similar to: vrit ip config

Hi all, Someone played with kickstart bonding with centos 6.4 ? CentOS 6.4, as upstream now support ifcae bonding in kickstart network section. I've an issue with configuring a second bonding iface in kicstart on CentOS 6.4. The first bonding (bond0) works as espected but the second is not configured during installation. I've a 6 nic server (two for "puclic" network, two for

Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com> --- src/test/functional/host_controller_test.rb | 41 -------------------- .../functional/managed_node_configuration_test.rb | 14 ++++--- src/test/functional/nic_controller_test.rb | 8 ---- src/test/functional/permission_controller_test.rb | 15 ++++--- src/test/functional/quota_controller_test.rb | 2 +-

Hi all, We are hitting an error in the centos 7 installation with our kickstart configuration. =============================================================================== An unknown error has occurred =============================================================================== anaconda 21.48.22.56-1 exception report Traceback (most recent call first): File

Hello All, I seem to have run into a bug with the new --bridgeslaves=<INTERFACE> option. It would seem that if I tell the bridge device to use a virtual interface (like bond0) rather than a physical interface (em1/em2) that kickstart completely barfs on it. I have provided my network section below which works fine as long as i don't enable all the bridge content. When the

> Date: Monday, October 03, 2016 22:00:07 -0400 > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> > >> From: Gordon Messmer >> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM >> >> On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: >> > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every >> > was possible to be able to access the guest from the LAN

I had a major HD failure and need to rebuild my host server and the virtual servers that resided on it. I am moving from CentOS 5.6 to CentOS 6.3. I am using the same configuration, as best as I can tell, that was working only hours ago on 5.6 but does not work on 6.3. My guest server can see network traffic on the bridged network device but I cannot seem to interact with it. Iptables turned

Hi all. I have currently an OpenVZ server: uname -a Linux vader8.superhost.pl 2.6.32-042stab055.16 #1 SMP Fri Jun 8 19:22:28 MSD 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 6.2 (Final) lspci | grep -i eth 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 03) cd /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts

took a couple months off due to road blocks, hoping a fresh look would allow me to use my server as desired. I have three ports, eth0-2 over two nics. I want to bond them, and then use a bridge to connect to virtual machines on the virtual host computer. Never having done this, I am confused on some parts. Here is where I am at now and any pointers helpful. Single server, centos 6.x My issue

Hello! I would like to use the new bonding feature of kickstart in release 6.4. My setup is one bonding interface (bond0) with two (eth0, eth1) ethernet cards. I am using two VLANs on bonding interface so I have no IP for bond0 but have IPs for bond0.1 and bond0.2. If I create config by hand it works. Now I would like to convert my kickstart file using the new bonding feature. The kickstart

If you'd like to extend that a little bit, here's example configs on how to do LACP and vlan tagging on c6: host network-scripts # cat ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 ONBOOT=yes USEERCTL=no BOOTPROTO=none IPV6INIT=no MTU=1500 MASTER=bond0 SLAVE=yes host network-scripts # cat ifcfg-eth1 DEVICE=eth1 ONBOOT=yes USEERCTL=no BOOTPROTO=none IPV6INIT=no MTU=1500 MASTER=bond0 SLAVE=yes host

Hi, I'm kickstarting a vm in ESXi 5.1. ks.cfg is on floppy, install media is ISO file. This works great as long as I don't add an additional repo, in our case it is vmware tools on one of our webservers. If I add the repo line, anaconda asks then for the used network card and indeed, switching to console the interfaces are still unconfigured. Chosing eth0 in gui continues the

Hello, I?m trying to configure a CentOS 7 server to act as a host for a bunch of virtual servers (KVM). I have an 802.3ad bonded Ethernet connected to the server with a bunch of tagged VLANs. I want to be able to build a bridge interface on the server for each VLAN and then attach that to the bond interface and the virtual clients. I also want to attach a host interface to one of the VLANs

hello all, I have been trying to set-up bridged network with VLAN and not able to succeed as many tutorials address only single NIC. I am trying to setup 2 guests (backtrack instance) each guest has NIC1 and NIC2. following is snippet for guest1 I am not able to get 192.168.0.2 address back on guest eth0. VIRT-MANAGER GUI : guest1-lan details radio button left side panel NIC1

----- Original Message ----- | Hi, | | I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as | follows: | | nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own | address as source address | nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own | address as source address | | And the operating systems is extremely slow | |

On 20/09/2019 04:55, Carlos A. Carnero Delgado wrote: > Hi! > > I just upgraded a machine to 7.7.1908 and the default route is not being > set on boot. This particular server has a bonded interface, and the > corresponding configuration for the master is ( > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-bond0): > > TYPE=Bond > BOOTPROTO=none > DEFROUTE=yes >

I''ve been using Puppet now for a month or so and I''ve come to a problem that may warrant an additional Puppet metaparameter. I''m advocating the addition of a metaparameter called "preaction" (or something like that), which will perform some arbitrary action before the resource is modified. There may be a way to do this within Puppet already (with some

2015-11-12 18:07 GMT-03:00 James A. Peltier <jpeltier at sfu.ca>: > ----- Original Message ----- > | Hi, > | > | I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as > | follows: > | > | nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own > | address as source address > | nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received

>To: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS ><centos-virt at centos.org> Message-ID: ><448255702.63.1260531144350.JavaMail.root at mail.chi.ldsys.net> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >----- "rewing" <rewing at howfortune.com> wrote: >> I need to allocate public IP address to two guest os. >> > >I have only 2 network card

Ok, so some of this now works, but I'm still having problems. With the bootif option, the system now correctly configures and uses the same interface to get its kickstart file. However, when the system is done and boots up, the interfaces are still messed up. So this is what I have in the kickstart file: # On-Board Port 1 with public IP configuration network --noipv6 --onboot yes --bootproto

Setting up bonding in active-backup mode 1 (using ARP monitoring) on a server, it looked OK, but pulling the active link cable didn't actually work, it didn't fail over. Eventually with manual playing around with modprobe, ifconfig, ifenslave, etc., a solution was stumbled upon: enslave the eth1 device before eth0, and all is good. Why this should matter is a puzzle - I could not find