Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "IBM GPFS filesystem"
2008 Jun 05
1
samba GPFS and HSM?
Hi -
I was wondering if any of you may be able to point me in the right direction.
I am in the process of designing a fairly large fileserver solution in an MS Active directory environment.
I have setup and tested ctdb samba, however, after several discussions with a couple of my colleagues, i am now considering a more vanilla flavour of samba. The key features the solution requires are:
•
2011 Feb 17
2
BUG: SAMBA 3.5.x and IBM TSM
Hi!
I am using SAMBA 3.5.x and it doesn't work with IBM TSM.
IBM TSM works properly with SAMBA 3.2.15.
Is there any chance to solve this issue in future SAMBA versions?
Best regards
/Adrian Berlin
--
You Rock! Your E-Mail Should Too! Signup Now at Rock.com and get 2GB of Storage!
http://connections.rock.com/user/displayUserRegisterPage.kickAction?as=116748&STATUS=MAIN
2013 May 01
2
IBM gpfs file system and mount resource
Hi all,
I wonder if anyone know whether or not it is possible to issue a custom
mount command via the mount resource?
My issue is that we are running a gpfs file system which uses the commands
mmmount and mmumount for file system mounting and re-mounting. The standard
mount resource does not work.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
Rick
--
You received this message because you
2013 Jan 31
2
ACLs on a directory on GPFS
Hello,
I am using the vfs_gpfs samba module to map ACLs through samba. It works
fine on files, but directory ACLs are ignored. Ex:
getfacl /sb/share/myplace/
file: sb/share/myplace/
owner: root
group: root
user::rwx
user:afrankel:rwx
group::---
mask::rwx
other::---
When I try to access this folder in Windows, I get permission denied.
The same permissions on a files, I can open it / modify it
2010 Aug 13
26
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7618] New: symlinks and --link-dest
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7618
Summary: symlinks and --link-dest
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.7
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: the_majkl at seznam.cz
QAContact:
2012 Jan 04
1
GPFS for mail-storage (Was: Re: Compressing existing maildirs)
Great information, thank you. Could you remark on GPFS services hosting mail storage over a WAN between two geographically separated data centers?
----- Reply message -----
From: "Jan-Frode Myklebust" <janfrode at tanso.net>
To: "Stan Hoeppner" <stan at hardwarefreak.com>
Cc: "Timo Sirainen" <tss at iki.fi>, <dovecot at dovecot.org>
Subject:
2005 Jan 14
1
Samba & Tivoli Storage Mgr (TSM) Integration Query ???
All,
Can anyone confirm that Samba/Solaris will integrate with TSM (Tivoli
Storage Manager) when deployed into a Wintel client environment.
ie. Solaris/Samba as a TSM client
- we need to be sure that the ACL's will be maintained correctly via a
TSM backup/restore (full or partial)
Or confirm this does not work, which is not what we want to hear - but
the truth will suffice.
Many thanks,
2013 Oct 21
1
Bug vfs module gpfs:winattrs ?
Hello,
does this bug still exists: http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/IPyW4fzzpEetiWKnJyfJ ?
It seems that I have the same problem, although "store dos attributes" is set (Samba 3.6.18; GPFS 3.5.0-11).
Here my share definition:
[shared]
comment = <comment>
path = <path>
available = yes
2012 May 11
2
cannot set gpfs:sharemodes to yes
Hi,
I'm trying to set up samba share exporting gpfs filesystem and I strugle
with setting sharemode to yes. Samba is 3.6.5, gpfs version is 3.2.1-29
(the latest available for 3.2 branch). Everything works fine when sharemode
is set to no, but I'd rather insist to switch it to yes. That's what man
page says:
no - do not propagate sharemodes across all GPFS nodes. This should only
be
2008 Jan 11
1
Samba 3.0.28 with VFS-Module "GPFS"
Hi Rob,
on your Info for Version 3.0.25 you pointed out the VFS-Module GPFS for
using features of the underlaying GPFS-Filesystem.
Also the man-pages-3/vfs_gpfs.8.html points to that module, but I can't
find it anywhere.
We are using a GPFS 3.2 3-Node Samba Cluster (3.0.24/28) on Dell HW.
We would be very glad if it is posible to get
- Quota Recognition for our users (we use "max
2008 Oct 20
1
Patch for GPFS support
List,
We, IBM, have developed a patch that enhances RSYNC.
