thank you. Peter B. -- Peter B. Mandeville mandevip at deimos.tc.uaslp.mx Jefe del

I am asking this question to see if it is possible or desirable to build a compilation/runtime system for C/C++ that can support the following: 1. allow bc to call native (in dynamically loaded *.so) 2. allow native to call bc (through JIT or interpreter) 3. can compile/interpret C/C++ sources _BASED_ on type info in precompiled bc Motivation: The class files produced by the java compiler

I am trying to run the following model in R > lmer(leaves.eaten~Geocytotype+(1|TEST/ PLANT),data=cyphoplantfeeding,family=poisson) My experimental setup is 41 replicates (TEST) of an experiment in which there are three Geocytotypes of a plant species in each TEST, and two plant pseudoreplicates per Geocytotype in each test (i.e. 3*2=6 plants per test). So my random factors are trying

Thank you so much Dr. Nash, I truly appreciate your kind and valuable contribution. Cheers, Paul El El s?b, 19 de ago. de 2023 a la(s) 3:35 p. m., J C Nash < profjcnash at gmail.com> escribi?: > Why bother. nlsr can find a solution from very crude start. > > Mixture <- c(17, 14, 5, 1, 11, 2, 16, 7, 19, 23, 20, 6, 13, 21, 3, 18, 15, > 26, 8, 22) > x1 <- c(69.98, 72.5,

libswfdec/swfdec_as_array.c | 7 +- libswfdec/swfdec_as_context.c | 36 +++++++----- libswfdec/swfdec_as_math.c | 43 ++++++++------- libswfdec/swfdec_as_native_function.c | 15 +++++ libswfdec/swfdec_as_number.c | 27 +++++++-- libswfdec/swfdec_as_object.c | 21 +++++-- libswfdec/swfdec_as_string.c | 95

This is a fairly long problem, but one I run into often. This may be a problem in statistics, not R, in which case I shouldn't expect an answer. The punch line is at the end (III). The rest is motivational background. Forgive any idiocy. ------- In an experiment, suppose, each of 100 subjects reads 20 cases and rates their familiarity and emotion (how emotion-arousing they are). I want

Hi. I'd like to do a t-test to compare the Delta values of items with Crit=1 with Delta values of items with Crit=0. What is the t.test syntax? It should produce a result like this below (I can't get in touch with the person who originally did this for me) Welch Two Sample t-test data: t1$Delta by Crit t = -3.4105, df = 8.674, p-value = 0.008173 alternative hypothesis: true