similar to: computer stalls instead of reboot

Hi, The Gentoo-Wiki about Xen suggests, to add "-mno-tls-direct-seg-refs" to CFLAGS and to recompile the whole system. So it seems, NPTL will work without problems (and without performance drawback) after that. Sweet! But i carefully read http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenSpecificGlibc, and it says: "On 32-bit x86 platforms, Xen uses segmentation to provide protection of the

Hi, until now, i have been using Xen 3.0.2. Now i upgraded to Xen 3.0.4. Can anybody confirm, that the ordner in the config files for the network interfaces has not changed? My config file used to read: vif = [ ''bridge=xenbr0'', ''bridge=xenbr1'' ] So inside the DomU, eth0 was attached to xenbr0 on the host and eth1 was attached to xenbr1. Now i upgraded to

Hi, below is the output of the kernel just before it goes down and crashes. I have to use "xm destroy" to kill it. I have tried the enable/disable the "Optimize for Size" setting in the kernel. I hopes that it''s some kind of compiler bug because of the "invalid opcode" thing. But actually I don''t a clue what this might be caused by. Do you

Hi, i''ve new hardware for my XEN server. It boots pv_ops kernel now. But with my pv_ops kernel the server doesn''t power off. Even there isn''t this messages for it. When i boot a 2.6.24 from Ubuntu it power off. Regards, Stefan Kuhne _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

Hey! I''m deploying a vanilla Xen 4.1.2 installation at a hosting provider, and I''m experiencing hard hangs (i.e., the system is unresponsive to keystrokes, network is off, I/O to disk is stopped) on several of their available server packages, all based on Intel i7 CPUs and related chipsets. The failure does not seem related to a specific Xen-version (I''ve

Hey all! I''m currently in the process of trying to debug a (possibly!) Xen-related issue (with Kernel 3.2.9-vanilla as Dom0, and Xen 4.1.2 [almost] vanilla, except for a patch for CVE-2012-0029), where a system freezes without me being able to ascertain a triggering event. The system console is completely unresponsive in the event of hangs (i.e., displays motd and the login prompt,

Hi, I recently tried to use the newly released mod_rails (www.modrails.com) for Apache, and discovered it doesn't work on FreeBSD 7. It does however work on FreeBSD 6 just fine. I tracked it down to sendmsg() as detailed here: http://code.google.com/p/phusion-passenger/issues/detail?id=16 The mod_rails/passenger unit tests fail on FD passing, as do the Ruby 1.8.6 standard unit

I try pci pci passthrough with xen 3.3.1 and CentOS 5.2(64bit) on a SUPERMICRO C7X58 board I see the following the error in my boot log. (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:372: RMRR is incorrect. This problem is caused by this condition in dmr.c:372. if ( rmrr->base_address >= rmrr->end_address ) { dprintk(XENLOG_ERR VTDPREFIX, "RMRR is incorrect.\n"); return -EFAULT; } As an

I try pci pci passthrough with xen 3.3.1 and CentOS 5.2(64bit) on a SUPERMICRO C7X58 board I see the following the error in my boot log. (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:372: RMRR is incorrect. This problem is caused by this condition in dmr.c:372. if ( rmrr->base_address >= rmrr->end_address ) { dprintk(XENLOG_ERR VTDPREFIX, "RMRR is incorrect.\n"); return -EFAULT; } As an

Hello Rowland, Am 23.08.2019 13:12, schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > Do not bother, I take it you missed that red-hat (who produces sssd) > no longer supports using sssd with Winbind. So your cure is obvious: > apt-get purge sssd as I'm not using sssd and winbind for the same authentication domain (rather, winbind is for a windows domain, sssd for an LDAP-based authentication

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hey, I stumbled across strange behaviour with LDAP searches against a Samba 4 AD today, where queries for (&(objectClass=x)(|(...)(...)))" won't deliver any result, whereas queries (|(...)(...)) will function correctly. To illustrate: - --- modelnine at xdom00 ~ $ ldapsearch -H ldap://id.modelnine.org -b

On 06/13/2013 10:11 PM, Michael Giardino wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running libvert on a Debian 7 system. I have upgraded libvert and qemu > from source (v1.06 and 1.5.0 respectively) and the problem persists. The > guest OS is also a Debian 7 system running a non-SMP kernel. The error > message from virt-manager is > > Error starting domain: unsupported configuration:

> -------- Original message -------- > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] Can I configure cores instead of CPU's > From: Todd And Margo Chester <toddandmargo at gmail.com> > To: "libvirt-users at redhat.com" <libvirt-users at redhat.com> > CC: > > > Hi All, > > Scientific Linux 6.1 x64 > qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.160.el6_1.2.x86_64 > > My XP-Pro

Hey, Am 23.08.2019 11:13, schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > Your where running Debian buster 4.9.5, you could try my 4.9.11/4.10.6 > package of debian sid/testing, its 4.9.11 package. same behaviour with testing (4.9.11), tested that already. As I already wrote, I've definitely checked the networking, and that's all fine. There are no network packets generated by winbind when

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Heiko Wundram via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 22 augustus 2019 16:13 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Winbind timeouts/hangs(?) > > Am 22.08.2019 15:31, schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > > Sorry, but you cannot rely on the output of

> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > >> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: >> >> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel >> >> shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about >> >> Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake >> >> has the current EL6

Hi, I have a server at Hetzner and something strange happend. First, I installed FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 (amd64) via their FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE rescue system, that's ok. I had to configure the network by using the em driver -> em0 interface. But suddenly, the network was lost. After an ACPI reboot, nothing. Going to the vKVM show me the system didn't detected em0 anymore but an nVidia

1: x86/mwait_idle: remove assumption of one C-state per MWAIT flag 2: x86/mwait_idle: export both C1 and C1E 3: x86/mwait_idle: initial C8, C9, C10 support Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

Hello, http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_1110_xenkvm&num=1 Ubuntu 11.10 with Xen 4.1.1 and Linux 3.0. Xen seems to be doing very poorly on that benchmark. If someone has time to repeat that benchmark it would be good.. Comparing the results to those from Stefano from XenSummit 2011 NA there has be something wrong.. the results at XenSummit were pretty much the

Hey! As I''ve already written about two days ago, I''m having major trouble getting blktap2 to work properly. After trying xen-sources-2.6.32-xen-r1 from Gentoo (where Andrew Lyon, the maintainer, has already confirmed that he''s hitting the same problem as me, i.e. the blktap2 driver is dysfunctional in the kernel), I decided to give a pv_ops-Kernel a try, and checked out