This patch provides extensions to RSYNC to map to and use filesystem
extensions present in the IBM GPFS cluster filesystem.
(GPFS is a cluster filesystem for Linux and AIX that provides additional
attributes such as NFSv4 ACLs, extended attributes and windows attributes
in addition to the common posix permissions)
This will greatly
2012 Sep 28
1
Patch for GPFS support
Hi all
My apologies for dragging up a very old mail from the depths of the
rsync archives:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2008-October/021963.html
I'm trying to use Ronnie's patch to get rsync to copy my GPFS NFSv4
ACLs. I'm having trouble building Ronnie's gpfs.c though - it turns out
my programming isn't up to a challenge greater than "configure; make"!
2009 Jul 15
1
can not read file permissions via samba over gpfs
Hi,
I am using samba samba3-3.3.4-39, with ctdb ctdb-1.0-69.x86_64, gpfs
gpfs-3.2.1 on centos 5.3 x86_64.
My problem is that from samba share I can't read file permissions and file
ownership, although I'm in "domain admins" group, which has full
permissions(rwx) via inherited acl (not user or group ownership).
If I'm in a group that owns the file, I can read the permissions,
2011 Apr 18
0
BUG: SAMBA 3.5.x and IBM TSM
Hi,
I'm curious if you have any updates regarding this problem. I'm facing
exactly the same issue.
When I'm trying to make a backup with IBM TSM of a Samba share mounted
under Windows, I keep receiving the error message that "required NT
privilege is not held".
This problem started to appear when I migrated to Samba 3.5.x. With
previous Samba versions, IBM TSM was able to
2016 Jul 06
1
"No previous versions" - GPFS 3.5 and shadow_copy2
Hi all,
At some point recently my customers can no longer see GPFS snapshots under the Windows Previous Versions tab. It simply says "No previous versions available". If a fileset is exported with the flag "force user = root" then Previous Versions *are* displayed.
[2016/07/06 10:07:35.602080, 3] ../source3/smbd/vfs.c:1322(check_reduced_name)
check_reduced_name:
2015 May 21
2
STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION when Read while Write on GPFS + CTDB
Hi,
in the following scenario I've got the Problem of "STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION".
Client A (with User 1) copies a file to share X. (with: DENY_NONE 0x120196 WRONLY NONE)
Client B (with User 1) reads this file from share X (with: DENY_NONE 0x120089 RDONLY NONE)
Now Client C (with User 1) wants also to read this file from share X and gets the STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION.
2013 Oct 17
1
Can't restore from GPFS snapshots, disk_free error
Hello,
We're trying to set up a GPFS system with Samba running on top with CTDB
managing it.
I have snapshots set up to be accessible in every directory as the invisible
directory .snap
The snapshots are in the following format:
/usr/lpp/mmfs/bin/mmcrsnapshot 1MB `TZ=GMT date + at GMT-%Y.%m.%d-%H.%M.%S`
?and look like this from the UNIX level:
2007 Mar 15
1
Samba 3.0.x, GPFS and NFSv4, ACLs and so on... ???
hi list,
we have plans to implement GPFS in our heterogeneous environment (win,
linux and mac clients; many linux servers) to scale better in file
serving and improve availability.
are there any recommendations regarding samba and GPFS and samba
co-existing with NFSv4 (ACLs!) on GPFS on the same machine?
or is this too experimental and we should either use samba or nfs in the
cluster?
i?ve read
2010 Jun 07
1
GPFS, samba, robocopy and timestamps
Hi list,
I'm trying to use robocopy to move some files over to a samba share
backed by GPFS. I keep getting "ERROR 50 (0x00000032) Time-stamping
destination file ... The network request is not supported."
What is strange is that the files are still coped over, even though
robocopy believes the copy failed, and in the smb log I don't have any
errors or erroneous NT_STATS
2013 Feb 18
1
ACL problem with Samba > 3.4.x on GPFS
When a file is created with samba 3.5.x or 3.6.x, it is created effective read-only:
~ # getfacl Microsoft\ Word-Dokument\ \(neu\).docx
# file: Microsoft\040Word-Dokument\040(neu).docx
# owner: root
# group: 11816
user::rwx
user:11582:rwx #effective:r--
group::rwx #effective:r--
mask::r--
other::---
The ACL-settings for the parent directory are ok:
~ # getfacl .
#