similar to: R-beta: Compiling on HPUX 9.05 and DEC alpha OSF1

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "R-beta: Compiling on HPUX 9.05 and DEC alpha OSF1"

1999 Aug 19
1
bug: R says "Floating exception" on DEC-Alpha w/OSF1 (PR#252)
Dear R Development Core Team, I've been trying to install R ver. 0.64.0 on a Dec-Alpha machine w/OSF1. A couple of things go wrong. After I type "make", the installation process bombs while trying to compile the R.binary. It reports the following: f77 -o ../../bin/R.binary {*** for brevity, I've deleted the filenames printed here ***} ld:
1998 May 07
2
R-beta: 0.61.3: Problems on DEC Unix 4.0
Hi, I had some trouble compiling the new R version on my Alpha: make[2]: Entering directory `/usr2/local/R/src/graphics' cc -ieee_with_inexact -O -Olimit 2000 -I/usr/local/include -I../include -c gdevice.c cc -ieee_with_inexact -O -Olimit 2000 -I/usr/local/include -I../include -c graphics.c cc: Error: graphics.c, line 808: An unexpected newline character is present in a string literal.
1998 May 07
2
R-beta: 0.61.3: Problems on DEC Unix 4.0
Hi, I had some trouble compiling the new R version on my Alpha: make[2]: Entering directory `/usr2/local/R/src/graphics' cc -ieee_with_inexact -O -Olimit 2000 -I/usr/local/include -I../include -c gdevice.c cc -ieee_with_inexact -O -Olimit 2000 -I/usr/local/include -I../include -c graphics.c cc: Error: graphics.c, line 808: An unexpected newline character is present in a string literal.
2000 Mar 20
0
Testparm Error HPUX - DLD.SL Library
HP_UX 10.20 / SAMBA2.0.6 / gcc Compiles just fine. Run the "testparm /opt/samba/lib/smb.conf" command and get the following error . . . "/usr/lib/dld.sl: Unresolved symbol: vsnprintf (code) from testparm Abort (coredump)" What are the pre-requisite(s) for libraries for Samba to function or is this a known error / fix. Please, could someone respond with a push in the right
1998 Jan 06
1
R-beta: Dec alpha
R ran find on our Sun until it was stolen. I have now set up R on one of our Dec Alphas OSF1 V4.0 386. R-0.49 configures builds and runs fine except that the glm command crashes R. R-0.60.1 configures builds and runs until a cis entered. I think the problem is the floating point conventions but before I get in over my head a question Has anyone used glm successfully on Alphas OSF1 V4.0 386?
2004 Oct 01
1
bzip2 directory won't build on OSF1 due to C99 code and -std1 option (PR#7257)
Full_Name: Michael Hoffman Version: 2.0.0-beta-20041001 OS: OSF1 V5.1 Submission from: (NULL) (193.62.199.8) Hello. Building R 2.0.0-beta-20041001 on OSF1 V5.1 failed because the default configure sets R_XTRA_CFLAGS to "-std1 -ieee_with_inexact." The bzip2 directory includes C99 code that requires -std1 to not be set in order to compile. This halts the overall build process.
2002 Jun 28
0
[Bug 319] New: Privilege Separation failing on OSF1 v5.1
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319 Summary: Privilege Separation failing on OSF1 v5.1 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: Alpha OS/Version: OSF/1 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy:
1998 May 07
0
Re R-beta: 0.61.3: Problems on DEC Unix 4.0
> I had some trouble compiling the new R version on my Alpha: > > make[2]: Entering directory `/usr2/local/R/src/graphics' > cc -ieee_with_inexact -O -Olimit 2000 -I/usr/local/include -I../include -c > gdevice.c > cc -ieee_with_inexact -O -Olimit 2000 -I/usr/local/include -I../include -c > graphics.c > cc: Error: graphics.c, line 808: An unexpected newline
2006 Apr 28
0
R installation on ALPHA/OSF1
I am stuck in the installation of "R" on ALPHA runing OSF1/V5.1 for individual use. When I ran "./configure CC=cc F77=f77 Make=gmake ", the following message came out, 506426:/usr/users/1/mwang2/R/R-2.1.1/bin/exec/R: /sbin/loader: Error: libreadline.so.4: symbol "tgetflag" unresolved 506426:/usr/users/1/mwang2/R/R-2.1.1/bin/exec/R: /sbin/loader: Fatal Error: Load
2000 Apr 17
0
Problem: Samba 2.0.7pre4 --with-utmp on OSF1
I tried configuring Samba 2.0.7pre4 on a OSF1 machine (actually a DEC Alpha running Digital Unix 4.0d) with --with-utmp. The autoconf system sets the variable HAVE_UTMPX_H The linking of smbd aborts with the message ---------------------------------------------------------- ld: Unresolved: getutmpx utmpxname updwtmpx *** Exit 1 ---------------------------------------------------------- If I
