similar to: unable to access volume integrated for RDMA through NFS mount

Dear gluster team, I have installed glusterfs on my servers for the storage. Machine: x86_64-redhat-linux I have created volumes with rdma protocol for infiniband. I have mount with acl option on server and client. When I run setfacl for glusterfs mount point it works fine but when i do it for nfs mount it says. setfacl <dir> : operation not supported. The logs created in server are as

Hi, I am trying to install glusterfs 3.3.1 from source code. At the time of configuration i am getting the following error * configure: error: python does not have ctypes support* On my system python version is: 2.4.3 Kindly advice on fixing the error. Thanks n Regards Neetu Sharma Bangalore -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Dear gluster team, I have installed glusterfs on my servers for the storage. Machine: x86_64-redhat-linux I have created volumes with rdma protocol for infiniband. I have mount with acl option on server and client. When I run setfacl for glusterfs mount point it works fine but when i do it for nfs mount it says. setfacl <dir> : operation not supported. The logs created in server are as

> complex(real = 0, imaginary = Inf) [1] 0+Infi > Inf*1i [1] NaN+Infi >> complex(real = 0, imaginary = Inf)/5 [1] NaN+Infi See the Note in ?complex for the explanation, I think. Duncan can correct if I'm wrong. -- Bert On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 3:20?PM Leo Mada <leo.mada at syonic.eu> wrote: > Dear Bert, > > These behave like real divisions/multiplications: >

On 2024-09-05 6:12 p.m., Leo Mada wrote: > Dear Duncan, > > Here is also the missing information: > R version 4.4.1 (2024-06-14 ucrt) > Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 > Running under: Windows 10 x64 (build 19045) > > Regarding the results: > atan(1i) > #?0+Infi > Re(atan(1i)) > # 0 > Im(atan(1i)) > #? Inf > > 0 + Inf i is a valid complex number:

Dear Bert, These behave like real divisions/multiplications: complex(re=Inf, im = Inf) * 5 # Inf+Infi complex(re=-Inf, im = Inf) * 5 # -Inf+Infi The real division / multiplication should be faster and also is well behaved. I was expecting R to do the real division/multiplication on a complex number. Which R actually does for these very particular cases; but not when only Im(x) is Inf.

atan(1i) -> 0 + Inf i complex(1/5) -> 0.2 + 0i atan(1i) -> (0 + Inf i) * (0.2 + 0i) -> 0*0.2 + 0*0i + Inf i * 0.2 + Inf i * 0i infinity times zero is undefined -> 0 + 0i + Inf i + NaN * i^2 -> 0 + 0i + Inf i - NaN -> NaN + Inf i I am not sure how complex arithmetic could arrive at another answer. I advise against messing with infinities... use atan2() if you don't

The thing is that real*complex, complex*real, and complex/real are not "complex arithmetic" in the requisite sense. The complex numbers are a vector space over the reals, and complex*real and real*complex are vector*scalar and scalar*vector. For example, in the Ada programming language, we have function "*" (Left, Right : Complex) return Complex; function "*" (Left :

I expect that atan(1i) = (0 + infinity i) and that atan(1i)/5 = (0 + infinity i)/5 = (0 + infinity i). Here's what I get in C: (0,1) = (0, 1) atan((0,1)) = (0, inf) atan((0,1))/5 = (0, inf) Note the difference between I*infinity = (0,1)*infinity = (0*infinity,1*infinity) = (NaN,infinity) and (0,infinity)/5 = (0/5,infinity/5) = (0,infinity). The former involves multiplying 0 by infinity, which

Perhaps > Inf*1i [1] NaN+Infi clarifies why it is *not* a bug. (Boy, did that jog some long dusty math memories :-) ) -- Bert On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 2:48?PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 2024-09-05 4:23 p.m., Leo Mada via R-help wrote: > > Dear R Users, > > > > Is this desired behaviour? > > I presume it's a bug. > >

On 2024-09-06 12:44 a.m., Richard O'Keefe wrote: > I expect that atan(1i) = (0 + infinity i) and that atan(1i)/5 = (0 + > infinity i)/5 = (0 + infinity i). > Here's what I get in C: > (0,1) = (0, 1) > atan((0,1)) = (0, inf) > atan((0,1))/5 = (0, inf) > > Note the difference between I*infinity = (0,1)*infinity = > (0*infinity,1*infinity) = (NaN,infinity) > and

On 2024-09-05 4:23 p.m., Leo Mada via R-help wrote: > Dear R Users, > > Is this desired behaviour? > I presume it's a bug. > > atan(1i) > # 0+Infi > > tan(atan(1i)) > # 0+1i > > atan(1i) / 5 > # NaN+Infi There's no need to involve atan() and tan() in this: > (0+Inf*1i)/5 [1] NaN+Infi Why do you think this is a bug? Duncan Murdoch

Anyone ele having these issues mounting RDMA only volumes under Ubuntu? Install of Gluster via: https://launchpad.net/~semiosis/+archive/ubuntu-glusterfs-3.4 I'm guessing this build is looking for an include somewhere that is just misplaced? glusterfs 3.4.0beta4 built on Jun 28 2013 16:16:07 Repository revision: git://git.gluster.com/glusterfs.git Copyright (c) 2006-2011 Gluster Inc.

Dear R Users, Is this desired behaviour? I presume it's a bug. atan(1i) # 0+Infi tan(atan(1i)) # 0+1i atan(1i) / 5 # NaN+Infi There were some changes in handling of complex numbers. But it looks like a bug. Sincerely, Leonard [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, we would like to build a gluster storage systems that combines our need for performance with our need for disaster recovery. I saw a couple of posts indicating that this is possible (http://gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2010-February/003862.html) but am not 100% clear if that is possible Let's assume I have a total of 6 storage servers and bricks and want to spread them across 2

Hello I have two peers setup and working with x2 bricks each. They have been working via tcp for the last 4-5 months. I just got two Infiniband cards and put the on the peers. I want to change the transport type to rdma instead of tcp but I don't see an easy way to do this. Can you please help me with proper instructions. Best Regards Ivan Dimitrov

G.5.1 para 2 can be found in the C17 standard -- I actually have the final draft not the published standard. It's in earlier standards, I just didn't check earlier standards. Complex arithmetic was not in the first C standard (C89) but was in C99. The complex numbers do indeed form a field, and Z*W invokes an operation in that field when Z and W are both complex numbers. Z*R and R*Z,

Dear Experts, I need to calculate the cdf of the standard normal distribution, i.e. H(x) = 1/sqrt(2*pi) integral(exp(-z^2/2) dz), where z is b/w -infi to infi. I know there should be a way to do it in R, but did not know to do it. I'd appreciate any help you could offer. Charlie Liu Graduate student intern at EPA/ECO

>>>>> Richard O'Keefe >>>>> on Fri, 6 Sep 2024 17:24:07 +1200 writes: > The thing is that real*complex, complex*real, and complex/real are not > "complex arithmetic" in the requisite sense. > The complex numbers are a vector space over the reals, Yes, but they _also_ are field (and as others have argued mathematically only

On 4/11/19 4:01 AM, Yuval Shaia wrote: > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/virtio/Kconfig > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ > +config INFINIBAND_VIRTIO_RDMA > + tristate "VirtIO Paravirtualized RDMA Driver" > + depends on NETDEVICES && ETHERNET && PCI && INET > + ---help--- > + This driver provides low-level support for VirtIO Paravirtual > + RDMA adapter.