2001 Jul 19
1
Compiling R-1.3.0-patched on OSF1
Dear R-users, I currently have trouble in trying to compile R-1.3.0-patched on Compaq OSF1. -------- >uname -a OSF1 adenine.fysik.dtu.dk V4.0 1229 alpha -------- The 'configure' step ended seemingly corretly: ----------------------- R is now configured for alphaev6-dec-osf4.0f Source directory: . Installation directory: /home/adenine/sysman/laurent/share/ C
2003 Sep 22
1
Compiling shared library on Alpha/OSF1
I'm having trouble compiling and installing R as a shared library on Alpha/OSF1. I used ./configure --enable-R-shlib SHLIB_CXXLDFLAGS=-L/lib/cmplrs/cxx (Using configure with --enable-R-shlib alone generated "Could not determine SHLIB_CXXLDFLAGS" errors.) make and everything else were done as specified in the documentation. It compiled everything without visible problems, but on
1998 Nov 13
0
Pb with SAMBA on OSF1
Hi, I have a problem with Samba on an OSF1 v4.0d machine. I get an "INTERNAL ERROR" and a core dump when trying to connect to a share from an NT 4.0 SP3 or W95 machine. I configured Samba to use encrypted password and I set the parameter "security=user". My Samba server is in a workgroup on its own, no PDC and BDCs around. I can see it in my Computer Neighborhood from the NT
1998 Dec 08
0
Can't connect to shares w/2.0beta3 on OSF1 <MORE INFO>
>Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 11:00:42 -0500 (EST) >From: Rob Naccarato <rob@sheridanc.on.ca> >To: samba@samba.org >Subject: Can't connect to shares w/2.0beta3 on OSF1 > > >I was running 1.9.18p10 on a test DEC Unix 4.0d box here and I decided to >give 2.0beta3 a try. For some reason, I cannot connect to any of the >server's >shares or even get a list of
2001 Sep 13
0
?: 'rsync' hang with 'sshd2' (F-Secure), Digital Unix (OSF1) and HP/UX 11
Hi, I have managed to test this same transfer reliably with the Linux boxes and open-ssh, but I am in trouble with the OSF1 4.0 (Digital Unix) being the server sending files from a single directory to the HP/UX 11 - being the client The 'sshd2' (and ssh2) in both ends is installed as root (and starts probably from 'rc') The 'rsync' (2.4.6) in both end is just
2001 May 07
1
OSF1 and USE_SIA
Is the following (from configure.in) intended: *-dec-osf*) if test ! -z "USE_SIA" ; then AC_MSG_CHECKING(for Digital Unix Security Integration Architecture) should that be "$USE_SIA" or similar or what is the point of testing a constant string for being zero length... The reason I ask is the for complex reasons we don't want SIA enabled on Tru64 since it breaks some
2002 Jun 28
4
[Bug 319] Privilege Separation failing on OSF1 v5.1
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319 ------- Additional Comments From mouring at eviladmin.org 2002-06-29 02:59 ------- Created an attachment (id=120) Sounds like an SIA issue w/ privsep. Does this fix it? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
2002 Jul 17
0
Problem with OSF1 and Openssh > 3.1p1 and XForwarding
OS: Tru64 5.1 OpenSSH version: 3.2.2p1 and higher. Problem: after upgrading sshd my servers no longer forward X11 connections. I ran the server as 'sshd -d' and saw that the server was successfully creating and binding the IPV6 socket but failing to bind the IPV4 socket. The error message is: Bind to port 22 on 0.0.0.0 failed: Address already in use. Also, when channels.c tries to open
2000 Mar 16
2
R-1.0.0 on alpha/osf1 memory glitch (PR#490)
Digital Alpha (various), Digital UNIX V4.0[EF], R-1.0.0, gcc, f77 When using batch mode with the save option, an error message is issued. However [I have just discovered that] it appears that the operation does complete, i.e. the .RData file is saved successfully. The main problem is that the return code is non-zero (and so it is impossible to distinguish this "non-error" from some
1999 Jan 24
1
HPUX 9.05 & Samba 2.0.0 & problems -> solved !
Hi there ! I just solved the problem that produced following error in smb.log file: 'check_access_allowed_for_current_user: The process is no longer waiting!' Since nobody gave me any help I had to dig this out myself :-) This error happens if two programs hold more than 10 same files simultaneously open through Samba and check_access_allowed_for_current_user() gets called. And this